| Author |
Message |
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 1 Jan 2008 17:49:28 IST
|
|
|
im getting the answer as 'e' but the answer is e/2
|
science-
the most fundamental
the most eternal
|
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 2 Jan 2008 09:53:36 IST
|
|
|
we can solve the problem using the series of log(1+x) and that of e^x.. let y=(1+x)^1/x then, log y = 1/x log (1+x) (since log (1+x)=x - x^2/2 +x^3 /3...) = 1/x[x - x^2/2+ x^3/3.......] log y =1- x/2+ x^2/3................ therefore, y= e^1- x/2 + x^2/3 ..... y= e * e^ - x/2 + x^2/3.... y= e* [1+ (-x/2 +x^2/3) + (-x/2 +x^2/3)^2 /2] (since e^x=1+x+x^2/2!..) y=e*[1-x/2 + 11x^2 /24] Lt x tends to 0 [e(1-x/2 + 11x^2 /24) +ex - e] /x Lt x tends to 0 [e - ex/2 + 11ex^2/24 + ex - e] /x ans =e/2
|
Bad news is that time always flies,
Good news is that u r the pilot.
yesterday is history,
tomorrow is a mystery,
today is a gift and that is why it's called "the present". |
this reply: 10 points
(with 2 
in 2 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 2 Jan 2008 11:45:00 IST
|
|
|
ya but suppose I did it this way lim as x tends to zero of first part in the numerator is e. then cancelling of the two e's i get ex in the numerator. x cancels and i get e.
|
science-
the most fundamental
the most eternal
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 2 Jan 2008 14:29:27 IST
|
|
|
i dont think u can just apply the limit in the numerator on one term and get the answer....if u do it then uve gotta do it with all the terms in that particular limit once the factor making the limit nonexistant dissapears.... so i agree with the cute baby one....
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 2 Jan 2008 18:31:01 IST
|
|
|
just check this solution
|
science-
the most fundamental
the most eternal
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 2 Jan 2008 22:14:54 IST
|
|
|
try by l hospital rule
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 3 Jan 2008 08:40:29 IST
|
|
|
@madman u cannot do that way... check out the last before step once again.... when u hav [e + [x ] [ 0]e(x - 1)]/x , how can u again apply limits to the whole expression like this [x ] [ 0] e + e(x - 1)/x. your procedure is totally wrong.
|
Bad news is that time always flies,
Good news is that u r the pilot.
yesterday is history,
tomorrow is a mystery,
today is a gift and that is why it's called "the present". |
this reply: 5 points
(with 1 
in 1 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 3 Jan 2008 13:36:31 IST
|
|
|
why is it limit as x tends to zero of e is 'e' itself so i can replace e with the limit and then i am just replaceing the limits expression by a common limit since it should again give the same thing lim(f(x)+g(x)=limf(x)+lim(g(x)=lim(f(x)+g(x)) its the same thing
|
science-
the most fundamental
the most eternal
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 4 Jan 2008 09:06:34 IST
|
|
|
but in the solution u are doing it like this...pls observe.... [ ] [ ] [F(x)+G(x)] = [ ] [ ] F(x)+ [ ] [ ] G(x) = [ ] [ ] [value obtained after applying the limits + G(x) ] u are solving half part after applying the limits and again u are applying the limits to that solved part...see carefully...
|
Bad news is that time always flies,
Good news is that u r the pilot.
yesterday is history,
tomorrow is a mystery,
today is a gift and that is why it's called "the present". |
this reply: 5 points
(with 1 
in 1 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 6 Jan 2008 23:44:36 IST
|
|
|
hey even i solved n got d lim of first part of num as 'e' n then solving d second part i got it as 'ex' nw since x tends to 0, ex also tends to 0 so even i got d ans as e.......... plz nudge me if u get d corr method n ans
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
|
|