| Author |
Message |
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 24 Mar 2008 21:31:14 IST
|
|
|
f(x) is a cubic polynomial x3+ax2+bx+c such that f(x)=0 has 3 distinct integral roots and f(g(x))=0 does not have real roots where g(x)=x2+2x-5,then minimum value of a+b+c is=? The solution given is as follows- Let roots be p,q,r such that p<q<r.Since g(x) can take values from [-6,inf.],p<= -7, q<= -8 and r<= -9. I didnt understand how they got this from the info that g(x) can take the specified values. Can anyone plz explain??You can also post any other method to solve the sum.
|
MaNuTd RoXxXx..MaNuTd 2 WiN PrEmIeR LeAgUe ThIs SeAsOn ToO AlOnG WiTh ChAmPiOnS LeAgUe.....HaiL RoNaLdO ...HaiL LaMpArD... |
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 24 Mar 2008 21:34:01 IST
|
|
|
pl correct ur f(x) and g(x) u missed out the x^2..u have typed as x i think
|
Nitwit Blubber Odment Tweak
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 24 Mar 2008 21:40:30 IST
|
|
|
Oh yes...corrected it now.
|
MaNuTd RoXxXx..MaNuTd 2 WiN PrEmIeR LeAgUe ThIs SeAsOn ToO AlOnG WiTh ChAmPiOnS LeAgUe.....HaiL RoNaLdO ...HaiL LaMpArD... |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 24 Mar 2008 21:45:15 IST
|
|
|
x^2+2x-5=g(x) minima=> 2x+2=0 or x=-1 so M=1-2-5=-6 it is unbounded for maxima
so -6<=g(x)< infinity
now putting f(g(x))=f(-6) for minima
=-216+36a-6b+c since it has no real roots, it lies totally above y-axis for all g(x)
|
" Always remember money isn't everything but make sure you have made a lot of it before talking such nonsense!"
- Bill Gates |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 24 Mar 2008 21:48:36 IST
|
|
|
Akhil,i know that g(x)>=-6 but how p,q and r are predicted from that??
|
MaNuTd RoXxXx..MaNuTd 2 WiN PrEmIeR LeAgUe ThIs SeAsOn ToO AlOnG WiTh ChAmPiOnS LeAgUe.....HaiL RoNaLdO ...HaiL LaMpArD... |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 24 Mar 2008 21:50:43 IST
|
|
|
is the answer -1?
since g(x) also takes 1 in the range
f(1)=a+b+c+1 but f(1)>0 so a+b+c+1>0, a+b+c>-1
|
" Always remember money isn't everything but make sure you have made a lot of it before talking such nonsense!"
- Bill Gates |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 24 Mar 2008 21:56:11 IST
|
|
|
The value of a+b+c is asked.If you want the solution,i will post it but i want to know how p,q and r are got because the remaining solution relies on it.
|
MaNuTd RoXxXx..MaNuTd 2 WiN PrEmIeR LeAgUe ThIs SeAsOn ToO AlOnG WiTh ChAmPiOnS LeAgUe.....HaiL RoNaLdO ...HaiL LaMpArD... |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 24 Mar 2008 22:14:09 IST
|
|
|
Someone please try it!!!
|
MaNuTd RoXxXx..MaNuTd 2 WiN PrEmIeR LeAgUe ThIs SeAsOn ToO AlOnG WiTh ChAmPiOnS LeAgUe.....HaiL RoNaLdO ...HaiL LaMpArD... |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 24 Mar 2008 22:40:25 IST
|
|
|
C'mon,what happened to all the math scholars???
|
MaNuTd RoXxXx..MaNuTd 2 WiN PrEmIeR LeAgUe ThIs SeAsOn ToO AlOnG WiTh ChAmPiOnS LeAgUe.....HaiL RoNaLdO ...HaiL LaMpArD... |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 24 Mar 2008 22:42:48 IST
|
|
|
Lampard g(x) will have zeroes if it is >-6 see i can factorizef(g(x)) as [g(x)-p][g(x)-q][g(x)-r] if p,q,r are less than -6 then g(x) cant have real roots but gvn f(x) has 3 dist. integral roots,.. so the gvn assumptions rt
edited
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 24 Mar 2008 22:45:48 IST
|
|
|
k isee it now f(x) has to have 3 distinct integral roots makes sense. so p<=7,q<=8,r<=9 and also p<q<r
the fact that f(x) has integral roots need not imply g(x) has real roots this was what was preluding me
|
this reply: 5 points
(with 1 
in 1 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 24 Mar 2008 22:52:40 IST
|
|
|
Oh yes...i have got it now...thanx elastiboy...
|
MaNuTd RoXxXx..MaNuTd 2 WiN PrEmIeR LeAgUe ThIs SeAsOn ToO AlOnG WiTh ChAmPiOnS LeAgUe.....HaiL RoNaLdO ...HaiL LaMpArD... |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
|
|