| Author |
Message |
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 24 Jan 2008 12:02:17 IST
|
|
|
|
VARSHA KRISHNAN....
------------------------------------
IIT is always a word which rises E thru' d body. But 2 achieve it U hav 2 drain out d entire E out of the body....
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 24 Jan 2008 12:04:14 IST
|
|
|
well the ans 2 C6H5- CH2-O-C6H5 +HI --------> C6H5CH2-I +C6H5-OH is because I- being a gud nucleophile doent get attached 2 benzene ring(u all knoe prep of iodo benzene is possible only by addition of KI 2 its diazonium salt ) hence all phenolic rings attached 2 an ether -O- directly form only phenol and not iodobenzene ( simply remem as a rule)
|
VARSHA KRISHNAN....
------------------------------------
IIT is always a word which rises E thru' d body. But 2 achieve it U hav 2 drain out d entire E out of the body....
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 24 Jan 2008 12:52:35 IST
|
|
|
In the first reaction iodide ion attacks less hindered carbon atom and thus we get CH3I and (CH3)3C-OH
but in this reaction C6H5CH2OC6H5 + HI --------> C6H5CH2I + PHENOL
WE GET C6H5CH2I because the benzylic carbocation C6H5CH2+ is stabilised by resonance ........... so iodide ion attacks benzylic carbon atom and thus we get C6H5CH2I
another example of this kind is.................
1. C6H5OCH3 + HI -----------> CH3I + C6H5OH
to explain this reaction ...... first in C6H5OCH3 the oxygen gets protonated to give
C6H5-O+-CH3 | H
in this intermediate the phenyl oxygen bond is stronger than methyl oxygen bond (due to resonance ) so iodide ion attacks the methyl group to give CH3I and phenol
thus we have to see either carbocation stability or steric hindrance to predict the product............
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 24 Jan 2008 16:32:15 IST
|
|
|
in a rxn we shud only concentrate on the RDS n not on the steps that r very fast like the nucleophilic or electrophilic attack...in this rxn the RDS is formation of carbocation.....so more is the stability of carbocation more will b the amt of product obtained....the 1st rxn is absolutely correct...m sure abt this and ne doubts r ever welcome...... yours truly
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 24 Jan 2008 18:21:08 IST
|
|
|
1) in the first one, tertiary carbocation is formed which is more stabler than primary. so v get tertiary iodide and not primary. 2)in the second one,it is due to partial double bond character of C-O bond that v get C6H5CH2-I and not C6H5-I. !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
Varsha
be cool,
tomorrow is what we make it today,
so if u can dream it , u can make it .
life is an ice cream ,eat it before it melts away!!!!!!!!!
    

|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
|
|