sign up I login
 advanced
refer a friend - earn nickels!!

Ask & Discuss Questions with Community & Experts

Moderation Team
 90 chars left    advanced
Ask iit jee aieee pet cbse icse state board community Community Discussion Question: Write 271 as the sum of positive real numbers so as to maximize their product
Forum Index -> Algebra like the article? email it to a friend.  
Author Message
little_genius (295)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 53  [68 rates]

little_genius's Avatar

total posts: 352    
offline Offline

Write 271 as the sum of positive real numbers so as to maximize their product


[url=http://www.signaturebar.com/][img]

    
rudra.panda (2514)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 430  [612 rates]

rudra.panda's Avatar

total posts: 2522    
online Online
271=136+135
136*135=18360. Couldn't find any other.

God does not care about our mathematical difficulties. He integrates empirically. ~~~Albert Einstein (1879-1955)~~~~
To divide a cube into two other cubes, a fourth power or in general any power whatever into two powers of the same denomination above the second is impossible, and I have assuredly found an admirable proof of this, but the margin is too narrow to contain it.~~~Pierre de Fermat (1601-1665)~~~

 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
nitigya (262)

Scorching goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 44  [65 rates]

nitigya's Avatar

total posts: 225    
offline Offline

rudra ur ans i swrng as it says real no n not integers !!!!!!!!!


no the answer should be 135.5




 


 




 


as 135.5*135.5 = 18360.25 and that is the max product




 


 




 


rate if satisfied!


It is not easy to see how the more extreme forms of nationalism can long survive when men have seen the Earth in its true perspective as a single small globe against the stars. Arthur C. Clarke


http://removesuperstition.blogspot.com/

 this reply: 4 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 2 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
vasanth (2315)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 401  [556 rates]

vasanth's Avatar

total posts: 517    
offline Offline

hey


u c itz positive real nos......


so d first thing u shud look at is


x + y/2 >= rt(xy)


so itz obviously (135.5)^2........


in maximisin probs the value u luk fer mostly lies in middle


dbznfreak---watchin episodes for 6 yrs--movin on to dbgt

<TABLE CELLSPACING="1" CELLPADDING="1" BORDER="0">
<TR><TD>


<DIV ALIGN="right">Animated Letters</DIV></TD></TR></TABLE>
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
vasanth (2315)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 401  [556 rates]

vasanth's Avatar

total posts: 517    
offline Offline

oops........stupid me!


it s not mentioned 2 + real nos...is it........


let me assume the number of numbers to b 'n'


so


x1 + x2 + ....+ xn   >=  n (x1x2.....xn)1/n


.......pdt....<= (271/n)n


so pdt is a function of number of terms


so p(n) = (271/n)n.........


logp = n log(271) - nlogn


1/p * dp/dn = log271 - logn - 1


dp/dn = p[log (271 / n) - 1]


dp/dn = 0 ------->> log(271/n) = 1 or p=0


n = 271/e or p = 0


but p cant be zero so


n = 271/e


n x1 = nx2 = .......= nxn = 271


so...


x1 = x2 = x3=.......=xn = e


so the positive real numbers required are:


271/e................n times..........


x1 = x2 = x3=.......=xn = e.........


uhhhhhh........now anothr prob.....,m gettin not gettin n as an integer.......ne1 help.....


dbznfreak---watchin episodes for 6 yrs--movin on to dbgt

<TABLE CELLSPACING="1" CELLPADDING="1" BORDER="0">
<TR><TD>


<DIV ALIGN="right">Animated Letters</DIV></TD></TR></TABLE>
 this reply: 10 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 2 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
sachinguptaiit (940)

Scorching goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 166  [221 rates]

sachinguptaiit's Avatar

total posts: 203    
offline Offline

Let the numbers be x and 271-x


P(x) = Product of two numbers


P(x) = x ( 271-x )


P'(x) = 271 - 2x


Since P(x) is max hence P'(x) = 0


x = 135.5


"Before you start some work, always ask yourself three questions - Why am I doing it, What the results might be and Will I be successful. Only when you think deeply and find satisfactory answers to these questions, go ahead."

