physics chemistry maths science forums
become expert I help I sign up I login
refer a friend - earn nickels!!   
 advanced
 
Home
Ask & Discuss Questions
Study Material
Experts Zone
Hang Out!

Ask & Discuss Questions with Community & Experts

Moderation Team
 90 chars left    advanced
Ask iit jee aieee pet cbse icse state board experts Expert Question: value of m
Forum Index -> Algebra like the article? email it to a friend.  
Author Message
prathima (49)

Hot goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 7  [14 rates]

prathima's Avatar

total posts: 150    
offline Offline
if m&n r natural numbers such that
m/n=1/3+1/5+1/17+1/19+1/23+1/1979+1/1983+1/1985+1/1997+1/1999
will2001 or 2002 divides m?????


GBXDHNXDFNHBHRSDRGWEASGSEDH
    
puneet1622 (38)

Cool goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 6  [10 rates]

puneet1622's Avatar

total posts: 43    
offline Offline
Yaar check ur question pls ... u can always say that 2001 and 2002 will divide m .
If 2001 does not divide m then multiply both m and n by 2001. Now the m/n ratio remains same but m is divisible by 2001.
 
So we are done ...
 
But i think the question demands something else .. check it out .
 
cheers

There is only one .. one best way !!!!!!!!!
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
gorakavipraveen (121)

Hot goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 19  bad job dude!! I dont approve of this answer! 1  [34 rates]

gorakavipraveen's Avatar

total posts: 168    
offline Offline

Praveen kumar gorakavi
Hyderabad.
gorakavipraveen@gmail.com
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
edison (4435)

Forum Expert Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 783  [1043 rates]

edison's Avatar

total posts: 2269    
offline Offline
I agree upon the logic suggested by Puneet1622, please  mention whether m/n is the simplest ratio or any other ratio.

The most incomprehensible thing about the world is that it is

at all comprehensible.
 this reply: 5 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 1 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
polymath (143)

Hot goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 23  [37 rates]

polymath's Avatar

total posts: 148    
offline Offline
m/n= 1/3 + 1/1999 + 1/5 + 1/1997 + 1/17 + 1/1985 + 1/19 + 1/1983 + 1/23 + 1/1979
 
m/n = 1999+3/3*1999 + 1997+5/5*1997 + 1985+17/17*1985 + 1983+19/19*1983 + 1979+23/23*1979
 
taking 2002 common
 
m/n = 2002 (1/3*1999 + 1/5*1997   + 1/17*1985 + 1/ 19*1983  + 1/ 23*1979)
 
let  1/3*1999 + 1/5*1997   + 1/17*1985 + 1/ 19*1983  + 1/ 23*1979 = k
 
m/n = 2002*k
 
m/n is divisible by 2002. This is how we can approach this problem. But k may
 
or may not be an integer  so we cant say surely wether it is divisible by 2002 or
 
not.Since you have given two options i ll assume k is a number. so 2002 is right
 
choice.  
 

They say ITZ NOT THE APTITUDE BUT THE ATTITUDE WHICH DECIDES U R ALTITUDE . THEN WHY M I NOT AT THE TOP IN THIS SITE? LIFE IS JUST NOT FAIR.
 this reply: 7 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 2 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
edison (4435)

Forum Expert Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 783  [1043 rates]

edison's Avatar

total posts: 2269    
offline Offline
Well done polymath keep it up. The way u cracked the problem is fantastic and appreciated

The most incomprehensible thing about the world is that it is

at all comprehensible.
 this reply: 5 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 1 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
gorakavipraveen (121)

Hot goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 19  bad job dude!! I dont approve of this answer! 1  [34 rates]

gorakavipraveen's Avatar

total posts: 168    
offline Offline
hey polymath
whats your opinion on your build up constant k. I did the same but with the same( following) thought I have discharged my idea 2 hours ago.
Confirm me what exactly m/n gives. If it is a fraction, then no mind ,all m and n (I MEAN ALL CONSTANTS ARE DIVISIBLE BY ALL NUMBERS .HERE CONSTANT I MEAN IS IF WE CONSIDER M OR N AS CONSTANTS FOR A PERTICULAR CASE.)can be divided by what not every constant. For the given case its idle to condsider as m/2001 or m/2002 NOT A FRACTION.I THINK THIS IS THE REQUIRED CONDITION FOR A VARIABLE TO BE PERFECTLY DIVIDED BY SOME OTHER. So in accordanse to PUNEET, some data is missed. If your proof is climed correct, iI guess 1 can be dividedby 1,03,89,431 and what not every element on number line.so probably k according to me can not be a fraction as against your proof. I am sorry to say this but I am trying to explore more through this healthy debate.

Praveen kumar gorakavi
Hyderabad.
gorakavipraveen@gmail.com
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
 
Forum Index -> Algebra
Go to:   

Top Offers for goIITians
Correspondence Courses
Brilliant Tutorials
Narayana Institute
Aakash Institute
Classroom/Crash Courses
Narayana - Kota , Delhi , Others
Brilliant Tutorials - Class , Crash
Aakash Institute - Medical , Engg
Online Test Series
Brilliant Tutorials
Narayana Institute
Aakash Institute
Mahesh Tutorials
AMITY      Sri Chaitanya