| Author |
Message |
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 23 Nov 2007 22:27:49 IST
|
|
|
and karthik i don think the acceleration is constant because the thrust force varies with velocity since mgsin@ is going to accelerate the object the velocity is going to vary and hence the total acceleration
|
science-
the most fundamental
the most eternal
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 23 Nov 2007 22:28:52 IST
|
|
|
@ waterdemon.......
does the sum require integration.... i think i m getting it
|
salman khan |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 23 Nov 2007 22:30:05 IST
|
|
|
Yes..............there is integration in one step for sure. go ahead if you solve it i'll solve it tomorrow.
|
Always available for help !
But Remember Don't hesitate to ask a good Question but
Be damn serious for Questioning a weak one.
<TABLE CELLSPACING="1" CELLPADDING="1" BORDER="0">
<TR><TD>
<DIV ALIGN="right">Glitter Graphics</DIV></TD></TR></TABLE>
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 23 Nov 2007 22:31:43 IST
|
|
|
can i take the velocity constant for a short interval ....... or else waterdemon would not have told to take dt and all...
|
salman khan |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 23 Nov 2007 22:42:55 IST
|
|
|
Instead of that why don't you try Change in momentum for a short interval.It will be easier. Nudge me if not solvable bcoz many of nudged me to post the solution .......i am waiting for you. But that does not mean that you lose your hope............. I won't think anything negative about you even if you think for 7 days for this sum and then say "I did not get it" Still I am encouraging you all to ive your best shot at this "BEST OF LUCK EVERYONE" Cheers!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
Always available for help !
But Remember Don't hesitate to ask a good Question but
Be damn serious for Questioning a weak one.
<TABLE CELLSPACING="1" CELLPADDING="1" BORDER="0">
<TR><TD>
<DIV ALIGN="right">Glitter Graphics</DIV></TD></TR></TABLE>
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
having got the permission to integrate...... i ended up in this way the answer comes......... but i have to consider the velocity to be constant for some small interval of time dt. i realised my previous mistake.... i took accl^n along the plane something other than gsin30 let v be the velocity over time interval t to t+dt. we have to consider that the time t is that time by which the sledge goes 120m. let M = mass of the sand box (sledge) So (M + 40 - 2t)v - [M + 40 - 2(t + dt) ]v = change in momentum = Force x (time interval) or 2vdt = Fdt or 2v = F F = force on the sledge at time t = mass at time t x gsin30 = (40 - 2t) x 5 So 5(40 - 2t) = 2v or v = (5/2)(40 - 2t) or dx/dt = (5/2)(40 - 2t) or dx = (5/2)(40 - 2t)dt integrating.. x = 5/2{ 40t - t2} 120 = 5/2. (40t - t2) Now solving gives t = 1.23s and 38.8s it took me two and a half hours ......... but still an imperfect answer with an impurity of 1.23s appears with 38.8s
|
salman khan |
this reply: 35 points
(with 7 
in 7 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 23 Nov 2007 22:55:25 IST
|
|
|
thanx waterdemon ....... for the help of advising me on taking that change in momentum........
i tried conserving momentum at first..... but it did not work...
but why 1.23 s appears ???
|
salman khan |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 23 Nov 2007 23:04:00 IST
|
|
|
please friend....... temme why 1.23s appears...why should we reject it...???
today nite.... i'll sleep very well man for my ears turned red doing this sum.... i m feeling very relaxed now.... but make me fell more by telling why 1.23 s WHY WHY WHY....
|
salman khan |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 23 Nov 2007 23:11:19 IST
|
|
|
@biki
Kyun tension le raha hai bhai. So many times we get junk values. Just reject them and goto sleep . lol
|
http://14-69-8.blogspot.com
My blog |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 23 Nov 2007 23:14:05 IST
|
|
|
Amazing answer by Biki !!!!!!!!!!! Congrats !!!!!!!!!! Now let me show you how I got it. Solution: Let initially the mass of the sledge be 'm' and mass of sand falling per second be say " ". If V be the velocity of the sledge after "T" seconds,then in a small interval "dT" the Change in Momentum is given by (m - T)V - [m- (T+dT)]V = F.dT....(1) Here F is the force and F = (m- T)gSin@ ....(2) Substituting the value of "F" from Equation (2) in Eq.(1) & Solving we wil get the following Expression: V = (m- T)gSin@ .ds/dT = (m- T)gSin@ Now we integrate the following expression and we get: .S = (mT - T2/2)gSin@ Substituting the values provded as: S = 120m. = 2 kg/sec m = 40kg. @ = 300. 2 x 120 = (40T - 2 x T2/2) x 10Sin(30) 240 = (40T - T2)5 48 = 40T - T2 T2 - 40T + 48 = 0 Now solve for T T = 40 + 1408 2 T = 38.8sec. Hope you all find it useful. Rate if useful. Biki you got your 5 salutes.Gr8 effort. Cheers!!!!!!!!!@@@!!!!!!!!!!
|
Always available for help !
But Remember Don't hesitate to ask a good Question but
Be damn serious for Questioning a weak one.
<TABLE CELLSPACING="1" CELLPADDING="1" BORDER="0">
<TR><TD>
<DIV ALIGN="right">Glitter Graphics</DIV></TD></TR></TABLE>
|
this reply: 10 points
(with 2 
in 2 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 23 Nov 2007 23:15:08 IST
|
|
|
grt question n grt solution by biki yaar i think its acceleration is always less than gsin30 so time taken should come >6.99 as it comes by taking a=gsin30 so 1.23 s can never be a soln its only a biproduct of the quadratic
|
<TABLE CELLSPACING="1" CELLPADDING="1" BORDER="0">
<TR><TD>
<DIV ALIGN="right">Animated Letters</DIV></TD></TR></TABLE>
I am only one,
But still I am one.
I cannot do everything,
But still I can do something;
And because I cannot do everything
I will not refuse to do the something that I can do.
- Edward Everett Hale
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 23 Nov 2007 23:16:17 IST
|
|
|
The reason is clear dude acceleration of (gSin@) is not enough for the sledge to cover 120m in 1.23 sec. Hope you got it. Rate if useful. Cheers!!!!!@@@!!!!!!
|
Always available for help !
But Remember Don't hesitate to ask a good Question but
Be damn serious for Questioning a weak one.
<TABLE CELLSPACING="1" CELLPADDING="1" BORDER="0">
<TR><TD>
<DIV ALIGN="right">Glitter Graphics</DIV></TD></TR></TABLE>
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 23 Nov 2007 23:17:26 IST
|
|
|
it is at a vertical height 120 sin 30 = 60 m assuming free fall g = 10 m /s/s time is greater than 1.23 s so this is rejected.
|
it is not important where u stand, but in which direction u are moving |
|
|