Counselling Zone

Cool goIITian

Joined: 18 Dec 2006
Post: 62
22 May 2007 17:28:47 IST
0 People liked this
17
999 View Post
doubt in phy jee experts pls help
Engineering Entrance , JEE Main , JEE Advanced

Sir, i have a doubt in the reason assertion question asked in jee 2007
the question is
STATEMENT  1  a cloth covers a table. Some dishes are kept on it.The cloth can be pulled without dislodging the dishes from table
STATEMENT 2 : EVERY ACTION HAS A EQUAL AND OPP REACTION
 
Now many ppl have said that the reason is inertia
But i'm thinking like this please tell me where i am wrong
Consider the cloth and dishes as one system
Because the cloth is being pulled with a certain acceleration(non inertial frame)
pseudo force is valid and that acts on the dishes only to balance both forces.So the dishes don't move
Compare this situation to the famous wedge-block situation don't you consider pseudo force when the wedge move
That's what i felt
Pls notify if i'm wrong in any way



Comments (17)


Blazing goIITian

Joined: 3 May 2007
Posts: 376
22 May 2007 17:35:15 IST
0 people liked this

pseudo force is not real force so i think u shdnt considr that nd take ground as reference

Cool goIITian

Joined: 18 Dec 2006
Posts: 62
22 May 2007 17:36:30 IST
0 people liked this

it is not a real force so what?? it is some type of force right

Blazing goIITian

Joined: 3 May 2007
Posts: 376
22 May 2007 17:38:13 IST
0 people liked this

it is nt a force at all man
it is applied just to solve problems thats it

Blazing goIITian

Joined: 3 May 2007
Posts: 376
22 May 2007 17:39:07 IST
0 people liked this

it is not any kinda force

Blazing goIITian

Joined: 3 May 2007
Posts: 376
22 May 2007 17:46:09 IST
0 people liked this

why do we apply pseudo force??
well to find out the actual force on a body
we do it
if u r on a non inertial ref frame u ll nt be able to find actual force...isliye we apply pseund by doing so u get the actual force on the body

Cool goIITian

Joined: 18 Dec 2006
Posts: 62
22 May 2007 17:58:03 IST
0 people liked this

ok sit on the table itself along with the dishes
which frame of reference are you in now?
how can yyou find the actual force now?
Pseudo force is the only force
the answer is INDEPENDENT of the frame of reference
so if you are on a non inertial frame of reference or an inertial frame the answer's the sam
i think mine shud be the answer but still not sure
experts????

Cool goIITian

Joined: 18 Dec 2006
Posts: 62
22 May 2007 17:59:31 IST
0 people liked this

And what do you mean by "it is used to solve problems"
What is this then?
 
Sharan Subramaniyan's Avatar

Scorching goIITian

Joined: 30 Mar 2007
Posts: 216
22 May 2007 18:11:21 IST
0 people liked this

@coolyog:
if u r sitting in a car and you experience an outward F (and smash ur face on the windows) when the car is turning right??
WHAT THE HELL IS THAT FORCE???
its centriFUGAL force, which is a pseudo force.
so, pseudo forces are valid in non inertial frames (such as turning car) and IN THAT FRAME, ther ARE REAL!!!!!!!!!!!!

@rahul_12345:
see, in the question 1, it is said "without dislodging the dishes"
is u consider the cloth frame, the dishes are dislodged (moved wrt the cloth). So, i think it is already implied by that, that they r talking about ground frame. (ie. the dishes are dislodged in the cloth frame, so the question of taking that as ur frame is itself wrong in this q)
Once it is ground frame, it is clear na? No pseudo F nothin, so it has to be only inertia...

do u think im correct? yes? oh! then do RATE me...
Amit Kumar's Avatar

Hot goIITian

Joined: 29 Apr 2007
Posts: 175
22 May 2007 18:12:39 IST
0 people liked this

Dear Rahul,

Please clarify your argument. Which frame of reference are you taking into account and which force is Pseudo force balancing ?


Cool goIITian

Joined: 18 Dec 2006
Posts: 62
22 May 2007 18:30:05 IST
0 people liked this

See what i say is it is an accerelating frame of reference when you are positioned on the dishes
in that case there will be this pseudo force acting on the dishes
since there is no other force present these forces have to be balanced for the system not to move
So in that case the reason has to be true
PLS READ THE QUESTION IT IS MENTIONED AS A  ACCELERATING FRAME
coz you are dislodging the cloth alright so u are the cloth's reference frame so obviously it  is a accelerating frame of reference
U don't pull the cloth with uniform vel  Do you'??????
Amit Kumar's Avatar

Hot goIITian

Joined: 29 Apr 2007
Posts: 175
22 May 2007 18:48:23 IST
0 people liked this

Yeah !! You are right Rahul.

From the frame of reference of table cloth, a Pseudo force is acting on the dishes,because they do not move from ground frame. Very True. But then, what is causing this Pseudo force to act ??

Here you need to understand the concept of Pseudo force. It is not an actual force. It is a consequence of inertia. Inertia tries play it's role to stop the dishes from moving. But in a non inertial frame, a Pseudo force has to be considered in order to explain that inertia on the ground frame. The Pseudo force that a person in an accelerating  frame see is originated by the virtue of his being accelerated. Nobody applies it, but it comes side by side with an accelerating frame. Or in order to co-relate different non-inertial frames, the effects of an accelerated frame are explained by introducing an imaginary force, called the Pseudo force.

