| Author |
Message |
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 21 Mar 2008 00:52:29 IST
|
|
|
that is sumthing even i dont understand lol.......
believe it or not he is the 6th top member of goiit this month!!!!
|
"I a universe of atoms.......an atom in the universe" |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
21 Mar 2008 00:52:43 IST
|
|
|
Dei arpan, dont ya get it! i dont want a soln as i already know one! So nice try -----
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
21 Mar 2008 00:53:59 IST
|
|
|
n som people cm 2 goiit jus 2 hav fun.
hope u know whom im takin abt
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
21 Mar 2008 00:54:37 IST
|
|
|
Me or astatine? :D :D
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
21 Mar 2008 00:56:45 IST
|
|
|
smt amit, an dutta etc.haven seen deir single ans so far.
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
21 Mar 2008 00:57:45 IST
|
|
|
example-- elasti
let me ask 1 ques..
all of u hav filled 3 pages of this thread without any meaningful result...
and u dont even bother if somebody i ready to post the solution..
then introspect urselves to find out who is more casual and who is more serious...
and people who hav been gossiping uselessly here, better try and post a solution (if u know) or just shut up..
|
all the best ... |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
21 Mar 2008 00:57:50 IST
|
|
|
dey rohit
im talkin abt smart amit , anath dutta. etc.
n ofc the gal u know!
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
21 Mar 2008 00:58:01 IST
|
|
|
example-- elasti
let me ask 1 ques..
all of u hav filled 3 pages of this thread without any meaningful result...
and u dont even bother if somebody is ready to post the solution..
then introspect urselves to find out who is more casual and who is more serious...
and people who hav been gossiping uselessly here, better try and post a solution (if u know) or just shut up..
|
all the best ... |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
21 Mar 2008 00:59:41 IST
|
|
|
Look who's talking da :D :D well i knw the soln so i can talk, if u want or others want u can post the soln but i cant assure rates like giving alms to a beggar that's all. Hope its nice n straight now :D
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
21 Mar 2008 00:59:56 IST
|
|
|
arpan don make me swear, bt i hav posted som answers 2day.
atleast better dan u. not beggin 4 rates like aq*$@@@$
see my posts if u hav ne doubt. n i don give a damn abt this rates.
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
21 Mar 2008 01:05:03 IST
|
|
|
(fool) seems apt for u guys..
sandeep,
dont flaunt ur knowledge
this one is fairly simple ...
elasti
if u think u r so brainy, try solving this
|
all the best ... |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
21 Mar 2008 01:09:33 IST
|
|
|
sandeep
dont show off before these babies..
if u wanna prove something, try deligne conjecture on 1-motives.. or maybe denjoy conjecture
if u want more ask me
|
all the best ... |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
21 Mar 2008 01:13:31 IST
|
|
|
ya ya ill try n meanwhile u try proving the Navier Stokes eqn ok :D Atleast ull earn millions of dollars :D :D :P if tht's too easy fer you, try the other millenium problems :D :D
|
this reply: 2 points
(with 0
in 1 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
21 Mar 2008 06:14:53 IST
|
|
|
I dont believe this, I went through 30 posts and found that there was only one answer and the rest was just junk conversation. Arent u guys freaking out a bit here.
|
Time wounds all heels |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
21 Mar 2008 07:27:23 IST
|
|
|
and pottermania was right....why didn't sandeep ramesh recognize it ....
since m ends with 5 so m=5k where k is odd
so
(3^m + 2^m)*(3^m + 4^m)= (3^5k + 2^5k )*(3^5k + 4^5k ) where k is odd but we know for u odd a+b|a^{u}+b^{u} set a=3^{5},b=2^{5} and 4^{5} consecutively to get
275*1267=175*1991|(3^m + 2^m)*(3^m + 4^m) |
Moderation Team
![[Up]](/templates/default/images/icon_up.gif "[Up]"){kind=icon}
1
