| Author |
Message |
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 4 Apr 2008 11:33:37 IST
|
|
|
prove that- log710>log1113
|
<TABLE CELLSPACING="1" CELLPADDING="1" BORDER="0">
<TR><TD>
   
<DIV ALIGN="right">Glitter Graphics</DIV></TD></TR></TABLE>
|
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 4 Apr 2008 11:40:12 IST
|
|
|
comeon guys, reply fast...........
|
<TABLE CELLSPACING="1" CELLPADDING="1" BORDER="0">
<TR><TD>
   
<DIV ALIGN="right">Glitter Graphics</DIV></TD></TR></TABLE>
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 4 Apr 2008 11:45:31 IST
Accepted Answer [?]
|
|
|
log710 is same as log10/log7=1/log7.Here,log7 is less than 1. log1113 is same as log13/log11.Here,log11 is greater than 1 and so log13/log11 will be approximately near 1.1-1.3 whereas 1/log7 will be greater coz log7 itself is less than 1.
|
MaNuTd RoXxXx..MaNuTd 2 WiN PrEmIeR LeAgUe ThIs SeAsOn ToO AlOnG WiTh ChAmPiOnS LeAgUe.....HaiL RoNaLdO ...HaiL LaMpArD... |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 4 Apr 2008 11:51:20 IST
|
|
|
how can you affirm that approximation?
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 4 Apr 2008 11:53:51 IST
|
|
|
thanks, i got it..........
|
<TABLE CELLSPACING="1" CELLPADDING="1" BORDER="0">
<TR><TD>
   
<DIV ALIGN="right">Glitter Graphics</DIV></TD></TR></TABLE>
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 4 Apr 2008 11:55:02 IST
|
|
|
C'mon yaar,how much will be the difference between log 13 and log11??.It will be very less since 90 such numbers(log11,log12,..log99) lie between 1 and 2.So,obviously,there isnt going to be much difference between them.
|
MaNuTd RoXxXx..MaNuTd 2 WiN PrEmIeR LeAgUe ThIs SeAsOn ToO AlOnG WiTh ChAmPiOnS LeAgUe.....HaiL RoNaLdO ...HaiL LaMpArD... |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 4 Apr 2008 11:59:04 IST
|
|
|
but you need to prove it with calculations no? things may look obvious but calculations are a must
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 4 Apr 2008 12:52:49 IST
|
|
|
There is no obvious business. we r supposed to prove it . saying that it is obvious is not a proof.
suppose I want to prove that u r wrong , can i just say that u r obviously wrong?
|
this reply: 2 points
(with 0 
in 1 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 4 Apr 2008 13:34:03 IST
|
|
|
Since 
Hence we have 
So, 
or
|
this reply: 35 points
(with 7 
in 7 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
|
|