| Author |
Message |
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 7 Apr 2008 09:50:26 IST
|
|
|
a parallel plate capacitor of capacitance C (without dielectrics ) is filled by dielectric slabs as shown in figure. then the new capacitance of the capacitor is: a 3.9C b 4C c 2.4C d 3C
|
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 7 Apr 2008 09:54:05 IST
|
|
|
Easy!!!
Hint:
The two small capacitors are in parallel (at the bottom), which in turn is in series with the one at the top.
|
Will nip in at times to solve problems :)
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 7 Apr 2008 10:01:08 IST
|
|
|
@karthik
wat's yur answer
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 7 Apr 2008 10:16:26 IST
|
|
|
my ans is 4C. is it right??
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 7 Apr 2008 13:32:13 IST
|
|
|
it's wrong........!!!!!
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 7 Apr 2008 13:48:49 IST
|
|
|
ans is 3c as karthik said 2c and 4c are in parallel so c eff for dem is 6c now d 2 6c s are in series, 6c*6c/12c 3c
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 7 Apr 2008 14:37:17 IST
|
|
|
@elastiboysai
how will the capacity of upper half be 6C??
it should be 12C........
plz check once again
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 7 Apr 2008 20:48:11 IST
|
|
|
@elastiboysai yur answer is also wrong....!!
this question came in my iit pattern test and i marked 4C as answer and in fact i was thinking why did anyone put this soooo very easy question in the IIT PATTERN TEST but was shocked to see the answer... it's 3.9 C
in the solution booklet the solution is given but i can't understand it they have written that the two small capaitors are not at equal potential difference so they can't be taken as parallel.....
can sumbdy explain this....pleeeeez
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 7 Apr 2008 20:54:31 IST
|
|
|
are the lower two dielectrics have equal area
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 7 Apr 2008 21:00:29 IST
|
|
|
yes i think they have equal area
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 8 Apr 2008 19:56:54 IST
|
|
|
3.9C is the right ans. as the lower two dielectrics will provide two way of induction of charges in the capacitor one from k=2 and one from k=4 and then they will be sepratelty induced to k=6 with opposite charge
now try it and tell me
|
this reply: 5 points
(with 1 
in 1 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 9 Apr 2008 19:32:58 IST
|
|
|
bharat plz explain again ... i don't get it
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 9 Apr 2008 20:28:57 IST
|
|
|
You guys have probably mixed up the areas and the widths of the plates. Please check your calculations
|
Will nip in at times to solve problems :)
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 23 Apr 2008 17:02:14 IST
|
|
|
There is no reason why the two small capacitors must be at the same potential difference....... while solving such problems, we assume a thin metal plate between the dielectrics and take them as combinations of capacitors.......... a metal plate implies same potential at the interface which in turn means the potential difference across the two capacitors is the same..... but there is no plate, so no question of taking equal potentials or potential differences...... as the solution goes, divide the larger capacitor into two halves... each of capacitance 6 C....... then 2,6 in series give 2*6/2+6=12/8 and 4,6 give 4*6/4+6=24/10 these in parallel... so, they add up to give 39/10or 3.9 C
|
this reply: 5 points
(with 1 
in 1 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
|
|