Home » Ask & Discuss » Mathematics. » Algebra « Back to Discussion



Algebra

Hari Shankar's Avatar
Forum Expert
Joined: 28 Feb 2007
Post: 2173
3 Mar 2008 08:18:47 IST
0 People liked this
21
1144 View Post
Min Value
None

Given that x1x2x3....xn = an
 
find the minimum value of (x1+k) (x2+k)...(xn+k).
 
xi are all +ve and k also is +ve
 
 


Share this article on:

Comments (21)

  • 1
  • 2
  • GO
  • Go to Page...
Decoder's Avatar

Blazing goIITian

Joined: 1 Apr 2007
Posts: 1084
3 Mar 2008 12:39:54 IST
0 people liked this

it means..by a.m g.m inequaility...minimum value of x1+x2...xn..is nothing but [ na ]....just add k n times to it...and take product the way question is asking...u get maximum value as {(na + nk)/n}^n...
or simply (a+k)^n...

i think question woulkd have been abt maximum..because minimum we just can express...and not simplify...
because for maximum of products..we have to use h.m-g.m and calculating the sum of 1/ (x1 +k) ..and so on ..is not possible..(generally)..
Hari Shankar's Avatar

Forum Expert
Joined: 28 Feb 2007
Posts: 2173
3 Mar 2008 12:45:37 IST
0 people liked this

@Decoder: Was that supposed to be a vedic chant or something. Lots of mumbling which didnt make any sense
 
Incidentally, I know the solution. You cant impress me by dropping terms like AM-GM inequality and so on. So, show me some solid working fella.
 
Also, if you happen to know the upper bound for this expression, pls go ahead, bcos that is the next qn I have in mind.
 
 
Decoder's Avatar

Blazing goIITian

Joined: 1 Apr 2007
Posts: 1084
3 Mar 2008 12:52:59 IST
0 people liked this

work..look i m not good at expressing..so u can't say it as mumbling..ok!!! ..i treat everybody as equal..and i thought tht asker must have understood wat i m saying...

working i will show u now..it does take my time..

surely adding abt them they r to be positive...
Sairam's Avatar

Blazing goIITian

Joined: 14 Sep 2007
Posts: 573
3 Mar 2008 12:55:09 IST
0 people liked this

Hi Sir
wat abt k
negative/non negative

Blazing goIITian

Joined: 7 Aug 2007
Posts: 533
3 Mar 2008 12:56:45 IST
0 people liked this

by cauchy swarchz inequlity we have
(x1+k)(x2+k)................(xn+k)>=(x1x2x3...xn + k^n)= (a^n+k^n)
so the min value is (a^n+k^n)

Blazing goIITian

Joined: 7 Aug 2007
Posts: 533
3 Mar 2008 12:59:06 IST
0 people liked this

by cauchy swarchz inequlity we have
(x1+k)(x2+k)................(xn+k)>=(x1x2x3...xn + k^n)= (a^n+k^n)
so the min value is (a^n+k^n)
Sairam's Avatar

Blazing goIITian

Joined: 14 Sep 2007
Posts: 573
3 Mar 2008 13:24:38 IST
0 people liked this

Under the condition
k+xi>0 and<1
i can give d ans using weistress inequality
for dis some restr. on a val. must b gvn.??
Hari Shankar's Avatar

Forum Expert
Joined: 28 Feb 2007
Posts: 2173
3 Mar 2008 13:27:25 IST
0 people liked this

sorry elasti, i forgot to add they r all +ve.
 
