| Author |
Message |
|
|
|
|
Friction is required to roll a disc in a particular direction cos to rotate a disc , we require torque wich can be provided by tangential force......
as force of friction is the only tangential force in this case...so its required
force of friction after perfect rolling begins will be zero
|
I always like to walk in rain as no one can see me crying there :(
frnds are like diamonds , if u hit them , they don't break but they slip frm ur hands
-----It is better to be hated for what you are than to be loved for what you are not.----
*****wen love and skill work together--expect a masterpiece*****
|
this reply: 26 points
(with 4 
in 7 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 18 Dec 2007 14:29:50 IST
|
|
|
i've got a simliar one ................ Q. Would days become longer or shorter in near future.???
Ans - Due to global warming, ice at the pole, will melt into water, and thus the moment of inertia (I) also increases.. But by conservation of angular momentum, I1W1=I2W2 therefore W, the angular velcity decreases, and days will become longer............. Hope u find it helpful.................
|
SAARE JAHAAN SE ACHCHA;
GOIIT HAMARA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
this reply: 67 points
(with 13 
in 14 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 18 Dec 2007 14:35:08 IST
|
|
|
here is a question on rotational mechanics there is a cylinder on a smooth inclined plane, at an angle 'w' wrt horizontal. mass of cylinder = m, radius of cylinder = r. it is initially at a height h on the incline, calculate its translational velocity at the end of the incline. you would be thinkin, the potential energy of the cylinder [ mg (r+h) ] would be converted into rotational and translational kinetic energy at the end of the incline. NO. it will be converted only into translational k.e. for rotational motion, there must be a torque. there is no question of torque when the inclined plane is smooth so the answer is, v = (2gh + 2gr)^ (1/2)
|
Ratings do not necessarily signify that someone is good, or bad. I'm here to learn and help others learn, and a person unlocking the mysteries with the help of my solution, to a nagging problem, means more pleasure to me than ratings can ever make me feel. |
this reply: 20 points
(with 4 
in 4 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 18 Dec 2007 14:35:43 IST
|
|
|
For a rolling body of same mass and radius (vaise this is a common 1)
Vsphere > Vdisc > Vshell > Vring
and acceleration also follows the same trend (naturally yaar)
but the time taken will be in order
tsphere < tdisc < tshell < tring
--> If a particle is moving on a circular path with an angular speed omega about the centre of the circle ,
its angular speed about a point on the opposite side of diameter passing thru it is (omega/2)
|
I always like to walk in rain as no one can see me crying there :(
frnds are like diamonds , if u hit them , they don't break but they slip frm ur hands
-----It is better to be hated for what you are than to be loved for what you are not.----
*****wen love and skill work together--expect a masterpiece*****
|
this reply: 17 points
(with 3 
in 4 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 18 Dec 2007 14:43:40 IST
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | / v0 | | / | |/)@ | ----------- d sorry for the bad diagram Q. a ball is projected at an angle @ to the horizontal, between two walls 'd' distant from each other, with a velocity v0. the height of the walls is to be assumed to extend to infinity. assuming that the ball collides elastically with the walls, find the total time it takes for the ball to come down. A. the time that the ball takes to come down does not depend on horizontal component of velocity, only on the vertical component of it. upon collision, the walls only may change the horizontal component of velocity. so actually this is nothing but a simple projectile motion sum;
|
Ratings do not necessarily signify that someone is good, or bad. I'm here to learn and help others learn, and a person unlocking the mysteries with the help of my solution, to a nagging problem, means more pleasure to me than ratings can ever make me feel. |
this reply: 20 points
(with 4 
in 4 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 18 Dec 2007 14:45:05 IST
|
|
|
Take one more dude................ Q.Even a sphere rolling on a FRICTIONLESS ground slows down, why??????????? Ans - Because there is a slight deformation in the contact surface (and hence it is no more a point). this shifts the centre of mass and hence the normal force. The torque due to this normal force opposes the rolling and sphere stops . Hope it helps
|
SAARE JAHAAN SE ACHCHA;
GOIIT HAMARA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
this reply: 62 points
(with 12 
in 13 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 18 Dec 2007 15:03:16 IST
|
|
|
hcv question: why does a fat man fall over while bending? A. for a fat man, the center of mass is above his waist. so if he bends, it is horizontally displaced as compared to his feet. the normal reaction does not shift its line of action. the man's weight, due to changed position of center of mass, acts along another line. generally, the normal reaction and weight act along same line so he doesn't fall over. however if they act along different lines, this sets up a torque that makes him fall frontwards
|
Ratings do not necessarily signify that someone is good, or bad. I'm here to learn and help others learn, and a person unlocking the mysteries with the help of my solution, to a nagging problem, means more pleasure to me than ratings can ever make me feel. |
this reply: 27 points
(with 5 
in 6 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 18 Dec 2007 15:05:02 IST
|
|
|
SOME IMPORTANT RELATIONS....