It's inertia from Ground. And on Table, it's the Pseudo force which originated to explain inertia on the ground. So the basic concept is Inertia only. Pseudo force is only to help us understand a law of Physics in a non accelerating frame as observed from an accelerating frame.

Rate me if you find it useful or knock me back if you are still in trouble.

Cool goIITian

Joined: 18 Dec 2006
Posts: 62
22 May 2007 19:01:05 IST
0 people liked this

Are you sure
i kinda disagree with your arguement
Tell me why do you consider pseudo forces
eg: where do centrifugal forces come from they are pseudo forces  after all
Caonsider a string rotating in a circular motion
what happenes if centrifugal force wud not act it wudnt have continued it's path
So here pseudo force does balance it
where does it originate from? it comes therby coz the sys in eq
 
 
aman's Avatar

Blazing goIITian

Joined: 17 Dec 2006
Posts: 519
22 May 2007 19:14:57 IST
0 people liked this

see u urself have consodered the cloth plus dishes to be the system ... then whatever force is acting on the cloth is acting on the dishes as well ... then from what point does pseudo force comes ... it will only be there if ur system is considered to be the cloth only ... that is the mistake in ur thinking
edison's Avatar

Forum Expert
Joined: 19 Oct 2006
Posts: 7797
22 May 2007 19:59:07 IST
1 people liked this

Ofcourse pseudo force is a force.
 
It is called pseudo as it is acting in non-inertial frame to make newton's law applicable.
 
So it is force and we cannot deny that by simply assuming it pseudo as the name is a misnomer and sometimes mislead.
 
In the case of cloth when suddenly pulled without dislodging the dishes, the reason is enormous force applied or impulse is high (sudden change in momentum) and thus the time of interaction of dishes via surface is ot enough toi dislode the dishes, or we can say that the instantaneous frictional force tends to ZERO.
Sharan Subramaniyan's Avatar

Scorching goIITian

Joined: 30 Mar 2007
Posts: 216
22 May 2007 21:14:20 IST
0 people liked this

people, pls read my earlier post in this topic and tell me if a am right or wrong...

Blazing goIITian

Joined: 3 May 2007
Posts: 376
22 May 2007 22:24:01 IST
0 people liked this

mr last min genius....ur ex is gud  but man  thats not a force...infact  itzz ur experience  ur intution  wich has made u feel that it is the force...dude  if u tie a stone to  a thread nd   set it into circular motion ...then cut the thread..it will move tangentially...not b coz of the force  but b coz of the tangential velocity...ur going by intution  read physics frm hcv....
 
what u experience is not a force...it feels like a force due to tangential velocity...wen a car accelerates...u tend to move backk...dude itz not  b coz of the force on u..but b cozof the force on the car that makes u feel u maove back...they r NOT REAL...nd ITZZ NOT A MISNOMER mind IT. okay..everything is nt misnomer in physix..the xplanation wich u gav  to rahul is also not rite..
@ rahul..itz  just to make  physics  easy..to solve problems...physics can be studied without taking into account the pseudo forces...all problesm can be solved frm ground ref frame but it b comes tough sumtimes dude....

Blazing goIITian

Joined: 3 May 2007
Posts: 376
22 May 2007 22:35:42 IST
0 people liked this

..suppose u r sitting on a body wich is undergoing uniform circular motion.....a force is being experienced by the body towards the center wich produces a change in velocity towards the center(direction of vel changes towards center).....now u sit on it.....if u measure the acc of the body ull find it is zero coz u r also acc with it..it appears stationary to u.....so U APPLY CENTRIFUGAL FORCE(pseudo)...to that particle....nd equate it to tension wich gives actual acc of the particle.....got it??/if not then ask me ill xplain...better read hcv properly.
i hav this much to say..i know im rite.....nd this is my last post here..i acnt xplain more......if ur nt satisfied then ask profs...im a physix geek ....i m confident enough



Quick Reply


Reply

Some HTML allowed.
Keep your comments above the belt or risk having them deleted.
Signup for a avatar to have your pictures show up by your comment
If Members see a thread that violates the Posting Rules, bring it to the attention of the Moderator Team
Free Sign Up!

Preparing for JEE?

Kickstart your preparation with new improved study material - Books & Online Test Series for JEE 2014/ 2015


@ INR 4,950/-

For Quick Info

Name

Mobile

E-mail

City

Class

Find Posts by Topics

Physics

Topics

Mathematics

Chemistry

Biology

Parents Corner

Board

Fun Zone

Sponsored Ads
Vertical Limit

Top Contributors
All Time This Month Last Week
1. Bipin Dubey
Altitude - 16545 m
Post - 7958
2. Himanshu
Altitude - 10925 m
Post - 3836
3. Hari Shankar
Altitude - 9960 m
Post - 2185
4. edison
Altitude - 10815 m
Post - 7797
5. Sagar Saxena
Altitude - 8625 m
Post - 8064
6. Yagyadutt Mishr..
Altitude - 6330 m
Post - 1979