physics chemistry maths science forums
become expert I help I sign up I login
refer a friend - earn nickels!!   
 advanced
 
Home
Ask & Discuss Questions
Study Material
Experts Zone
Hang Out!

Ask & Discuss Questions with Community & Experts

Moderation Team
 90 chars left    advanced
Ask iit jee aieee pet cbse icse state board community Community Discussion Question: find the no. of digits
Forum Index -> Algebra like the article? email it to a friend.  
Author Message
srujana (3045)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 549  [699 rates]

srujana's Avatar

total posts: 821    
offline Offline
...find the no.of digits in
        
         42
25616            divided by......     
 
       3
819
 

God has given you one face, and you
make yourself another.
~William Shakespeare

You were born an original. Don't die a copy.
~John Mason
    
nunoxic (1401)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 217  [375 rates]

nunoxic's Avatar

total posts: 1148    
offline Offline
Find the no of digits in 256 to the power 16 to the power 4 to the power 2 divided by 27 to the power 9 to the power 3

the numerator will simplify to :
=2 ^ 8 ^ 16 ^ 4 ^ 2
=2 ^ 1024

the denominator will simplify to
=3 ^ 3 ^ 9 ^ 3
=3 ^ 81

let us assume
y = the given sum
log y = 1024 log 2 - 81 log 3
=1024 * 0.3010 - 81 * 0.4771 (these are values u shud know)
=308.224 - 38.6451
=269.5789

thus y will be antilog (269.5789)
log 4 is 0.6021
thus the answer will be around
3. ?? x 10^ 269
thus no of digits must be 270

I have used a very crude way.....
refer to it only if the answer is correct cuz i am not sure whether it can be done this way

Please Rate If Useful

Sometimes One Dream Is Enough To Light Up The Entire October Sky....

First Year Mechanical Engineering
Veermata Jijabai Technological Institute
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
sankydreams (958)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 160  [239 rates]

sankydreams's Avatar

total posts: 813    
offline Offline
Well its something even divided by a multiple of three. Thus it wud be an irrational term with infinite digits.Well i think so.

Put your hand on a stove for a minute and it seems like an hour. Sit with that special girl for an hour and it seems like a minute. That's relativity.
-Albert Einstein

Generally people who take the piss out of other people hang around in groups of five, because they have a fifth of a personality each.
- Eddie Izzard

It's my life
And it's now or never
I ain't gonna live forever
I just wanna live while I'm alive
-Bon Jovi

By the time a son realizes that his father was probably right, he has a son who thinks he is wrong.
-Anonymous
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
umang (229)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 35  [62 rates]

umang's Avatar

total posts: 873    
offline Offline
Hey  nuxoric !
u r wrong at this step -
2 ^ 8 ^ 16 ^ 4 ^ 2
=2 ^ 1024
this is wrong !!!
 u hav done  2^8*16*4*2 !!!!!
 
pls check ur solution !!!

Umang
 this reply: 2 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 1 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
rahulvedanta (80)

Cool goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 14  [19 rates]

rahulvedanta's Avatar

total posts: 85    
offline Offline
wrong question cannot be solved quickly
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
MUDIT (614)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 110  [142 rates]

MUDIT's Avatar

total posts: 324    
offline Offline
THE ANSWER SHOULD BE 270 DIGITS
SOLUTION
256 TO THE POWER OF 16 TO THE POWER OF 4 TO THE POWER OF 2 DIVIDED BY 27 TO THE POWER OF 9 TO THE POWER OF 3 CAN BE REDUCED TO 2 THE POWER OF 8x2x4x16 DIVIDED BY 3 TO THE POWER OF 3X3X9.

THIS COMES TO 2 TO THE POWER OF 1024 DIVIDED BY 3 TO THE POWER OF 81.

USING LOGS WE GET 1024log2 - 81log3. TAKING THE VALUES OF log2 AS 0.3010 AND log3 AS 0.4771 WE GET

logx=308.224 - 38.645 WHERE x IS THE REMAINDER
SOLVING THIS WE GET x AS ANTILOG OF 269.579
x WILL THUS HAVE 270 DIGITS

FAILURE, THE FIRST STEP TO SUCCESS
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
MUDIT (614)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 110  [142 rates]

MUDIT's Avatar

total posts: 324    
offline Offline
PLEASE RATE IF YOU FOUND THE ANSWER SATISFACTORY.

FAILURE, THE FIRST STEP TO SUCCESS
 this reply: 7 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 2 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
srujana (3045)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 549  [699 rates]

srujana's Avatar

total posts: 821    
offline Offline
Sorry but the question should be...find the no.of digits in
        
         42
25616            divided by......     
 
       3
819
 
 

God has given you one face, and you
make yourself another.
~William Shakespeare

You were born an original. Don't die a copy.
~John Mason
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
nunoxic (1401)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 217  [375 rates]

nunoxic's Avatar

total posts: 1148    
offline Offline
my solution is right i think
wats the answer srujana ??

btw,
[ A ^ m ] ^ n = A ^ mn

Sometimes One Dream Is Enough To Light Up The Entire October Sky....

First Year Mechanical Engineering
Veermata Jijabai Technological Institute
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
srujana (3045)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 549  [699 rates]

srujana's Avatar

total posts: 821    
offline Offline
I dont know the answer nunoxic but see ur statement once

[ A ^ m ] ^ n = A ^ mn
the above holds true only when a^m is taken as a whole

i.e.,a to the power m whole to the power n is a power mn.........or 256 to the power 64 whole to the power of 8 is equal to 256 to the power 64*8......

but here we dont take 256 to the power 64 as whole.....

hope u have understood.......................plz try another method

God has given you one face, and you
make yourself another.
~William Shakespeare

You were born an original. Don't die a copy.
~John Mason
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
srujana (3045)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 549  [699 rates]

srujana's Avatar

total posts: 821    
offline Offline
129 views and still no answer............somebody please answer it.

God has given you one face, and you
make yourself another.
~William Shakespeare

You were born an original. Don't die a copy.
~John Mason
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
punterjack (108)

Hot goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 14  [33 rates]

punterjack's Avatar

total posts: 142    
offline Offline
 Then why dont u do the problem the way mudit has sugested u.
on taking the log of the expression on gets 1024log 2 - 108 log 3
on taking log 2=.3 and log 3=.4771 as mudit sugested one gets the final log
values as log 251.6732 which means that the number has 252 digits if i amnt
mistaken  or if i am wrong u could use the method that mudit sugested. 



 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
iamgodofdeath131 (9)

New kid on the Block

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 1  [3 rates]

iamgodofdeath131's Avatar

total posts: 9    
offline Offline
The no of digits in
                                       2
                                    4
                               16
                         256
divided by
                               3
                             9
                         81
 
is either 17 or 32
Two answer are bcoz one is excluding the digits after decimal that is 17 and other one is includng digits after decimal that is 32.
         if u hav got the correct answer then pls give me rate.I think that i am correct becoz I hav halfly solved it with mathematics  mind that is by taking "LOG" and halfly with clanguage mind.
Can u tell me the proper method of it.
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
a_buddy4uin06 (30)

Cool goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 4  [9 rates]

a_buddy4uin06's Avatar

total posts: 53    
offline Offline
hiiiiiiii.......
this is jus mudits idea.. but i  m jus correcting d small mistake he did..

log  x = 1616log256 - 729log81

now if we compute d value...
but i wud like to kno if we can get this ans easily.. cos computing 1616is time consumin..........
 this reply: 2 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 1 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate