physics chemistry maths science forums
become expert I help I sign up I login
refer a friend - earn nickels!!   
 advanced
 
Home
Ask & Discuss Questions
Study Material
Experts Zone
Hang Out!

Ask & Discuss Questions with Community & Experts

Moderation Team
 90 chars left    advanced
Ask iit jee aieee pet cbse icse state board community Community Discussion Question: Let x and y be uniformly distributed, independent random variables on [0,1
Forum Index -> Algebra like the article? email it to a friend.  
Author Message
sneha.bagri (142)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 24  [35 rates]

sneha.bagri's Avatar

total posts: 378    
offline Offline

Let x and y be uniformly distributed, independent random variables on [0,1]. The probability that the distance between x and y is less than 1/2 is


1) 2/3


2)1/4


3)3/4


4)1/3


Its urgent.

    
budokai_tenkaichi_returns (394)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 62  [104 rates]

budokai_tenkaichi_returns's Avatar

total posts: 831    
offline Offline

i know it .


its geometrical probability ..


just find the ratio of area 1 by area 2


area 1 : graph plotted by |x-y|<1/2


area 2 : area of square ,,..centre origin .and sides of length 2 units ...


 


SAIYANS ARE OF TRUE WARRIOR RACE . DONT UNDER-ESTIMATE US!
special theory of relativity ....i luv it...
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
budokai_tenkaichi_returns (394)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 62  [104 rates]

budokai_tenkaichi_returns's Avatar

total posts: 831    
offline Offline

hope u r gettin  it


SAIYANS ARE OF TRUE WARRIOR RACE . DONT UNDER-ESTIMATE US!
special theory of relativity ....i luv it...
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
budokai_tenkaichi_returns (394)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 62  [104 rates]

budokai_tenkaichi_returns's Avatar

total posts: 831    
offline Offline

i  m gettin 1/3 ..maybe


SAIYANS ARE OF TRUE WARRIOR RACE . DONT UNDER-ESTIMATE US!
special theory of relativity ....i luv it...
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
sneha.bagri (142)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 24  [35 rates]

sneha.bagri's Avatar

total posts: 378    
offline Offline
i m not gettin u
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
budokai_tenkaichi_returns (394)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 62  [104 rates]

budokai_tenkaichi_returns's Avatar

total posts: 831    
offline Offline

ok do u know sumthing abt geometrical probability ..


(maybe my ans is wrong ..but my approach is correct)


SAIYANS ARE OF TRUE WARRIOR RACE . DONT UNDER-ESTIMATE US!
special theory of relativity ....i luv it...
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
sneha.bagri (142)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 24  [35 rates]

sneha.bagri's Avatar

total posts: 378    
offline Offline
no i dont
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
budokai_tenkaichi_returns (394)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 62  [104 rates]

budokai_tenkaichi_returns's Avatar

total posts: 831    
offline Offline

ok ..


then lemme ...


wait for a while ..


SAIYANS ARE OF TRUE WARRIOR RACE . DONT UNDER-ESTIMATE US!
special theory of relativity ....i luv it...
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
budokai_tenkaichi_returns (394)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 62  [104 rates]

budokai_tenkaichi_returns's Avatar

total posts: 831    
offline Offline

accha ..is my ans rite


SAIYANS ARE OF TRUE WARRIOR RACE . DONT UNDER-ESTIMATE US!
special theory of relativity ....i luv it...
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
budokai_tenkaichi_returns (394)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 62  [104 rates]

budokai_tenkaichi_returns's Avatar

total posts: 831    
offline Offline


























































































































































































dont read this


Geometric


Probability mass function



Geometricpdf.jpg
Cumulative distribution function



Geometriccdf.jpg
Parameters 0< p \leq 1 success probability (real)
Support k \in \{1,2,3,\dots\}\!
Probability mass function (pmf) (1 - p)^{k-1}\,p\!
Cumulative distribution function (cdf) 1-(1 - p)^k\!
Mean \frac{1}{p}\!
Median \left\lceil \frac{-\log(2)}{\log(1-p)} \right\rceil\! (not unique if - log(2) / log(1 - p) is an integer)
Mode 1
Variance \frac{1-p}{p^2}\!
Skewness \frac{2-p}{\sqrt{1-p}}\!
Excess kurtosis 6+\frac{p^2}{1-p}\!
Entropy -\frac{1-p}{p}\ln(1-p)-\ln p\!
Moment-generating function (mgf) \frac{pe^{t}}{1-(1-p) e^t}\!
Characteristic function \frac{pe^{it}}{1-q\,e^{it}}\! (where q = 1 - p)

 


In probability theory and statistics, the geometric distribution is either of two discrete probability distributions:


 




  • the probability distribution of the number X of Bernoulli trials needed to get one success, supported on the set { 1, 2, 3, ...}, or




 




  • the probability distribution of the number Y = X − 1 of failures before the first success, supported on the set { 0, 1, 2, 3, ... }.




 


Which of these one calls "the" geometric distribution is a matter of convention and convenience.


 


These two different geometric distributions should not be confused with each other. Often, the name shifted geometric distribution is adopted for the latter one (distribution of the number Y); however, to avoid ambiguity, it is considered wise to indicate which is intended, by mentioning the range explicitly.


