| Author |
Message |
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 27 Feb 2008 14:48:04 IST
|
|
|
if x,y,z>0
prove that
2/(x+y) + 2/(y+z) + 2/(z+x) >= 9/(x+y+z)
|
Impossible To be Impossible is Impossible |
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 27 Feb 2008 14:59:30 IST
|
|
|
let x+y=a x+z=b y+z=c using AM>=HM 3abc/(ab+bc+ca)<=a+b+c/3 rearranging 9/a+b+c<=ab+bc+ca/abc 9/(a+b+c)<=1/a+1/b+1/c a+b+c= 2(x+y+z) 1/2(2/a+2/b+2/c)>=9/2(x+y+z) or 2/a+2/b+2/c>=9/x+y+z 2/(x+y)+2/(y+z)+2/(x+y)>= 9/(x+y+z) hence proved
|
" Always remember money isn't everything but make sure you have made a lot of it before talking such nonsense!"
- Bill Gates |
this reply: 7 points
(with 1 
in 2 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 27 Feb 2008 15:02:44 IST
|
|
|
well done but there is another method that i am looking for and it is really short
|
Impossible To be Impossible is Impossible |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 27 Feb 2008 15:07:27 IST
|
|
|
1/x+y + 1/y+z + 1/z+x is in L.H.S
or we have (x+y)-1 + (y+z)-1 + (z+x)-1
3 [ (x+y) + (y+z) + (z+x)/3 ] -1 So R.H.S = 3 [2(x+y+z)/3] -1
or 3 [ 3/ 2(x+y+z) ] = 9/2(x+y+z)
So 2 [ 1/x+y + 1/y+z + 1/z+x ] 9/(x+y+z)
Inequality used :
(x m + y m + z m + ...............) / n [(x+y+z........)/n] m
|
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
From J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Lord of the Rings':
All that is gold does not glitter
Not all who wander are lost
The old that is strong does not wither,
Deep roots are not reached by frost.
From ashes a fire shall be woken
From shadows a light shall spring
Renewed shall be blade that's broken
The crown less again shall be king. |
this reply: 12 points
(with 2 
in 3 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 27 Feb 2008 15:11:27 IST
|
|
|
we are seeing good methods here but there is one more way lets see who does it by that method
|
Impossible To be Impossible is Impossible |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 27 Feb 2008 15:27:41 IST
|
|
|
We can use anothr one
x+y+z = a
So a - x , a - y , a - z 0
So A.M H.M
We have ,
[3a - (x+y+z)] / 3 3/ [ 1/a-x + 1/a-y + 1/a-z ]
or 2a/3 3/ [ 1/a-x+ 1/a-y+1/a-z)]
or 1/a-x+ 1/a-y+1/a-z 9/2a
or 1/x+y + 1/y+z + 1/z+x 9/2a
I am not totally sure whether we can use the sign.......
I have a little doubt over that coloured step.
|
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
From J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Lord of the Rings':
All that is gold does not glitter
Not all who wander are lost
The old that is strong does not wither,
Deep roots are not reached by frost.
From ashes a fire shall be woken
From shadows a light shall spring
Renewed shall be blade that's broken
The crown less again shall be king. |
this reply: 5 points
(with 1 
in 1 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 27 Feb 2008 15:31:44 IST
|
|
|
still there is another (here is the hint) very short method
|
Impossible To be Impossible is Impossible |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 27 Feb 2008 15:40:03 IST
|
|
|
Are you thinking of this way that since x,y,z > 0,
So we can consider that they are sides of a triangle and that
the sum of two sides is greater than the third side?
and then do the remaining?
or we can use this as well (x + y + z)(1/x + 1/y + 1/z) 9
I can't think of any shorter way!   
|
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
From J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Lord of the Rings':
All that is gold does not glitter
Not all who wander are lost
The old that is strong does not wither,
Deep roots are not reached by frost.
From ashes a fire shall be woken
From shadows a light shall spring
Renewed shall be blade that's broken
The crown less again shall be king. |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 27 Feb 2008 15:41:48 IST
|
|
|
he he no man
|
Impossible To be Impossible is Impossible |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 27 Feb 2008 15:42:08 IST
|
|
|
should i post the method??
|
Impossible To be Impossible is Impossible |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 27 Feb 2008 17:10:34 IST
|
|
|
yeah plz do
|
" Always remember money isn't everything but make sure you have made a lot of it before talking such nonsense!"
- Bill Gates |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 27 Feb 2008 17:42:39 IST
|
|
|
consider the nos. 2/(x+y) , 2/(y+z) and 2/(z+x)
AM>=HM
(2/(x+y) + 2/(y+z) + 2/(z+x) ) / 3 >= 3/(x+y+z)
that is it . direct
|
this reply: 5 points
(with 1 
in 1 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 27 Feb 2008 18:34:22 IST
|
|
|
ya nadeem is rit...shortest 1 do we hve to only use A.M. > G.M.> H.M. only... in these type of prob... isnt there any other methud
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 27 Feb 2008 18:53:35 IST
|
|
|
all of u have done it the right way so pls don't shout at me. i had also done it through A.M.>=H.M. but i found a new method to do this problem hence i am sharing it with u. (all the above methods are excellent and the method i am posting is nothing great)---- heres it-- using lemma which states that x^2 + y^2 >= (x+y)^2 --- ---- --------- a b a+b we can change the eqn to 1 + 1 + 1 ---------- --------- --------- (x+y)/2 (y+z)/2 (z+x)/2 which is >= (1+1+1)^2 -------------- which is the answer [(x+y+y+z+z+x)/2]
|
Impossible To be Impossible is Impossible |
this reply: 12 points
(with 2 
in 3 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
|
|