sign up I login
 advanced
refer a friend - earn nickels!!

Community Contributions - Articles by goIITians

  Back to Community Shelf like the article? email it to a friend. email this article!  
  Do you know how the schrodinger wave equation was derived????   Awaiting Review for Nickels
Tagged with:    [Post New]posted on 14 Jul 2008 21:16:15 IST    


SCHRODINGER WAVE EQUATION DERIVATION:



 



 



                                         



  Schrödinger's equation follows very naturally      earlier developments:



In 1905, by considering the photoelectric effect, Albert Einstein had published his



E = h f\;


formula for the relation between the energy E and frequency f of the quanta of radiation (photons), where h is Planck's constant.



In 1924 Louis de Broglie presented his de Broglie hypothesis which states that all particles (not just photons) have an associated wavefunction \Psi\; with properties:



p=h / \lambda\;, where \lambda\, is the wavelength of the wave and p the momentum of the particle.


De Broglie showed that this was consistent with Einstein's formula and special relativity so that



E = h f\;


still holds, but now this is hypothesized to hold for all particles, not just photons anymore.



Expressed in terms of angular frequency \omega = 2\pi f\; and wavenumber k = 2\pi / \lambda\;, with \hbar = h / 2 \pi\; we get:



E=\hbar \omega


and



\mathbf{p}=\hbar \mathbf{k}\;


where we have expressed p and k as vectors.



Schrödinger's great insight, late in 1925, was to express the phase of a plane wave as a complex phase factor:



\psi \approx e^{i(\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{x}- \omega t)}


and to realize that since



 \frac{\partial}{\partial t} \psi = -i\omega \psi


then



 E \psi = \hbar \omega \psi =  i\hbar\frac{\partial}{\partial t} \psi


and similarly since:



 \frac{\partial}{\partial x} \psi = i k_x \psi


then



 p_x \psi = \hbar k_x \psi = -i\hbar\frac{\partial}{\partial x} \psi


and hence:



 p_x^2 \psi = -\hbar^2\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2} \psi


so that, again for a plane wave, he got:



 p^2 \psi = (p_x^2 + p_y^2 + p_z^2) \psi = -\hbar^2\left(\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2} + \frac{\partial^2}{\partial y^2} + \frac{\partial^2}{\partial z^2}\right) \psi = -\hbar^2\nabla^2 \psi


And by inserting these expressions into the Newtonian formula for a particle with total energy E, mass m, moving in a potential V:



E=\frac{p^2}{2m}+V (simply the sum of the kinetic energy and potential energy; the plane wave model assumed V = 0)


he got his famed equation for a single particle in the 3-dimensional case in the presence of a potential:



i\hbar\frac{\partial}{\partial t}\Psi=-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\nabla^2\Psi + V\Psi


Using this equation, Schrödinger computed the spectral lines for hydrogen by treating a hydrogen atom's single negatively charged electron as a wave, \psi\;, moving in a potential well, V, created by the positively charged proton. This computation tallied with experiment, the Bohr model and also the results of Werner Heisenberg's matrix mechanics - but without having to introduce Heisenberg's concept of non-commuting observables. Schrödinger published his wave equation and the spectral analysis of hydrogen in a series of four papers in 1926.



The Schrödinger equation defines the behaviour of \psi\;, but does not interpret what \psi\; is. Schrödinger tried unsuccessfully to interpret it as a charge density. In 1926 Max Born, just a few days after Schrödinger's fourth and final paper was published, successfully interpreted \psi\; as a probability amplitude, although Schrödinger was never reconciled to this statistical or probabilistic approach.



 



In the mathematical formulation of quantum mechanics, a physical system is associated with a complex Hilbert space such that each instantaneous state of the system is described by a ray in that space. The nonzero elements of a Hilbert space are by definition normalizable and it is convenient, although not necessary, to represent a state by an element of the ray which is normalized to unity. This vector is often somewhat loosely referred to as wave function, although in a more rigorous formulation of quantum mechanics a wave function is a special case of a state vector. (In fact, a wave function is a state in the position representation, see below). A state vector encodes the probabilities for the outcomes of all possible measurements applied to the system. It contains all information of the system that is knowable in a quantum mechanical sense. As the state of a system generally changes over time, the state vector is a function of time. The Schrödinger equation provides a quantitative description of the rate of change of the state vector.



In Dirac's bra-ket notation at time t the state is given by the ket |\psi(t)\rangle. The time-dependent Schrödinger equation, giving the time evolution of the ket, is:



H(t)\left|\psi\left(t\right)\right\rangle = \mathrm{i}\hbar \frac{d}{d t} \left| \psi \left(t\right) \right\rangle


where i is the imaginary unit, t is time, d / dt is the derivative with respect to t, \hbar is the reduced Planck's constant (Planck's constant divided by 2\pi\,), \psi(t)\, is the time dependent state vector, and H(t) is the Hamiltonian (a self-adjoint operator acting on the state space). If one assumes a certain representation for \psi\,, for instance position or momentum representation, the state vector is assumed to depend on more variables than time alone, and the time derivative must be replaced by the partial derivative \partial / \partial t.



The Hamiltonian describes the total energy of the system. As with the force occurring in Newton's second law, its form is not provided by the Schrödinger equation, but must be independently determined from the physical properties of the system.



 



                                   



 


GOOD RATES EXPECTED<\.....


About the Author:
AJ1991 (471)

Scorching goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 83  [111 rates]

AJ1991's Avatar

total posts: 277    
online Offline
 this article: 35 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 7 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
AJ1991
AJ1991 is offline comment by AJ1991    (posted on 14 Jul 2008 21:40:54 IST)
Come on ppl...................................
SAGGITARIUS is offline comment by SAGGITARIUS    (posted on 15 Jul 2008 15:03:48 IST)
thanks aj1991 . i was really finding this
once again thanks
vibhu.oct
vibhu.oct is offline comment by vibhu.oct    (posted on 18 Jul 2008 20:05:02 IST)
Xcellent
Go to:   

Top Offers for goIITians
Correspondence Courses
Brilliant Tutorials
Narayana Institute
Aakash Institute
Classroom/Crash Courses
Narayana - Kota , Delhi , Others
Brilliant Tutorials - Class , Crash
Aakash Institute - Medical , Engg
Online Test Series
Brilliant Tutorials
Narayana Institute
Aakash Institute
Mahesh Tutorials
AMITY      Sri Chaitanya