| Author |
Message |
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 18 Mar 2008 10:54:18 IST
|
|
|
i know that in accelerated frames pseudo forces are introduce simply to compensate for abrupt motions which are a consequence of inertia
and i understand that i could always solve the problem from an inertial frame
but what is your point .
pseudo forces are still supposed to lead us to right answers then why this paradox?
sorry if you felt i was aggresive.
|
science-
the most fundamental
the most eternal
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
18 Mar 2008 16:03:50 IST
|
|
|
hey..i have a doubt in this problem...see...when we draw the fbd of the 3 kg block..i cant explain like this....look at the link...ive drawn the fbd there......http://mypage.skrbl.com/vyppidoubt2.html
and originally the ques is at...http://mypage.skrbl.com/vyppidoubt.html
ppl plz read the whole thing and answer plz....
|
Do not follow where the path may lead. Go instead where there is no path and leave a trail. |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
18 Mar 2008 16:40:02 IST
|
|
|
ya you are right , i think that was a typing mistake by ganesh because the answer in this frame comes out to be 44N
|
science-
the most fundamental
the most eternal
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
|
|
Moderation Team
![[Up]](/templates/default/images/icon_up.gif "[Up]"){kind=icon}
