sign up I login
 advanced
refer a friend - earn nickels!!

Ask & Discuss Questions with Community & Experts

Moderation Team
 90 chars left    advanced
Ask iit jee aieee pet cbse icse state board community Community Discussion Question: again an open challenge to all community members and experts
Forum Index -> Algebra like the article? email it to a friend.  
Author Message
x2008 (4)

Cool goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 0  [2 rates]

x2008's Avatar

total posts: 54    
offline Offline

solve 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 +   ….∞

    
pantpranav (367)

Scorching goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 61  [92 rates]

pantpranav's Avatar

total posts: 281    
offline Offline

Sorry this is not an equation, so I cannot solve it.


But the expression has the value: n(n+1)/2

 this reply: 2 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 1 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
rudra.panda (2559)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 437  [624 rates]

rudra.panda's Avatar

total posts: 2533    
offline Offline
it is infinity only.

God does not care about our mathematical difficulties. He integrates empirically. ~~~Albert Einstein (1879-1955)~~~~
To divide a cube into two other cubes, a fourth power or in general any power whatever into two powers of the same denomination above the second is impossible, and I have assuredly found an admirable proof of this, but the margin is too narrow to contain it.~~~Pierre de Fermat (1601-1665)~~~

 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
krish1092 (528)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 84  [138 rates]

krish1092's Avatar

total posts: 343    
offline Offline
it is infinity
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
most.happening (11)

Cool goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 1  [4 rates]

most.happening's Avatar

total posts: 61    
offline Offline
what a dumb challenge..................logically infinite
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
hsbhatt (5015)

Forum Expert Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 945  [1090 rates]

hsbhatt's Avatar

total posts: 1508    
online Online

The answer is \boxed{-\frac{1}{12}} by Ramanujan Summation.


Check out http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divergent_series The foot of the article mentions summation of 1+2+3+...


Also see http://www.goiit.com/posts/list/differenciation-so-you-thought-you-were-good-at-numbers-44321.htm for a lively discussion we had earlier on this matter.


Entertainment Guaranteed!


Moral: Never jump to hasty conclusions about people


Time wounds all heels
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
rudra.panda (2559)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 437  [624 rates]

rudra.panda's Avatar

total posts: 2533    
offline Offline

Consider the sum . Let this sum equal S. Then:









If we take the limit as r approaches 1,

Now, let . Then and , so and


Quite an interesting topic......................


God does not care about our mathematical difficulties. He integrates empirically. ~~~Albert Einstein (1879-1955)~~~~
To divide a cube into two other cubes, a fourth power or in general any power whatever into two powers of the same denomination above the second is impossible, and I have assuredly found an admirable proof of this, but the margin is too narrow to contain it.~~~Pierre de Fermat (1601-1665)~~~

 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
rudra.panda (2559)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 437  [624 rates]

rudra.panda's Avatar

total posts: 2533    
offline Offline

sorry forgot to mention the source. http://www.mathlinks.ro/viewtopic.php?t=78489


God does not care about our mathematical difficulties. He integrates empirically. ~~~Albert Einstein (1879-1955)~~~~
To divide a cube into two other cubes, a fourth power or in general any power whatever into two powers of the same denomination above the second is impossible, and I have assuredly found an admirable proof of this, but the margin is too narrow to contain it.~~~Pierre de Fermat (1601-1665)~~~

 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
rudra.panda (2559)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 437  [624 rates]

rudra.panda's Avatar

total posts: 2533    
offline Offline

Have a look at this:


\frac{f\left( 0\right) }{2}+f\left( 1\right) +\cdots+f\left( n-1\right) +<br/>\frac{f\left( n\right) }{2}<br/>=\frac{f\left( 0\right) +f\left( n\right) }{2}+\sum_{k=1}^{n-1}f\left(<br/>k\right) = \int_0^n f(x)\,dx + \sum_{k=1}^p\frac{B_{k+1}}{(k+1)!}\left(f^{(k)}(n)-f^{(k)}(0)\right)+R
or simply:

f\left( 1\right)+f\left( 2\right) +\cdots+f\left( n-2\right) + f\left( n-1\right)= C + \int_1^n f(x)\,dx + \sum_{k=1}^\infty\frac{B_{k+1}}{(k+1)!}\left(f^{(k)}(n)-f^{(k)}(0)\right)

 


Where C is a constant specific to the series and its analytic continuum. This he proposes to use as the sum of the divergent sequence. It is like a bridge between summation and integration. Using standard extensions for known divergent series, he calculated "Ramanujan summation" of those. In particular, the sum of 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + · · · is


    1+2+3+\cdots = -\frac{1}{12} (\Re)


 


(Wikipedia)


God does not care about our mathematical difficulties. He integrates empirically. ~~~Albert Einstein (1879-1955)~~~~
To divide a cube into two other cubes, a fourth power or in general any power whatever into two powers of the same denomination above the second is impossible, and I have assuredly found an admirable proof of this, but the margin is too narrow to contain it.~~~Pierre de Fermat (1601-1665)~~~

 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
feynmann (2236)

Forum Expert Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 404  [512 rates]

feynmann's Avatar

total posts: 815    
offline Offline

Hey , Rudra would u plz kindly let us know that how have u taken the limit ?


The summation formula that u have used is valid only for r<1 ( and clearly the RHL as r->1+ does not exist !! )


 

 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
GoNik (197)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 31  [52 rates]

GoNik's Avatar

total posts: 964    
offline Offline
yaaaaaaaaaar the graph takes it to infinity....how could that be then??....the graph doesnt stop at any point....wat say??

i am well....and hope u r in the same well....
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
GoNik (197)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 31  [52 rates]

GoNik's Avatar

total posts: 964    
offline Offline
that limit that was applied went for r----->1.......how can u add to T..??.....they are 2 different expressions..correct me kindly if i am wrong....

i am well....and hope u r in the same well....
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
GoNik (197)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 31  [52 rates]

GoNik's Avatar

total posts: 964    
offline Offline
reply pleeeeeeeeez

i am well....and hope u r in the same well....
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
prodyumno_a24 (84)

Hot goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 12  [24 rates]

prodyumno_a24's Avatar

total posts: 161