(posted on 20 Oct 2007 10:46:14 IST)
|
| |
theory is depicted in a very natural way,easy to understand;rotational was superb!!!! |
|
(posted on 22 Oct 2007 22:45:06 IST)
|
| |
earlier used to hail hcv. bt now it is ok. overall a good book. |
|
(posted on 23 Oct 2007 16:14:17 IST)
|
| |
ahh just enough!!! |
|
(posted on 23 Oct 2007 18:20:30 IST)
|
| |
IF PHYSICS IS A RELIGON CONCEPTS OF PHYSICS IS GOD!!!!!!!!! |
|
(posted on 27 Oct 2007 14:11:35 IST)
|
| |
very good book |
|
(posted on 28 Oct 2007 00:00:30 IST)
|
| |
I like GC aggarwal more. Better theory. More variety of problems. Am doing this too. |
|
(posted on 12 Nov 2007 12:40:51 IST)
|
| |
its a gud book with d easiest tu the most difficult ones...n wud say that it is beter than resnick n haliday n well represented, Maybe it requires a little more elaboration of the topics it contains and a little of the general guidelines but all over IT TOPS!!!! |
|
(posted on 12 Nov 2007 14:37:43 IST)
|
| |
simply a classic
|
|
(posted on 12 Nov 2007 22:04:35 IST)
|
| |
this book is gud for problems for concepts it is not as gud as halliday/walker -fundamentalsof physics. |
|
(posted on 12 Nov 2007 23:02:18 IST)
|
| |
ACCORDING TO ME, THIS BOOK IS A MUST FOR JEE PREPERATION |
|
(posted on 15 Nov 2007 14:28:09 IST)
|
| |
H.C. Verma explains certain sections very well But Resnick Halliday is much better for Theory.But Verma has googd conceptual questions. |
|
(posted on 17 Nov 2007 17:44:40 IST)
|
| |
arihant r better option |
|
(posted on 18 Nov 2007 17:14:27 IST)
|
| |
do we have solutions forconcepts oe physics |
|
(posted on 2 Dec 2007 19:54:11 IST)
|
| |
great book for AIEEE and necessary but not sufficient forIIT JEE |
|
(posted on 3 Dec 2007 15:19:46 IST)
|
| |
I Would agree with prateek on that |
|
|
|
|
|