Home » Ask & Discuss » Mathematics. » Algebra « Back to Discussion



Algebra

Anant Kumar's Avatar
Forum Expert
Joined: 10 Jul 2008
Post: 598
27 Nov 2008 04:23:36 IST
0 People liked this
13
1116 View Post
A difficult one dealing with polynomials
None

Let be a polynomial with real coefficients. Show that all the roots of are real if and only if CANNOT be written as the sum of squares of two polynomials with real coefficients, having unequal degrees.


Share this article on:

Comments (13)

Soumik's Avatar

Blazing goIITian

Joined: 31 Jul 2008
Posts: 1266
28 Nov 2008 14:54:26 IST
0 people liked this

Whoa.....what a problem!


Some solve it, it has started to come in my nightmares.....

Hari Shankar's Avatar

Forum Expert
Joined: 28 Feb 2007
Posts: 2173
28 Nov 2008 15:29:41 IST
0 people liked this

As a clue let me offer the identity:


(a^2-b^2)(c^2-d^2) = (ac+bd)^2-(ad+bc)^2

abhishek sinha's Avatar

Forum Expert
Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 926
28 Nov 2008 17:44:34 IST
0 people liked this

 The proof for the sufficient condition is very simple !


Suppose that on the contrary P(x)^2 can be expressed as a sum of two polynomials with real coeffs and unequal degrees . Let the polynomials be Q(x)and R(x)


so P(x)^2= Q(x)^2 + R(x)^2


let @i's be the i-th root (real) of P(x)


so P(@i)^2=0 = Q(@i)^2+R(@i)^2 ....................(1)


but since the coeffs of Q(x) and R(x) are real , eqn (1) can only hold when @i's are also the roots of both Q(x) and R(x), for all i's.


Thus we may write Q(x)=q(x)P(x)


and R(x)=r(x)P(x) ( q(x) and r(x) are any  two polynomials)




so the given condition becomes 


q^2(x) +r^2(x) = 1 ( for x!=@i's ) .........(2) 


for x!= @i's , this is an identity in x .


But since Q(x) and R(x) are of unequal degrees( hence q(x) and r(x)) ( and both of them being finite ), all the x's can't cancel (as the leading terms are different )for such an infinite number of x's .


Hence a contradiction .


 


Hence proved !!

abhishek sinha's Avatar

Forum Expert
Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 926
28 Nov 2008 17:48:15 IST
0 people liked this

 Another interesting thing is that if degrees of Q(x) and R(x) be allowed to attend infinity then the result does not hold !!


For example let q(x)= cos x 


r(x)= sin x  so


q^2(x) + r^2(x) = 1


and replace cos x and sin x by their infinite Mclaurin series representation !

Anant Kumar's Avatar

Forum Expert
Joined: 10 Jul 2008
Posts: 598
28 Nov 2008 21:37:53 IST
0 people liked this

And what is the meaning of "infinite degree"? Note the last condition that the degrees of the two polynomials should be unequal. So how would you compare the degrees of the Maclaurian series of sin and cos?


Anyway, the series expansion of sin and cos are not polynomials.

abhishek sinha's Avatar

Forum Expert
Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 926
29 Nov 2008 09:44:05 IST
0 people liked this

Note : The proof that I have given is for the necessary condition !


@ Kayamant :


Yes it is true !


It is assumed implicitly that the degree of polynomial must be finite ; So the above difficulty does not arise !!


Anyway what about the proof ? 


Blazing goIITian

Joined: 7 Aug 2007
Posts: 533
29 Nov 2008 12:26:22 IST
3 people liked this

This is the 'if' part : 

suppose  

suppose,  and  

let us assume that  

so,highest power of  in the polynomial  is  

so, degree of  is  itself. 

suppose  is a root of  

then we get that P(x_{o})^{2}=Q(x_{o})^{2}+R(x_{o})^{2} 

From here we arrive that  

but there should be  such real roots of 

But  can have a maximum of  roots and 

So, this is a contradiction!


 





Cool goIITian

Joined: 24 Oct 2007
Posts: 90
29 Nov 2008 23:48:58 IST
1 people liked this

for the second one ,


let us assume that the polynomial has an imaginary root p+iq


then as its all coefficients are real


it should have another root p-iq


let there be "n" number of other imaginary roots


we can write P(x)=((x-p)2+q2)G(x)


Where G(x) is a polynomial having real coefficients (as all other imaginary roots multiply to make the form a2+b2)


then P(x)2=((x-p)2+q2)2G(x)2


= ((x+p)2-q2)2G(x)2+(2*(x+p)(q))2G(x)2


let degree of G(x)=d


from the above , degree of first polynomial = d+2 whereas of second =d+1


but then it is expressible of the form of the given condition!!


hence if we take any root to be imaginary ,it is expressible of the given form but we have taken it not to be expressible


hence all roots are real!!


 


Cool goIITian

Joined: 24 Oct 2007
Posts: 90
30 Nov 2008 20:59:52 IST
0 people liked this

is it correct sir?


Cool goIITian

Joined: 24 Oct 2007
Posts: 90
30 Nov 2008 21:18:09 IST
0 people liked this

if it is wrong please point out..

Hari Shankar's Avatar

Forum Expert
Joined: 28 Feb 2007
Posts: 2173
1 Dec 2008 14:58:59 IST
1 people liked this

I think i had better explain what on earth i was thinking with that identity. First off, feynman and rajat have already wrapped up how with all roots real, you cannot write the polynomial as given


There are three cases:


(i) All roots are complex:


Since the coeffs are real, the roots come in conjugate pairs. So these pairs each produce a quadratic of the form m^2(x)+n^2


Multiplying them out, and using the lagrange indentity (a^2+b^2)(c^2+d^2) = (ac+bd)^2+(ad-bc)^2  repeatedly, we get P(x) = a [Q^2(x)+R^2(x)] and Q(x) and R(x) will differ in degree by 2.


So P^2(x) = a^2[Q^2(x)+R^2(x)]^2 = a^2 [(Q(x) - R(x))^2+(2Q(x) R(x))^2]


(ii) All roots are real: Already dealt with and I wanted to state that we get P^2(x) = Q^2(x) - R^2(x) in this case using the identity i posted.


(iii) Some roots are real: In that case P(x) = P_1(x) P_2(x) where P1(x) has all roots real and P2(x) has all roots complex.


We know P_2(x) = a [Q_2^2(x)+R_2^2(x)]


Now P_2^2(x) = a^2 [(Q_2^2(x)-R_2^2(x))^2+(2 Q_2(x) R_2(x))^2]


The crux being that P^2(x) = P_1^2(x) P_2^2(x) = (P^2(x) - Q^2(x))^2+(2P(x) Q(x))^2 the two square polynomials being of different degrees.


So is is only in the case when all roots are real that we cannot write P2(x) in given form.


New kid on the Block

Joined: 1 Dec 2008
Posts: 5
1 Dec 2008 15:04:24 IST
0 people liked this

god knows! I cant understand a bit :( sorry for all of you. pls can any body explain me?
Hari Shankar's Avatar

Forum Expert
Joined: 28 Feb 2007
Posts: 2173
1 Dec 2008 15:33:20 IST
0 people liked this

just realized that rohan2007 has given exactly the same idea. good work bro, yet again!




Quick Reply


Reply

Some HTML allowed.
Keep your comments above the belt or risk having them deleted.
Signup for a avatar to have your pictures show up by your comment
If Members see a thread that violates the Posting Rules, bring it to the attention of the Moderator Team
Free Sign Up!

Preparing for IIT-JEE ?

Arihant Revision Package for IIT JEE - Books, Practice Tests + Rank Predictor


@ INR 1,995/-

For Quick Info

Name

Mobile No.

Find Posts by Topics

Physics.

Topics

Mathematics.

Chemistry.

Biology

Parents

Board

Fun Zone

Sponsored Ads