 


If the probability of success on each trial is p, then the probability that k trials are needed to get one success is


 


\Pr(X = k) = (1 - p)^{k-1}\,p\,

 


for k = 1, 2, 3, ....


 


Equivalently, if the probability of success on each trial is p, then the probability that there are k failures before the first success is


 


\Pr(Y=k) = (1 - p)^k\,p\,

 


for k = 0, 1, 2, 3, ....


 


In either case, the sequence of probabilities is a geometric sequence.


 


For example, suppose an ordinary die is thrown repeatedly until the first time a "1" appears. The probability distribution of the number of times it is thrown is supported on the infinite set { 1, 2, 3, ... } and is a geometric distribution with p = 1/6.


 



 


Moments and cumulants


 


The expected value of a geometrically distributed random variable X is 1/p and the variance is (1 − p)/p2:


 


\mathrm{E}(X) = \frac{1}{p},  \qquad\mathrm{var}(X) = \frac{1-p}{p^2}.

 


Similarly, the expected value of the geometrically distributed random variable Y is (1 - p) / p, and its variance is (1 - p) / p2:


 


\mathrm{E}(Y) = \frac{1-p}{p},  \qquad\mathrm{var}(Y) = \frac{1-p}{p^2}.

 


Let μ = (1 - p) / p be the expected value of Y. Then the cumulants κn of the probability distribution of Y satisfy the recursion


 


\kappa_{n+1} = \mu(\mu+1) \frac{d\kappa_n}{d\mu}.

 



 


Parameter estimation


 


For both variants of the geometric distribution, the parameter p can be estimated by equating the expected value with the sample mean. This is the method of moments, which in this case happens to yield maximum likelihood estimates of p.


 


Specifically, for the first variant let k1,...,kn be a sample where k_i \geq 1 for i = 1,...,n. Then p can be estimated as


 


\widehat{p} = \left(\frac1n \sum_{i=1}^n k_i\right)^{-1}. \!

 


In Bayesian inference, the Beta distribution is the conjugate prior distribution for the parameter p. If this parameter is given a Beta(αβ) prior, then the posterior distribution is


 


p \sim \mathrm{Beta}\left(\alpha+n,\ \beta+\sum_{i=1}^n (k_i-1)\right). \!

 


The posterior mean E[p] approaches the maximum likelihood estimate \widehat{p} as α and β approach zero.


 


In the alternative case, let k1,...,kn be a sample where k_i \geq 0 for i = 1,...,n. Then p can be estimated as


 


\widehat{p} = \left(1 + \frac1n \sum_{i=1}^n k_i\right)^{-1}. \!

 


The posterior distribution of p given a Beta(αβ) prior is


 


p \sim \mathrm{Beta}\left(\alpha+n,\ \beta+\sum_{i=1}^n k_i\right). \!

 


Again the posterior mean E[p] approaches the maximum likelihood estimate \widehat{p} as α and β approach zero.


 



 


Other properties


 



 


G_X(s) = \frac{s\,p}{1-s\,(1-p)}, \!
G_Y(s) = \frac{p}{1-s\,(1-p)}, \quad |s| < (1-p)^{-1}. \!

 




  • Like its continuous analogue (the exponential distribution), the geometric distribution is memoryless. That means that if you intend to repeat an experiment until the first success, then, given that the first success has not yet occurred, the conditional probability distribution of the number of additional trials does not depend on how many failures have been observed. The die one throws or the coin one tosses does not have a "memory" of these failures. The geometric distribution is in fact the only memoryless discrete distribution.




 




  • Among all discrete probability distributions supported on {1, 2, 3, ... } with given expected value μ, the geometric distribution X with parameter p = 1/μ is the one with the largest entropy.




 




  • The geometric distribution of the number Y of failures before the first success is infinitely divisible, i.e., for any positive integer n, there exist independent identically distributed random variables Y1, ..., Yn whose sum has the same distribution that Y has. These will not be geometrically distributed unless n = 1; they follow a negative binomial distribution.




 




  • The decimal digits of the geometrically distributed random variable Y are a sequence of independent (and not identically distributed) random variables. For example, the hundreds digit D has this probability distribution:




 


\Pr(D=d) = {q^{100d} \over {1 + q^{100} + q^{200} + \cdots + q^{900}}},
where q = 1 − p, and similarly for the other digits, and, more generally, similarly for numeral systems with other bases than 10. When the base is 2, this shows that a geometrically distributed random variable can be written as a sum of independent random variables whose probability distributions are indecomposable.

 



 


Related distributions


 



 


Z = \sum_{m=1}^r Y_m
follows a negative binomial distribution with parameters r and p.

 




  • If Y1,...,Yr are independent geometrically distributed variables (with possibly different success parameters p(m)), then their minimum




 


W = \min_{m} Y_m\,
is also geometrically distributed, with parameter p given by









































1 - (1 - p(m)).
  m  




 




  • Suppose 0 < r < 1, and for k = 1, 2, 3, ... the random variable Xk has a Poisson distribution with expected value rk/k. Then




 


\sum_{k=1}^\infty k\,X_k
has a geometric distribution taking values in the set {0, 1, 2, ...}, with expected value r/(1 − r).

SAIYANS ARE OF TRUE WARRIOR RACE . DONT UNDER-ESTIMATE US!
special theory of relativity ....i luv it...
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
mukundmadhav (460)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 74  [119 rates]

mukundmadhav's Avatar

total posts: 432