Home » Ask & Discuss » Mathematics. » Algebra « Back to Discussion



Algebra

nishant singh's Avatar
Blazing goIITian

Joined: 23 Feb 2007
Post: 424
23 Feb 2007 16:52:54 IST
0 People liked this
20
1388 View Post
a good one
None

a natural number n is such that if the left most digit of the number is removed its
value becomes n/57, then what is the sum of digits of this number???


Share this article on:

Comments (20)

  • 1
  • 2
  • GO
  • Go to Page...
pink_ele's Avatar

Blazing goIITian

Joined: 16 Jan 2007
Posts: 1836
23 Feb 2007 22:46:12 IST
0 people liked this

let the no. obtained by ommiting the digit be x then
57x=(let)abcdef........              (i)
X=bcdef.........            (ii)
Subtracting (ii) from (i)
56x=a000000000000000....(no.of digits in number)
X=a0000000000000/56
For x to be an integer
a=7and no of digits greter than 4
x=7000....
57x=399000.........
Depends on no of digits
Hope this is correct
pink_ele's Avatar

Blazing goIITian

Joined: 16 Jan 2007
Posts: 1836
23 Feb 2007 22:47:49 IST
0 people liked this

let the no. obtained by ommiting the digit be x then
57x=(let)abcdef????.               (i)
X=bcdef??????..             (ii)
Subtracting (ii) from (i)
56x=a000000000000000??..(noif digits in no)
X=a0000000000000/56
For x to be an integer
a=7and no of digits greter than 4
x=7000???.
57x=399000???????..
Depends on no of digits
Hope this is correct

Blazing goIITian

Joined: 31 Jan 2007
Posts: 780
23 Feb 2007 23:04:36 IST
0 people liked this

my answer is :
"no such number exists"
nishant singh's Avatar

Blazing goIITian

Joined: 23 Feb 2007
Posts: 424
24 Feb 2007 12:26:50 IST
0 people liked this

no there is such a number ,
let me give you the options to make things simpler

a) 15
b)18
c) 24
d) 30
Manasi's Avatar

Forum Expert
Joined: 1 Dec 2006
Posts: 2108
24 Feb 2007 12:58:01 IST
0 people liked this

hey hey... that was my question ...even i hav asked it once
Manasi's Avatar

Forum Expert
Joined: 1 Dec 2006
Posts: 2108
24 Feb 2007 12:58:54 IST
0 people liked this

pink_ele's Avatar

Blazing goIITian

Joined: 16 Jan 2007
Posts: 1836
24 Feb 2007 16:42:52 IST
0 people liked this

what about the answer i have given. experts please comment.
edison's Avatar

Forum Expert
Joined: 19 Oct 2006
Posts: 7537
24 Feb 2007 16:57:24 IST
0 people liked this

Hi pink_ele
 
You have nicely put ur brain but with the results i found some discrepancy as u obtained
 
x=7000???.
57x=399000???????..
 
now read the question it says
 
a natural number n is such that if the left most digit of the number is removed its
value becomes n/57, then what is the sum of digits of this number???
 
Now if u drop the leftmost digit from the number which is 57x = 399000...???
 
it becomes 990000......... which is not equal to x = 7000????
 
anyways good attempt keep it up
 
at the same time to nishantsingh89  i am trying out its solution.


Blazing goIITian

Joined: 31 Jan 2007
Posts: 780
24 Feb 2007 17:06:09 IST
0 people liked this

may be i have not understood your question properly.because i am a bit doubtfull about my interpretation of the statement "its value becomes n/57"
but if you take each of the numbers given and apply to it the condition ,none of the options seem to satisfy it
for example take n=15 .remove the leftmost digit i.e 1
then its valur becomes 5 which is not equal to n/57 i.e 15/57
same hold true for other options as well.
 
so plzz. reply if i am making a mistake anywhere
Umang's Avatar

Blazing goIITian

Joined: 12 Dec 2006
Posts: 926
24 Feb 2007 17:36:32 IST
0 people liked this

Hey !
just see manasi's post . The experts hav given many such numbers , and the sum will be diff. for different numbers . So , there will be many answers !!!

Hot goIITian

Joined: 24 Jan 2007
Posts: 172
24 Feb 2007 22:00:49 IST
0 people liked this

i finally got the answer after half an hour of time waste
the number is 7125 and the sum as u wud have guessed is
7 + 1 + 2 + 5 = 15.
Enjoy
this question does not require any knowledge of formulae. just logic.

