| Author |
Message |
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 13 Mar 2008 01:33:11 IST
|
|
|
q. find the sum of all divisors of 9900. soln. given at back is like dis:- 9900 = 3^2 . 2^2.5^2.11 therfore sum = (3^0+3^1+3^2)(2^0+..+2^2)(..and similarily other two) now everything had gone above my head...plzzz help..i mean why they hv done like dis...what is the basic idea...there must be sum idea ....and why this expression will evaluate answer??plzz help expertse.g.nadeemoidu,hsbhatta sir?
|
My destiny , not dream
<TABLE CELLSPACING="1" CELLPADDING="1" BORDER="0">
<TR><TD>
       
<DIV ALIGN="right">Animated Letters</DIV></TD></TR></TABLE>
|
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 13 Mar 2008 01:48:41 IST
|
|
|
please help me...i m in dire need...plzzzzz..
|
My destiny , not dream
<TABLE CELLSPACING="1" CELLPADDING="1" BORDER="0">
<TR><TD>
       
<DIV ALIGN="right">Animated Letters</DIV></TD></TR></TABLE>
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 13 Mar 2008 09:08:03 IST
|
|
|
i had learnt of this proof somewhere(most probably over the internet)--
lets start with proof for sum of divisors of pk where p is a prime number
sum of its divisors should be (pk+1)/ (p-1)
proof-- divisors of pk = 1,p,p2, ......pk hence sum of divisors is a GP =(pk+1-1) / (p-1)
now if a number can be represented as
n = p1r1 . ...... pkrk
hence sum of its divisors would be -- ( p1r1+1 - 1)/ (p1-1) ... ......( pkrk+1 - 1) / (pk-1)
|
Impossible To be Impossible is Impossible |
this reply: 10 points
(with 2 
in 2 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 13 Mar 2008 09:13:11 IST
|
|
|
according to the above proof--
as 9900 = 32.22.52.11
so sum of divisors should be--

=33852
|
Impossible To be Impossible is Impossible |
this reply: 22 points
(with 4 
in 5 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 14 Mar 2008 01:45:53 IST
|
|
|
i don't understand why ppl post their views...i just asked u to explain the answer which i have already posted..but u guys are posting ur answers...............and only 1 reply....what happened to all others ???koni,hsbhatt,nadeem and many champs here???
|
My destiny , not dream
<TABLE CELLSPACING="1" CELLPADDING="1" BORDER="0">
<TR><TD>
       
<DIV ALIGN="right">Animated Letters</DIV></TD></TR></TABLE>
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 14 Mar 2008 07:10:54 IST
|
|
|
Madam, your champs were fast asleep while you were in distress. Please accept my apologies. See, any number N can be uniquely factorised into its prime factors as N = x1p x2q x3r .... Any factor of N can now be constituted as x 1p1 x 2q1 x 3r1 .... where p 1 p, q 1 q, r 1 r Another way is to say, that every factor of N is a term in the following expression: (1+x1+x12+...+x1p) (1+x2+x22+...+x2q) (1+x3+x32+...+x3r).... Since every factor of N gets listed out, this expression is also the sum of all the factors of N, which is what is shown in your text book. This can be simplified easily using GP summation formula as
|
this reply: 10 points
(with 2 
in 2 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 14 Mar 2008 08:23:41 IST
|
|
|
what i posted above is not my own view by the way what is the answer to the qn casio_ss??
|
Impossible To be Impossible is Impossible |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 14 Mar 2008 09:30:42 IST
|
|
|
i think it is 33,852
|
Nitwit Blubber Odment Tweak
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The question is to explain the expression ( 30 + 31 + 32 ) ( 20 + 21 + 22 ) ( 50 + 51 + 52 ) ( 110 +111) i.e. how do we get it , not how to simplify it.
Now, Let us consider a smaller example .
12 = 22.3
Look at the factors of 12 i.e. 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 6, 12 or equivalently 1 , 2 , 3 , 22 , 2.3 , 22.3 Note that if we expand the expression ( 1+ 2 + 22) ( 1 + 3 ) , all these terms are included.
The logic is that we can choose the no. of powers of each prime factor . So if all these powers are included , then we get all the factors. that is what we r doing.
|
this reply: 5 points
(with 1 
in 1 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
|
|