1st the value of vel at bottom
for -:
a circular ring or cyl.shell , vel at bottom = (gs sin@)1/2
a circular disc or solid cyl , vel at bottom = (1.33 gs sin@)1/2
solid sphere , vel at bottom = [ (10/7) gs sin@ ] 1/2
spherical shell , vel at bottom = [ (6/5) gs cos@ ]1/2
2nd acc at bottom
for
circular ring or cyl shell , its = (1/2) gsin@
circular disc or solid cyl , its = (2/3) gsin@
solid sphere , its = (5/7) gsin@
spherical shell , its (3.5) gsin@
3rd time taken to reach at bottom....
for
circular ring or cyl shell , its { (4s) / gsin@ }1/2
circular disc or solid cyl , its { (3s) / gsin@ }1/2
solid sphere , its { (14s) / 5gsin@ }1/2
spherical shell , its { (10s) / 3gsin@ }1/2
hope this helps.....
|
I always like to walk in rain as no one can see me crying there :(
frnds are like diamonds , if u hit them , they don't break but they slip frm ur hands
-----It is better to be hated for what you are than to be loved for what you are not.----
*****wen love and skill work together--expect a masterpiece*****
|
this reply: 37 points
(with 7 
in 8 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 18 Dec 2007 15:33:52 IST
|
|
|
Here are some more important things to "Remember" : 1)When a body is projected vertically upwards with Velocity having the magnitude equal to the magnitude of Acceleration due to Gravity then time taken to reach max Height is 1sec and max height reached is g/2. 2)The Ratio of Distances travelled in 1st,2nd,3rd second of freely falling body is 1 : 3 : 5. 3)The ratio of maxim. height reached by different bodies projected upwards with Velocities U1,U2,U3 is equal to U12 : U22 : U32 . 4)For a body projected upwards,the distance covered by the body in the last second of its Upward journey remains 4.9m irrespective of Velocity of Projection. Hope you find it useful. Cheers!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
Always available for help !
But Remember Don't hesitate to ask a good Question but
Be damn serious for Questioning a weak one.
<TABLE CELLSPACING="1" CELLPADDING="1" BORDER="0">
<TR><TD>
<DIV ALIGN="right">Glitter Graphics</DIV></TD></TR></TABLE>
|
this reply: 19 points
(with 3 
in 5 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 18 Dec 2007 17:11:43 IST
|
|
|
Tension in the string
Guess whats the tension in the string????
|
"I a universe of atoms.......an atom in the universe" |
this reply: 10 points
(with 2 
in 2 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 18 Dec 2007 17:12:26 IST
|
|
|
Ans: 49 N
|
"I a universe of atoms.......an atom in the universe" |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 18 Dec 2007 17:46:34 IST
|
|
|
@siddarth Due to global warming, ice at the pole, will melt into water and will flow into sea . thus mass from the axis of rotation will get away from it,therefore moment of inertia sud increase I=MR2 BECAUSE MASS IS CONSTANT BUT R WILL INCREASE???
and hance the day and night sud be longer????
PLS crct if i am wrong,...........
|
|
this reply: 10 points
(with 2 
in 2 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 18 Dec 2007 17:50:09 IST
|
|
|