| Author |
Message |
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 8 Dec 2007 11:04:47 IST
|
|
|
consider an equation: 2x2 +mx +m2 - 5 =0
(1)the set of values of m for which both the roots of the equation are less than 1 is:
(2)the set of values of m for which both the roots exceed -1 is:
|
    
Animated Letters
 |
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 8 Dec 2007 11:08:23 IST
|
|
|
plz give all the steps(rates gauranteed)
|
    
Animated Letters
 |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 8 Dec 2007 11:12:30 IST
|
|
|
Is the ans to (1) (-4,-2)
and(2) (4,infinty)
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 8 Dec 2007 12:42:59 IST
|
|
|
@yash your ans is not correct.
|
    
Animated Letters
 |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 8 Dec 2007 14:54:16 IST
|
|
|
plz check dese, if correct i will give solutions also
(1) ( - , (-1- 13)/2 ) ( (-1+ 13)/2, )
(2) ( (1- 29)/2 , (1+ 29)/2 )
and plz give ratings if useful...
|
BoRn 2 WiN
       
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 8 Dec 2007 15:02:02 IST
|
|
|
for real roots first of all D> or equal to 0 =>m [- (40/7),+ (40/7)]
1.for both roots of eqn. to be less than 1, f(1)>0 and 1>-b/2a =>1>-m/4 =>m>- 4 f(1)>0=>m2+m-3>0 =>m doesn't belong to (-1- 13/2,-1+ 13/2) => m (- (40/7),-1- 13/2) (-1+ 13/2, (40/7)) 2.here f(-1)>0 and -1< -b/2a =>-1<-m/4 =>m<4 f(-1)>0 =>m2-m-3>0 => m (1- 13/2,1+ 13/2) combining all these,m (- (40/7),1- 13/2) (1+ 13/2, (40/7))
rate me iff satisfied......
|
"Nenenthedhavano naake teleedu"
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 8 Dec 2007 15:06:29 IST
|
|
|
oh yes i forgot to take dat 40/ 7 range well other one is ok
harsha plz check ur other solution
|
BoRn 2 WiN
       
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 8 Dec 2007 16:35:12 IST
|
|
|
wht if i tell u that both roots are less than 2,will u take f(2)> 0 and 2 <-b/2a ?? or is it valid only in this case????
|
    
Animated Letters
 |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 8 Dec 2007 20:11:04 IST
|
|
|
yes .....of course , if u have written that roots are less than 2 then i would have taken that f(2)>0 and 2>-b/2a to solve the eqn. actually it doesn't depend on whether it is 2 or 1 it is true for any value given in that place...... here the coefficient of x2 is 2(means +ve) ....that means parabola opens upwards ......and in the qn. we want both roots < 1 (or any constant k)means 1 lies before both the roots on x-axis and let the roots be p and q (let p<q) ......f(x)>0 for x<p and <0 for p<x<q and >0 for x>q ,as we want both roots to be less than 1 =>1>q(>p) means f(1)>0 .....but if u consider only this condition ,it means u r considering only that at 1 ,fn. has a +ve value .....but this can happen in the interval x<p also which also gives a soln. for 1 less than both the roots also....so for 1 to be greater than both roots only,we'll take one more condition which removes that unwanted part.....that is 1>-b/2a ......now what is -b/2a?.....-b/2a is the point at which the fn. has an extremum (minima in this case as a is +ve) now if 1 is > this value also then obviously the soln. we'll get gives the values for which 1 is only >both roots thus removing the error and giving values what we want......so applying these 2 conditions we can solve the qn........hope u got it ...
|
"Nenenthedhavano naake teleedu"
|
this reply: 4 points
(with 0 
in 2 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 8 Dec 2007 22:03:59 IST
|
|
|
i mean if we consider only f(1)>0 then we will be also considering the region when 1 is less than both the roots also in addition to the region when 1 is greater than both roots.....got it? because that region also satisfies this condition ......so in order that 1 to be greater than both roots we 'll take the condition that 1>-b/2a so that when we superimpose these two results we'll get only the region where 1 is > both the roots
|
"Nenenthedhavano naake teleedu"
|
this reply: 5 points
(with 1 
in 1 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 8 Dec 2007 22:09:05 IST
|
|
|
can someone else try to explain???
|
    
Animated Letters
 |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 8 Dec 2007 22:16:52 IST
|
|
|
you tell me where u have not understood?
atleast rate my efforts yaar
|
"Nenenthedhavano naake teleedu"
|
this reply: 2 points
(with 0 
in 1 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 8 Dec 2007 23:29:58 IST
|
|
|
harsha is right :).. wht didnt u get yaar
|
---------------------------------------------------------------
- Gaurav Ragtah (spideyunlimited)
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 8 Dec 2007 23:51:15 IST
|
|
|