| Author |
Message |
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 13 Jan 2007 14:09:01 IST
|
|
|
Hi, in many books i have seen that they give two derivations/formulae for electric field of thin infinite uniformly charged plane sheet- one for one sided charged:  /2 0 and one for two sided charged:  / 0 (  being the charge density). I don't understand what is the meaning of one sided and two sided charged? Besides, is there anything like two-sided charged? Pls reply.
|
Ankit
Aspirant for JEE-2007 |
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 13 Jan 2007 14:38:48 IST
|
|
|
U CAN SAY THAT THE 2ND EXPRESSION IS THE ELECTRIC FIELD BETWEEN TWO OPPOSITE CHARDED PLATES EXAMPLE INSIDE A PARRALLEL PLATE CAPACITOR N 1ST 1 IS FOR A SINGLE PLATE
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 13 Jan 2007 15:06:52 IST
|
|
|
The electric feild at (or very near to ) the surface of an conductor is give as /
|
-------------------------------------
----------------------------------------
Jatinpreet Singh
LOOKING FOR COLLEGE |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 13 Jan 2007 16:46:58 IST
|
|
|
@ jatinpreet
I dont understand wat is the meaning of "at (or very near to )" . The electric field lines emerge out of the plane sheet prependicularly and the field thus, is contant everywhere.
|
Ankit
Aspirant for JEE-2007 |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 13 Jan 2007 21:08:42 IST
|
|
|
Hey ankit there is no need of any confussion on this.The 1st formula i.e  /2  is used when the plate is very very thin(i.e its thickness is almost negligible). But for a thick plate we cannot ignore its thickness thus we consider it as a combination of two very thin plates and thus the resultant answer is  /  I am very sure of my answer but if you have any doubts you can ask it . You can get them easily in books like RESHNICK HALLIDAY ,H.C VERMA OR P.PRAKASHAN.
|
PLZ DONT RATE ME FOR MY ANSWERS,IF U WANT TO COMPLIMENT ME THEN JUST HELP ANY OTHER IN FUTURE AS I AM DOING IT NOW
FILL THE UNFORGIVING MINUTE WITH 60 SECONDS THEN THE LIFE WILL BE YOURS
The woods are lovely, dark &deep
But I have promises to keep
And miles to go before I sleep
And miles to go before I sleep
-Robert Frost
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 14 Jan 2007 15:40:32 IST
|
|
|
good question...this ques i believe all students preparing for jee asks.....see first ans comes directly from gauss law...right???now the second part  /  is the electric field of a CONDUCTOR at any point infinetly close to the surface...now what is a conductror???a body with charge uniformly distributed through out..that ans y thereis charge on both the sides....secondlt it is not valid only for plate but for any conductor bt at a point really close.... TIP:second formula is rarely used..1 in 1000 times so if u r confused its a safe bet to go with the first one.....
|
a 2nd year IIT DELHI student, doing B.Tech in chemical engineering |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 14 Jan 2007 18:01:05 IST
|
|
|
well u see the explanation given in resnic and halliday is not that clear, read the book "lectures on physics"- by Richard. Feynman.
he giv's it like this
in a conducting metal plate charges are spread on both sides equally, so electric field at each side is given by ?/2? 0---(1) (according to gauss law?E.F due to non conducting insulator plate has charge on one side only?check in resnic and halliday) ---so for total :- ?/? 0, for a cap'r since the opp charged plates are kept close together charge only exist on one side. Therefore E.F is
same as (1) i.e ?/2? for each plate on one side . thus total E.F due to cap?r is
?/2? 0 + ?/2? 0 = ?/? 0 ??
H.C Verma is also has simplified explanation than "lectures on physics"....
|
Science is vision multiplied!
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
|
|