physics chemistry maths science forums
become expert I help I sign up I login
refer a friend - earn nickels!!   
 advanced
 
Home
Ask & Discuss Questions
Study Material
Experts Zone
Hang Out!

Ask & Discuss Questions with Community & Experts

Moderation Team
 90 chars left    advanced
Ask iit jee aieee pet cbse icse state board community Community Discussion Question: A Few Conceptual Problems
Forum Index -> Electricity like the article? email it to a friend.  
Author Message
kane (2179)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 391  [503 rates]

kane's Avatar

total posts: 812    
offline Offline
1.why the dielectric constant of an insulator can never be infinite whereas that of a conductor is infinite?(plz also tell me the physical significance of dielectric constant)
 
2.a positively charged rod is brought near an uncharged conductor.if the rod is then suddenly withdrawn the charge left on the conductor will be
a-positive   b-zero   c-negative    d-none
(answer is b)
(plz tell me why the answer is not c)
 
3.which among the following is a sure test of electrification?
a-attraction    b-induction    c-repulsion   d-conduction
(answer is c)
 
4.when a positively charged conductor is earth connected
a-electrons flow from conductor to earth
b-no charge flow occurs
c-protons flow from conductor to earth
d-electrons flow from earth to conductor
(answer is b)
(plz tell me why the answer is not c and also tell me exactly what is earthing)

there are numerous options besides I.I.T

<TABLE CELLSPACING="1" CELLPADDING="1" BORDER="0">
<TR><TD>


<DIV ALIGN="right">Glitter Graphics</DIV></TD></TR></TABLE>









    
zamuka (43)

Hot goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 7  [11 rates]

zamuka's Avatar

total posts: 172    
offline Offline
firstly, dielectric cons is a inverse measure of the tendency of a material to let the electric field through it.....since a conductor doesn't allow so it has infinite......
 
2 charging thru induction doesn't involve transfer of charges.....so net charge will remain 0 as before.....
 
3)repulsion is a sure test for electrification as attraction can b bet 1 charged and 1 uncharged body but repulsion is only bet 2 charged bodies(that too opp charged..)
 
4)when apositively charged conduc is connec to earth,electrons will flow frm earth to it....ur ans given is wrong....
 this reply: 5 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 1 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
kane (2179)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 391  [503 rates]

kane's Avatar

total posts: 812    
offline Offline
thnxs a lot for replying but only your 3rd answer convinces me.in 1st answer you have written conductors do not allow,yeh kaise ho sakta hain.or induction se bhi toh body charge hoti.e.g. if we bring a positively charged rod near a body,it gets negatively charged after earthing.

there are numerous options besides I.I.T

<TABLE CELLSPACING="1" CELLPADDING="1" BORDER="0">
<TR><TD>


<DIV ALIGN="right">Glitter Graphics</DIV></TD></TR></TABLE>









 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
sid.shah.90 (601)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 103  [146 rates]

sid.shah.90's Avatar

total posts: 358    
offline Offline
Dielectric constant of a medium is a factor by which forces between two charged particles at rest is decreased by as compared to force when in vacuum
for eg. If force is F in vacuum then in a medium of dielectric constt. k, force will now be F/k

______________________________________________
Siddhant Shah


The trouble with doing something right the first time is that nobody appreciates how difficult it is.
You can't control the wind, but you can adjust your sails.
 this reply: 7 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 2 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
sid.shah.90 (601)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 103  [146 rates]

sid.shah.90's Avatar

total posts: 358    
offline Offline
(2)Look as the charge is conserved on the conductor( it is not connected or earthed), so as soon as the attractive force from the rod is removed, the electrons reorient themselves again so that the body becomes fully neutral

(3) If we bring an uncharged body near a charged one, they will attract each other, but won't repel in any situation...so repulsion can occur only if both bodies are charged.eg uncharged paper bits are attracted by charged comb

(4) Earthing is actually the process of making potential of body = zero
btw, answer should be (d) and not (b), plz check
because to make potential of conductor = zero, negative electrons must flow from earth into conductor