Chanakya quotes (Indian politician, strategist and writer, 350 BC-275 BC)
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
vasanth (2315)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 401  [556 rates]

vasanth's Avatar

total posts: 517    
offline Offline

@sachin gupta.....


dats d mistake we all made d last tym.........


its not mentioned 2 nos.--got it!


accordin to ma soln.....the max pdt is e271/e ~~~approx....(2.7)100.....which is way higher than ur 135.5^2


 


xperts......reply


dbznfreak---watchin episodes for 6 yrs--movin on to dbgt

<TABLE CELLSPACING="1" CELLPADDING="1" BORDER="0">
<TR><TD>


<DIV ALIGN="right">Animated Letters</DIV></TD></TR></TABLE>
 this reply: 7 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 2 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
rudra.panda (2514)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 430  [612 rates]

rudra.panda's Avatar

total posts: 2522    
online Online
@vasanth i think you are correct. It is no where mentioned that it has to be 2 numbers. It can be more that that.

God does not care about our mathematical difficulties. He integrates empirically. ~~~Albert Einstein (1879-1955)~~~~
To divide a cube into two other cubes, a fourth power or in general any power whatever into two powers of the same denomination above the second is impossible, and I have assuredly found an admirable proof of this, but the margin is too narrow to contain it.~~~Pierre de Fermat (1601-1665)~~~

 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
hsbhatt (4910)

Forum Expert Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 926  [1066 rates]

hsbhatt's Avatar

total posts: 1478    
offline Offline

Call the product for n integers as f(n)


Then f(n) = \left(\frac{271}{n}\right)^n


You will observe that the function initially increases. We must find out, up to what n this happens.


f(n) < f(n+1) \Rightarrow \left(\frac{271}{n} \right )^{n} < \left(\frac{271}{n+1} \right )^{n+1} \\ \\<br/>\text{or} \ \left(1+\frac{1}{n} \right)^n (n+1) < 271


Now, we can use tha fact that the function \left(1+\frac{1}{n}\right)^n approaches e rapidly. So, we can approximate it by 2.7


This gives n = 100 as a good estimate for the largest such n. Thereafter it is a decreasing function.


I checked with Excel (that's the best I have!) and 100 is right


Time wounds all heels
 this reply: 10 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 2 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
mukulaish (238)

Hot goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 38  [62 rates]

mukulaish's Avatar

total posts: 188    
offline Offline
let the numbers b x and 271-x

their product is equal to 271x-x^2
now f(x)=271x-x^2

for the function to be maximum or minimum d/dx{f(x)=0

i.e 271-2x=0
=>x=271/2=135.5

now finding the double derivative of f(x)

it is equal to -2<0
this proves that x=135.5 is a point of maximum....


thus the two numbers are 135.5 and 135.5



further for a competitive point of view all the questions of this kind the answer is always half the number given.....




rate if useful....
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
feynmann (2236)

Forum Expert Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 404  [512 rates]

feynmann's Avatar

total posts: 814    
offline Offline

ans all are 2.71


Proof : Using the old A.M>= G.M


G.M. <= ( 271/n) ^n ( it attains the maximum value when all xi's are equal )


Now consider the characteristics of ( 271/x)^x ( let x be a real no )


Now we have that it attains its maximum value at x= 271/e= 99.6959


we need to consider only n = 99 or, n =100


Trough actual calculation it comes out that for x= 100 it attains the maximum value


Hence all the lenghths should be 2.71

 this reply: 5 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 1 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
hsbhatt (4910)

Forum Expert Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 926  [1066 rates]

hsbhatt's Avatar

total posts: 1478    
offline Offline

@mukulaish: The question has not placed a restriction on the number of real numbers that can be there.


Time wounds all heels
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
 
Forum Index -> Algebra
Go to:   

Top Offers for goIITians
Correspondence Courses
Brilliant Tutorials
Narayana Institute