@rajat: Cauchy-Schwarz is wrongly applied.
anchit saini's Avatar

Blazing goIITian

Joined: 1 Feb 2008
Posts: 1251
3 Mar 2008 13:32:05 IST
0 people liked this

Min Value
Decoder's Avatar

Blazing goIITian

Joined: 1 Apr 2007
Posts: 1084
3 Mar 2008 13:33:03 IST
0 people liked this

amazingly it is (a+k)^n..
contradicting everything i said above..
anchit saini's Avatar

Blazing goIITian

Joined: 1 Feb 2008
Posts: 1251
3 Mar 2008 13:46:31 IST
0 people liked this

(x1+x2+....xn)/n>=(x1...xn)^1/n=a

also
(x1+k+x2+k+....xn+k)/n=(x1+x2+...xn)/n + k >=[(x1+k)(x2+k)....(xn+k)]^1/n
hence

(x1+x2+...xn)/n  >=[(x1+k)(x2+k)....(xn+k)]^1/n - k         ------1
also
(x1+x2+...xn)/n  >=a                                                   -------2

now i don't know what i am doing, ie i don't know what i have proved through the above.
help req!
Hari Shankar's Avatar

Forum Expert
Joined: 28 Feb 2007
Posts: 2173
3 Mar 2008 13:50:42 IST
0 people liked this

Ok someone tell me why it should not be 2n(ak)n using AM-GM on each individual product.
 
 

Blazing goIITian

Joined: 7 Aug 2007
Posts: 533
4 Mar 2008 12:22:14 IST
0 people liked this

what about the answer i gave , is it correct??

Blazing goIITian

Joined: 7 Aug 2007
Posts: 533
4 Mar 2008 12:24:21 IST
0 people liked this

oh I am sorry , yes the answer is comming to be (a+k)^n, yes i wrongly applied the cauchy swarchz
Conjurer's Avatar

Blazing goIITian

Joined: 20 Feb 2008
Posts: 629
4 Mar 2008 14:25:28 IST
0 people liked this

hsbhatt is right I guess.But this implies all the xi are k this implies xi = a.
Hari Shankar's Avatar

Forum Expert
Joined: 28 Feb 2007
Posts: 2173
4 Mar 2008 18:52:20 IST
0 people liked this

That is why it is wrong. When you use AM-GM on each product, the minimum occurs when x1 = k; x2 = k, ..;xn=k. But if all xi are equal, they are equal to ak.
 
That is why the minimum is not 2(ka)n although it is true that
(x1+k) (x2+k)...(xn+k) >  2(ka)n
 
The answer you are all getting that the minimum is (a+k)n is the right one. But, I would like to see the justification.
vineetnegi's Avatar

Hot goIITian

Joined: 26 Feb 2008
Posts: 117
5 Mar 2008 18:38:39 IST
1 people liked this

yes it is (a+k)^n
applying vieta coefficient theorem and then using AM-GM on the individual term
it reduces to (a+k)^n
Hari Shankar's Avatar

Forum Expert
Joined: 28 Feb 2007
Posts: 2173
5 Mar 2008 19:23:15 IST
0 people liked this

finally!
 
What vineet is saying is that you can expand the product
 (x1+k)(x2+k)...(xn+k) = kn+kn-1(x1+x2+...+xn)+kn-2(x1x2+x2x3+..+xn-1xn)+...+x1x2x3...xn
 
Now, AM-GM can be used on each of the summands. It might seem like a tedious affair, but we can cut it short by noticing that the minimum condition occurs when x1=x2=...=xn=a
 
Hence the minimum is (a+k)n attained when x1=x2=...=xn=a
 
Now, can you find an upper bound for this product?
Conjurer's Avatar

Blazing goIITian

Joined: 20 Feb 2008
Posts: 629
5 Mar 2008 20:38:13 IST
0 people liked this

But we could have used use AM GM as hsbhatt used earlier.Why is it wrong.as you are using xi=a here too.



Quick Reply


Reply

Some HTML allowed.
Keep your comments above the belt or risk having them deleted.
Signup for a avatar to have your pictures show up by your comment
If Members see a thread that violates the Posting Rules, bring it to the attention of the Moderator Team
Free Sign Up!

Preparing for IIT-JEE ?

Arihant Revision Package for IIT JEE - Books, Practice Tests + Rank Predictor


@ INR 1,995/-

For Quick Info

Name

Mobile No.

Find Posts by Topics

Physics.

Topics

Mathematics.

Chemistry.

Biology

Parents

Board

Fun Zone

Sponsored Ads