Home » Ask & Discuss » Mathematics. » Algebra « Back to Discussion



Algebra

Hari Shankar's Avatar
Forum Expert
Joined: 28 Feb 2007
Post: 2173
25 Jan 2008 09:03:07 IST
0 People liked this
3
482 View Post
One more polynomial problem
None

Konichiwa stay away from this one! (thats a clue)
 
p(x) is a polynomial with integer coefficients. For some positive integer c, none of p(1), p(2), ... , p(c) are divisible by c. Prove that p(b) is not zero for any integer b.


Share this article on:

Comments (3)

abhishek sinha's Avatar

Forum Expert
Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 926
25 Jan 2008 21:56:30 IST
4 people liked this

If possible let p( b ) = 0 for an integer b . 
case - I ( b< 1 ) 
 
  Now , by division algorithm , we may write
 
         p ( x ) = ( x - b ) Q ( x ) ( Q ( x ) being a polynomial with integer coeff s ) ..............( 1 )
 
  Now we have p ( 1 ) = ( 1 - b ) Q ( 1 )
 
                      p ( 2 ) = ( 2 - b ) Q ( 2 )
 
                  ...............................................
 
 
                       p( c ) = ( c- b ) Q ( c )
 
Now see that all Q ( i ) s are integer ............ ( 2 )
 
  & among ( 1 - b ) , ( 2- b ) ,  ............ ( c- b ) { They are c consecutive integers  & all 0 or -ve ) at least one must be divisible by c ............ ( 3 )
 
  So from  ( 2 ) & ( 3 ) it follows that at least one of p( 1 ) , p( 2 ) ,............p( c )
 
must be divisible by c .
 
 But according to the given condition this is simply wrong .
 
 So our hypothesis is wrong ( Reductio ad absurdum !!!!!!! )
 
So p( b ) is not zero for any  negative integer b . ( Proved.........1  )
case - II
 
If b >c we take the factor to be ( b - x ) & all of ( b- 1 ) ( b- 2 ) ,,  ..... ( b-c ) are positve and consecutive integers so atleast one must be divisible by c .
So our hypothesis is wrong .
so p( b ) is not 0 for any b>c. ( proved ........ 2 )
 
case - III
 Now we have to prove for 1 < b <c
 
we see that for this case there is a b < c for which p( b ) = 0 , so p( b ) is divisible by c which is again against the given condition .
again our hypothesis is wrong .
so p( b ) is non zero for 1 < b < c ( proved ......... 3 )
 
So we havecompleted the proof for all possible cases.
Sairam's Avatar

Blazing goIITian

Joined: 14 Sep 2007
Posts: 573
25 Jan 2008 23:04:23 IST
0 people liked this

post edited
Hari Shankar's Avatar

Forum Expert
Joined: 28 Feb 2007
Posts: 2173
26 Jan 2008 09:26:03 IST
2 people liked this

We again use the result that P(a) - P(b) is div by (a-b)

Now, if an integer N is div by c then N = kc

We must have (kc-c)| P(kc) - P(c) So if P(N) = 0, then P(c) is div by c which is a contradiction.

Now, suppose N is not a multiple of c. Then N = cd+r where o<r<c

Then N-r|P(N) - P(r) or cd|P(N)-P(r). So, if P(N) = 0, P(r) is divisible by c which is a contradiction as P(k) is not divisible by c for k<=c.
Hence P(x) = 0 has no solution in integers



Quick Reply


Reply

Some HTML allowed.
Keep your comments above the belt or risk having them deleted.
Signup for a avatar to have your pictures show up by your comment
If Members see a thread that violates the Posting Rules, bring it to the attention of the Moderator Team
Free Sign Up!

Preparing for IIT-JEE ?

Arihant Revision Package for IIT JEE - Books, Practice Tests + Rank Predictor


@ INR 1,995/-

For Quick Info

Name

Mobile No.

Find Posts by Topics

Physics.

Topics

Mathematics.

Chemistry.

Biology

Parents

Board

Fun Zone

Sponsored Ads