| Author |
Message |
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 6 Aug 2007 00:34:20 IST
|
|
|
i got few problems in limit Q1> [ x] [ 0] [nsix/x] where n belongs to natural no.??? {[]=gif} Q2> [x ] [0 ] [ntanx/x] where n belongs to natural no.??? {[]=gif}
|
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 6 Aug 2007 13:30:48 IST
|
|
|
in both the problems the limit does not exist
[ x] [0+] [nsinx/x] =n-1 as sin(x)/x<1 for x>0
[ x] [0-] [nsinx/x] =n as sin(x)/x>1 for x<0
similarly
[ x] [0+] [ntanx/x] =n as tan(x)/x>1 for x>0
[ x] [0-] [ntanx/x] =n-1 as tan(x)/x<1 for x<0
so in both the questions limit does not exist.
|
~ANSHUMAN
I was born intellegent, education ruined me. |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 6 Aug 2007 14:08:43 IST
|
|
|
ia the answer n-1 in both the cases
|
<TABLE CELLSPACING="1" CELLPADDING="1" BORDER="0">
<TR><TD>
   
<DIV ALIGN="right">Animated Letters</DIV></TD></TR></TABLE>
RATE ME FOR MY EFFORTS....... |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 6 Aug 2007 17:39:14 IST
|
|
|
yes n - 1 in both cases
|
---------------------------------------------------------------
* Gaurav Ragtah ( aka Artemis Fowl )
* Agent 'G' [sniper] - SD-6 (Alliance of Twelve)
* Your friendly neighborhood spideyunlimited |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The important inequality to use here is tanx>x>sinx.So that would mean sinx/x<1 and tanx/x>1 .In the limiting case when x is close to 0,the 2 ratios get very close to 1.However they are never equal to 1 and maintain the respective inequalities mentioned.Hence in the first case the quantity in box is slightly less than n and hence answer is n-1.On the other hand the term in the 2nd function inside the box is slightly greater than n and hence answer is n.Another thing to note here is that since tanx/x and sinx/x remain positive on the left hand side of 0.So taking limit from that side too would yield the same answer.However the initial inequality used is valid between 0 and pi/2
|
this reply: 2 points
(with 0 
in 1 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 6 Aug 2007 20:10:23 IST
|
|
|
ok i accept ur answer asmit, still i have few conceptual doubts now please tell me Is [ x] [y ] [2 ] x 2+x+c = [ 2] [ x] [ y] x 2+x+c ???? why(or any function residing any expression) if so then cant we apply limit inside G.I.F and since we know that [ x] [0 ] sinx/x = 1 and [ x] [0 ] tanx/x = 1 then the value will depend upon the nature of n?
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 6 Aug 2007 20:55:37 IST
|
|
|
See limit can be taken inside f of f(g(x)) as long as it exists.I too did the same thing in my soln.I took the limit inside the box but I also mentioned the inequality.So in the limiting case we may write the 2 ratios as 1 but actually they are slightly less or more than 1.Hence the result.See that is where the inequality has to be applied because x tends to zero,not equal to it,so the inequality is strictly valid and therefore the result.
|
this reply: 5 points
(with 1 
in 1 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
|
|