| Author |
Message |
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 13 Feb 2007 12:20:21 IST
|
|
|
find the sum of all the digits of a natural number n such that on removing the extreme left digit of 'n', the number n/57 is also a natural number
|
Manasi....
NIT-Allahabad...
............................................................
Challenges are High, Dreams r New..
The World out thr is waiting for U !!
Dare to dream, Dare to Try..
No Goal is distant, no Star is too high !!! |
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 13 Feb 2007 19:27:56 IST
|
|
|
157,114 etc.
take any multiple of 57, "add" any digit to its leftmost place
|
Imagination is more important than knowledge
-------Albert Einsetein |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 13 Feb 2007 20:46:38 IST
|
|
|
read your question once again,it is not making sense ''on removing the extreme left digit of 'n', the number n/57 is also a natural number '' when you remove first digit of n , the resultant won't be n only so what do you mean by n/57 is a natural no. and what has it got to do with removing first digit?
|
you have to run faster and faster so as to remain where you are.. even if you are on the right track you will get run over if you just keep sitting there...
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 13 Feb 2007 20:54:23 IST
|
|
|
hey.manasi idon't understand ques. plz make it clear to me
|
there is REASON behind every reason
JO HOTA HAI ACCHE KE LIYE HOTA HAI
GOIN BAD IS NOT GOOD BUT HAVIN BAD IS GOOD ALWAYZ AT THE END........................................................ |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 13 Feb 2007 22:00:29 IST
|
|
|
wat i mean to say is, suppose n is 234578, then on removing 2, 34578 shud be divisible by 57 note: the question was a bit wrong , hav corrected it, srry guys
|
Manasi....
NIT-Allahabad...
............................................................
Challenges are High, Dreams r New..
The World out thr is waiting for U !!
Dare to dream, Dare to Try..
No Goal is distant, no Star is too high !!! |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Take a special case. Consider numbers 157 257 357 457 557 ....957. Removing left digits of this number will give me a number which is divisible by 57. But for all these numbers sum of digits is different. So what exactly are you looking for in the answer
|
Krishna Gopal Singh
B.Tech Chemical Engg
IIT Delhi 2002
Currently doing PhD from IIT Delhi |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 19 Feb 2007 11:00:34 IST
|
|
|
the question given was this much only, nothin else.... it was in some coaching entrance test.... may be they would be asking some general form !!!!
|
Manasi....
NIT-Allahabad...
............................................................
Challenges are High, Dreams r New..
The World out thr is waiting for U !!
Dare to dream, Dare to Try..
No Goal is distant, no Star is too high !!! |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 24 Feb 2007 22:42:29 IST
|
|
|
the number is 7125 and sum is 15
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 25 Feb 2007 12:55:56 IST
|
|
|
let the no. obtained by ommiting the digit be x then 57x=(let)abcdef????. (i) X=bcdef??????.. (ii) Subtracting (ii) from (i) 56x=a000000000000000??..(noif digits in no) X=a0000000000000/56 For x to be an integer a=7and no of digits greter than 4 x=7 x125000???. 57x=399x125000???????.. smallest such no is=49875 Depends on no of digits Hope this is correct
|
nobody is wrong
even a stopped clock is right twice a day |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 25 Feb 2007 12:58:25 IST
|
|
|
c'mon what do you say 
|
nobody is wrong
even a stopped clock is right twice a day |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 25 Feb 2007 13:29:02 IST
|
|
|
hey i hav already posted the smallest number it is ..7125
see remove 7 u get 125 which is nothing but 7125/57
rite...!!!
|
this reply: 5 points
(with 1 
in 1 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 25 Feb 2007 15:22:19 IST
|
|
|
Let the leftmost no. be a and its palce value to be a*10b .
After removing the leftmost digit the remaining no. is divisible by 57 hence n must be odd.
As per the question : a*10b + (n/57) = n
=> 57*a*10b = 56n
=> (19).(3a).(5b).(2b-3.23) = (7).(23).n
=> (19).(3a).(5b).(2b-3) = 7n
Since n is odd then RHS will also be odd. Hence LHS must be odd implies power of 2 should be zero.
Hence b-3 = 0 => b = 3
Putting this above we get (19).(3a).(125) = 7n
=> 7125a = 7n
Since 7125 is not divisible by 7 and RHS has 7 as a factor then a must be 7.
Hence n comes out to be 7125.
Sum of digits = 15
Hope its clear now.
Best Wishes
|
Bipin Kumar Dubey
Chemical Dept.
IIT Kharagpur
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 25 Feb 2007 15:45:40 IST
|
|
|
oh ! I wrongly understood the question !!! yes , your answer is correct !!!!!
|
Umang |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
|
|