Hot goIITian

Joined: 24 Jan 2007
Posts: 172
24 Feb 2007 22:01:55 IST
0 people liked this

there is one and only one answer dude....
the numbers given 157,257 etc in manasi's post do not give an integer on dividing by 57

Hot goIITian

Joined: 24 Jan 2007
Posts: 172
24 Feb 2007 22:15:40 IST
0 people liked this

let number be
a(10^n) + b(10^n-1) ....
now according to given condition
[a(10^n) + b(10^n-1) ....]/57 =  b(10^n-1) +....
this implies
a(10^n) = 56[b(10^n-1) +....]          (1)
this simply means that 56 on multiplying to a certain number
gives a0000000...
let the number in square brackets in RHS of (1)
be xyzwrt
so 56 * xyzwrt = xyzwrt
                        *     56
now there is only one value of t which gives 0 with six in multiplication
i'e 5 since 5*6 = 30 (3 goes in carry over)
thinking in a similar way we can asses that if r is 2 then we will get a 0 again
one can continue like this to get the complete number
but the options clearly suggest the number isn't very big so i just started putting arbitrary numbers from 0 to 9 before 25 to get that 125*56 = 7000
that did it ! 
i don't know if their is any other method to solve this

Hot goIITian

Joined: 24 Jan 2007
Posts: 172
25 Feb 2007 00:02:57 IST
0 people liked this

hi rajat,
the question is just this
u have a number n
u remove the left most digit
u get a natural number which is same as n/57
the question is to find the sum of digits in the number (not the number itself)
so as i mentioned 15 is the answer
pink_ele's Avatar

Blazing goIITian

Joined: 16 Jan 2007
Posts: 1836
25 Feb 2007 12:51:39 IST
0 people liked this

sorry i commited a mistake
here is the ans
let the no. obtained by ommiting the digit be x then
57x=(let)abcdef????.               (i)
X=bcdef??????..             (ii)
Subtracting (ii) from (i)
56x=a000000000000000??..(noif digits in no)
X=a0000000000000/56
For x to be an integer
a=7and no of digits greter than 4
x=1250000???.
57x=7125000???????..
smallest such no. is57x=7125
Depends on no of digits
Hope this is correct

Hot goIITian

Joined: 24 Jan 2007
Posts: 172
25 Feb 2007 13:27:44 IST
0 people liked this

hey i hav already posted the smallest number it is ..7125
see remove 7 u get 125 which is nothing but 7125/57
rite...!!!
nishant singh's Avatar

Blazing goIITian

Joined: 23 Feb 2007
Posts: 424
25 Feb 2007 15:08:57 IST
0 people liked this

HI
I FIGURED OUT THE SOLUTION MYSELF WHICH I AM POSTING HERE

LET,
N= a(10^x-1)+ b*(10^x-2)...............................................................---- (1)

N/57= b*(10^x-2)............................................................... ----(2)

(2) - (1)

56N/57= a(10^x-1)

basically 56n/57= a000000000000000000..............

therefore,
n= 57* (a00000000000000000000000000.......) / 56

or
n= 57*(a00000000000000000000000000...)/7*8

since n is a natural number therefore a00000000000... must be divisible by 56, i.e 7*8 (57= 19*3 it doesnt have any common factors as that of 56)

therefore a must equal to 7

n= 57*(700000000000000..........)/7*8
now to be divisible by 8 and be an integral power of 10 , such smallest number is 1000
n= 57*(7* 10000000000000000...)/7*8
cancelling the common terms

n= 57* 12500000000000000....

n= 7125000000000000000....

now we have to calculate sum of digits which will be
7+1+2+5+0+0+0+..........=15
thus 15 is the answer ,

thanks for help

now

Bipin Dubey's Avatar

Forum Expert
Joined: 23 Jan 2007
Posts: 7942
25 Feb 2007 15:18:02 IST
0 people liked this

Let the leftmost no. be a and its palce value to be a*10b .

After removing the leftmost digit the remaining no. is divisible by 57 hence n must be odd.

As per the question :   a*10b + (n/57) = n

=>   57*a*10b = 56n

=>   (19).(3a).(5b).(2b-3.23) = (7).(23).n

=>   (19).(3a).(5b).(2b-3) = 7n

Since n is odd then RHS will also be odd.
Hence LHS must be odd implies power of 2 should be zero.

Hence   b-3 = 0   =>   b = 3

Putting this above we get
(19).(3a).(125) = 7n

=>   7125a = 7n

Since 7125 is not divisible by 7 and RHS has 7 as a factor then a must be 7.

Hence n comes out to be 7125.

Sum of digits = 15

Hope its clear now.

Best Wishes

pink_ele's Avatar

Blazing goIITian

Joined: 16 Jan 2007
Posts: 1836
25 Feb 2007 21:58:42 IST
0 people liked this

 
sorry, my method is correct and easier but
 i commited a mistake, as its my habit 
here is the ans
let the no. obtained by ommiting the digit be x then
57x=(let)abcdef....              (i)
X=bcdef....            (ii)
Subtracting (ii) from (i)
56x=a000000000000000...(noif digits in no)
X=a0000000000000/56
For x to be an integer
a=7and no of digits greter than 4
x=1250000...
57x=7125000....
smallest such no. is57x=7125
cheers!
i am sorry again
Depends on no of digits



Quick Reply


Reply

Some HTML allowed.
Keep your comments above the belt or risk having them deleted.
Signup for a avatar to have your pictures show up by your comment
If Members see a thread that violates the Posting Rules, bring it to the attention of the Moderator Team
Free Sign Up!

Preparing for IIT-JEE ?

Arihant Revision Package for IIT JEE - Books, Practice Tests + Rank Predictor


@ INR 1,995/-

For Quick Info

Name

Mobile No.

Find Posts by Topics

Physics.

Topics

Mathematics.

Chemistry.

Biology

Parents

Board

Fun Zone

Sponsored Ads