| Author |
Message |
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 26 May 2008 11:42:12 IST
|
|
|
(\frac{cosx}{x.cosecx-1}))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Answer is 0,posting solution in next post plz wait
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 26 May 2008 11:52:18 IST
|
|
|

differentiating wrt x two times by LH rule

|
this reply: 2 points
(with 0 
in 1 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 26 May 2008 13:06:04 IST
|
|
|
wrong! Your denominator is wrong after twice differentiating!
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 26 May 2008 13:11:38 IST
|
|
|
I think the ans is -3,After differentiating twice by LH rule,we get,
Lim(-2sinx-xcosx/sinx)=Lim (-2)-[cosx/(sinx/x)] which tends to -2-(1/1)=-3 as x tends to 0.
|
MAKING A MISTAKE IS HUMAN BUT REPEATING IT IS IDIOTIC. |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 26 May 2008 13:18:45 IST
|
|
|
sorry !! that was my fault
xcosx / x-sinx
= 1/(secx- tanx/x )
= 1/infinite =0
|
I WAS BORN INTELLIGENT!!!!!!!
EDUCATION RUINED ME
<TABLE CELLSPACING="1" CELLPADDING="1" BORDER="0">
<TR><TD>
<DIV ALIGN="right">Glitter Graphics</DIV></TD></TR></TABLE>
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 26 May 2008 13:24:19 IST
|
|
|
@somye
u wil get after diffrentiating once
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 26 May 2008 13:24:42 IST
|
|
|
Are yaar..What is going on!. Somyekathait,the denominator must be 1-cosx and not -cosx.Check it.
|
MAKING A MISTAKE IS HUMAN BUT REPEATING IT IS IDIOTIC. |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 26 May 2008 13:27:20 IST
|
|
|
@
somyekathait diff of x is 1 nt 0
@
allamraju ;
thedumbheadwithnobrain;
Can sme1 explain me why????? every1 is diff the fn fr the 2nd time when its 1/0 and NOT 0/0 form .How can u apply LH rule ????
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 26 May 2008 13:39:26 IST
|
|
|
sorry !! that was my fault
xcosx / x-sinx
= 1/(secx- tanx/x )
= 1/infinite =0
|
I WAS BORN INTELLIGENT!!!!!!!
EDUCATION RUINED ME
<TABLE CELLSPACING="1" CELLPADDING="1" BORDER="0">
<TR><TD>
<DIV ALIGN="right">Glitter Graphics</DIV></TD></TR></TABLE>
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 26 May 2008 13:44:53 IST
|
|
|
u r again wrong
which is not defined
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 26 May 2008 13:45:55 IST
|
|
|
How does the infinite cme in den as x approaches 0 secx--->1 tanx/x--->1 so den--->0
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 26 May 2008 13:49:30 IST
|
|
|
Thanks Akku,I didn't observe that.When sandeep posted that there was an error in 2nd derivative in thumbhead's ans,I corrected that and evaluated the limit.He,later edited his message..Sorry for the mistake.
|
MAKING A MISTAKE IS HUMAN BUT REPEATING IT IS IDIOTIC. |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 26 May 2008 13:56:23 IST
|
|
|
yes, my first wrong was bcos the answer was wrong and the 2nd wrong was because the wrong answer's wrong method was wrong!
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 26 May 2008 13:59:13 IST
|
|
|
is the answer not defined since it is of form 1/0.....
|
FAILURE IS NOT FALLING IN LIFE BUT NOT RISING AGAIN AFTER FALLING!!!!!!
I LIKE WAVES NOT BECAUSE THEY RISE AND FALL..
BUT BECAUSE EVERYTIME THEY FALL THEY RISE AGAIN!!!!!!!
|
|
|