sign up I login
 advanced
refer a friend - earn nickels!!

Ask & Discuss Questions with Community & Experts

Moderation Team
 90 chars left    advanced
Ask iit jee aieee pet cbse icse state board community Community Discussion Question: Exponential eqn
Forum Index -> Differential Calculus like the article? email it to a friend.  
Author Message
hsbhatt (5010)

Forum Expert Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 944  [1089 rates]

hsbhatt's Avatar

total posts: 1508    
offline Offline
Find x such that
 
2001x+2004x = 2002x+2003x

Time wounds all heels
    
anchitsaini (4352)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 796  [982 rates]

anchitsaini's Avatar

total posts: 1242    
online Online
0

Impossible To be Impossible is Impossible
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
akhil_o (2709)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 435  [702 rates]

akhil_o's Avatar

total posts: 1451    
offline Offline
2002x-2001x=2004x-2003x
2002=2001+1

(2001+1)x-2001x=(2003+1)x-2003x

expanding we get

1+xC1(2001)+xC2(2001)2+....xCx-1(2001)x-1=1+xC1(2003)+xC2(2003)2+....xCx-1(2003)x-1

so only value for x can be 0 and 1

" Always remember money isn't everything but make sure you have made a lot of it before talking such nonsense!"
- Bill Gates
 this reply: 5 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 1 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
hsbhatt (5010)

Forum Expert Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 944  [1089 rates]

hsbhatt's Avatar

total posts: 1508    
offline Offline
Good. Any other approaches. You can take a hint from the category under which it is posted.
 
I said any other approach, because the above one is not completely legitimate. I dont think all of us are comfortable with binomial theorem applied to real numbers. There is something more to be done

Time wounds all heels
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
sti (77)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 11  [22 rates]

sti's Avatar

total posts: 361    
offline Offline
2001x+2004x/2002x +2003x =1
 
takin log on both sides
log 2001^x+2004^x=log 2004^x+2003^x
differentiating on both sides and using formula
d/dx(a^x)=a^x log a
d/dx(log x)=1/x
we will get the ans
 
hope method is right!!
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
hsbhatt (5010)

Forum Expert Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 944  [1089 rates]

hsbhatt's Avatar

total posts: 1508    
offline Offline
Method I:
 
Write the equation as 2004x - 2003x = 2002x - 2001x 
 
Now, consider the function f(x) = px - (p-1)x for p>1.
 
f'(p) = x(px-1 - (p-1)x-1)
 
You can see that f'(x) = 0 for x=0 or x=1.
 
for any other value of x, f'(p) is a strictly monotonic function.
 
which means 2004x - 2003x = 2002x - 2001x only if x=0 or x =1.
 
 
 
 

Time wounds all heels
 this reply: 5 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 1 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
konichiwa2x (2342)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 440  [511 rates]

konichiwa2x's Avatar

total posts: 668    
offline Offline
To prove:  
 
CASE 1 : x > 1
 


 

 



It can be easily shown that

and as , ,
 
=>  
Hence no solution for x > 1.
 
CASE 2: x < 0
 
Let  sucht that .
 
  .
 
 
(proved above)  and .
 
=>  
 
Thus there are no solutions for x < 0 .
 
Case 3: x = 0 or x = 1
 
These 2 are the only solutions.

edit: I was typing out my solution when you posted your method, i guess this one is not so different.

Guide to latex:
http://www.goiit.com/posts/list/community-shelf-a-guide-to-latex-48056.htm

 this reply: 10 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 2 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
hsbhatt (5010)

Forum Expert Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 944  [1089 rates]

hsbhatt's Avatar

total posts: 1508    
offline Offline
Koni: What happens for 0<x<1.

Time wounds all heels
 this reply: 2 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 1 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
konichiwa2x (2342)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 440  [511 rates]

konichiwa2x's Avatar

total posts: 668    
offline Offline
 .
 
Similary, .
So the graphs of both f(x) and g(x) are concave upwards (a parabola opening upwards). Any 2 functions which satisfy this condition can intersect only at 2 points.

Guide to latex:
http://www.goiit.com/posts/list/community-shelf-a-guide-to-latex-48056.htm

 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
hsbhatt (5010)

Forum Expert Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 944  [1089 rates]

hsbhatt's Avatar

total posts: 1508    
offline Offline
There is one more approach, and this line of reasoning could also prove useful:
 
Again rewrite as 2004x - 2003x = 2002x - 2001x 
 
Now, consider f(t) = tx.
 
By Intermediate Value Theorem, there exists p[2004,2003] such that
 
xpx-1 =  2004x - 2003x /(2004-2003) = 2004x - 2003x
 
Similarly there exists q[2004,2003] such that
 
xqx-1 =  2002x - 2001x /(2002-2001) = 2002x - 2001x
 
Hence xpx-1 = xqx-1
 
or  x(px-1 -qx-1) = 0
 
Since p and q are distinct, x=0 or x=1 are the only possibilities.

Time wounds all heels
 this reply: 15 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 3 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
 
Forum Index -> Differential Calculus
Go to:   

Top Offers for goIITians
Correspondence Courses
Brilliant Tutorials
Narayana Institute
Aakash Institute
Classroom/Crash Courses
Narayana - Kota , Delhi , Others
Brilliant Tutorials - Class , Crash
Aakash Institute - Medical , Engg
Online Test Series
Brilliant Tutorials
Narayana Institute
Aakash Institute
Mahesh Tutorials
AMITY      Sri Chaitanya