physics chemistry maths science forums
become expert I help I sign up I login
refer a friend - earn nickels!!   
 advanced
 
Home
Ask & Discuss Questions
Study Material
Experts Zone
Hang Out!

Ask & Discuss Questions with Community & Experts

Moderation Team
 90 chars left    advanced
Ask iit jee aieee pet cbse icse state board community Community Discussion Question: One more polynomial problem
Forum Index -> Algebra like the article? email it to a friend.  
Author Message
hsbhatt (3151)

Forum Expert Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 597  [680 rates]

hsbhatt's Avatar

total posts: 950    
offline Offline
Konichiwa stay away from this one! (thats a clue)
 
p(x) is a polynomial with integer coefficients. For some positive integer c, none of p(1), p(2), ... , p(c) are divisible by c. Prove that p(b) is not zero for any integer b.
    
feynmann (1954)

Forum Expert Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 354  [446 rates]

feynmann's Avatar

total posts: 718    
offline Offline
If possible let p( b ) = 0 for an integer b . 
case - I ( b< 1 ) 
 
  Now , by division algorithm , we may write
 
         p ( x ) = ( x - b ) Q ( x ) ( Q ( x ) being a polynomial with integer coeff s ) ..............( 1 )
 
  Now we have p ( 1 ) = ( 1 - b ) Q ( 1 )
 
                      p ( 2 ) = ( 2 - b ) Q ( 2 )
 
                  ...............................................
 
 
                       p( c ) = ( c- b ) Q ( c )
 
Now see that all Q ( i ) s are integer ............ ( 2 )
 
  & among ( 1 - b ) , ( 2- b ) ,  ............ ( c- b ) { They are c consecutive integers  & all 0 or -ve ) at least one must be divisible by c ............ ( 3 )
 
  So from  ( 2 ) & ( 3 ) it follows that at least one of p( 1 ) , p( 2 ) ,............p( c )
 
must be divisible by c .
 
 But according to the given condition this is simply wrong .
 
 So our hypothesis is wrong ( Reductio ad absurdum !!!!!!! )
 
So p( b ) is not zero for any  negative integer b . ( Proved.........1  )
case - II
 
If b >c we take the factor to be ( b - x ) & all of ( b- 1 ) ( b- 2 ) ,,  ..... ( b-c ) are positve and consecutive integers so atleast one must be divisible by c .
So our hypothesis is wrong .
so p( b ) is not 0 for any b>c. ( proved ........ 2 )
 
case - III
 Now we have to prove for 1 < b <c
 
we see that for this case there is a b < c for which p( b ) = 0 , so p( b ) is divisible by c which is again against the given condition .
again our hypothesis is wrong .
so p( b ) is non zero for 1 < b < c ( proved ......... 3 )
 
So we havecompleted the proof for all possible cases.
 this reply: 17 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 4 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
elastiboysai (2327)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 421  [532 rates]

elastiboysai's Avatar

total posts: 573    
offline Offline
post edited
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
hsbhatt (3151)

Forum Expert Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 597  [680 rates]

hsbhatt's Avatar

total posts: 950    
offline Offline
We again use the result that P(a) - P(b) is div by (a-b)

Now, if an integer N is div by c then N = kc

We must have (kc-c)| P(kc) - P(c) So if P(N) = 0, then P(c) is div by c which is a contradiction.

Now, suppose N is not a multiple of c. Then N = cd+r where o<r<c

Then N-r|P(N) - P(r) or cd|P(N)-P(r). So, if P(N) = 0, P(r) is divisible by c which is a contradiction as P(k) is not divisible by c for k<=c.
Hence P(x) = 0 has no solution in integers
 this reply: 10 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 2 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
 
Forum Index -> Algebra
Go to:   

Top Offers for goIITians
Correspondence Courses
Brilliant Tutorials
Narayana Institute
Aakash Institute
Classroom/Crash Courses
Narayana - Kota , Delhi , Others
Brilliant Tutorials - Class , Crash
Aakash Institute - Medical , Engg
Online Test Series
Brilliant Tutorials
Narayana Institute
Aakash Institute
Mahesh Tutorials
AMITY      Sri Chaitanya