______________________________________________
Siddhant Shah


The trouble with doing something right the first time is that nobody appreciates how difficult it is.
You can't control the wind, but you can adjust your sails.
 this reply: 10 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 2 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
kane (2179)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 391  [503 rates]

kane's Avatar

total posts: 812    
offline Offline
still having problem in 1 and 4

there are numerous options besides I.I.T

<TABLE CELLSPACING="1" CELLPADDING="1" BORDER="0">
<TR><TD>


<DIV ALIGN="right">Glitter Graphics</DIV></TD></TR></TABLE>









 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
sid.shah.90 (601)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 103  [146 rates]

sid.shah.90's Avatar

total posts: 358    
offline Offline
Look, lemme put it this way--
(1) electric field in any conductor (in electrostats) is always 0.
Now dielecric constt. can also be said to be factorr by which elec field in a medium dec.
So As E=0 in conductor thus, k = infinity



(2) Potential will be zero if net charge = 0
So electrons will flow from earth to conductor to make charge = 0
Plz recheck answer for (4)

______________________________________________
Siddhant Shah


The trouble with doing something right the first time is that nobody appreciates how difficult it is.
You can't control the wind, but you can adjust your sails.
 this reply: 10 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 2 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
kane (2179)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 391  [503 rates]

kane's Avatar

total posts: 812    
offline Offline
why electric field of a conductor is zero?
 
and i have rechecked answer is b only and the explanation given in book is 'the conductor looses charge.'

there are numerous options besides I.I.T

<TABLE CELLSPACING="1" CELLPADDING="1" BORDER="0">
<TR><TD>


<DIV ALIGN="right">Glitter Graphics</DIV></TD></TR></TABLE>









 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
sid.shah.90 (601)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 103  [146 rates]

sid.shah.90's Avatar

total posts: 358    
offline Offline
See, as said in the book, the conductor loses its charge...
u know, protons don't move in conduction, its only the electrons(protons are like kernels with electrons as mobile with metallic bonds between them)

To prove electric field in a conductor is zero,
the conductor is an equipotential surface, so theres no component of field along the conductor's surface
As E=-dV/dr
now conductor is equipotential, dv/dr = 0
Thus, E = 0


______________________________________________
Siddhant Shah


The trouble with doing something right the first time is that nobody appreciates how difficult it is.
You can't control the wind, but you can adjust your sails.
 this reply: 10 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 2 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
suresan (272)

Hot goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 44  [70 rates]

suresan's Avatar

total posts: 184    
offline Offline
soppose there is electric field in side a conductor then the free electrons within the conductor will re-arrange themselves because of this electric field till it becomes zero.
 this reply: 7 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 2 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
kane (2179)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 391  [503 rates]

kane's Avatar

total posts: 812    
offline Offline
alright 1st question ka abhi bhi kuch pata nahin chala par if you tell me the physical and not bookish meaning of dielectric constant i will be able to understand

there are numerous options besides I.I.T

<TABLE CELLSPACING="1" CELLPADDING="1" BORDER="0">
<TR><TD>


<DIV ALIGN="right">Glitter Graphics</DIV></TD></TR></TABLE>









 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
sid.shah.90 (601)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 103  [146 rates]

sid.shah.90's Avatar

total posts: 358    
offline Offline
This is the physical meaning itself dude!

lemme give u a formula which will help:

charge induced on a body in a medium of dielectric constt k by another body with charge Q is given by:

Qinduced = Q[1-1/k]

______________________________________________
Siddhant Shah


The trouble with doing something right the first time is that nobody appreciates how difficult it is.
You can't control the wind, but you can adjust your sails.
 this reply: 7 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 2 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
suresan (272)

Hot goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 44  [70 rates]

suresan's Avatar

total posts: 184    
offline Offline
if we place a body in a uniform electric field some times the electric field lines will prefer to pass through it crowding in and some times they tend to move away avoiding it. Then the electric field line density will not be the same inside and out side. the ratio of the electric field line dinsity outside to the electric field line density inside is the dielectric constant.
 this reply: 5 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 1 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate