Home » Ask & Discuss » Physics. » Electricity « Back to Discussion



Electricity

Blazing goIITian

Joined: 31 Jan 2007
Post: 1069
16 Mar 2008 18:34:01 IST
0 People liked this
17
647 View Post
Will it be SHM rates assured
None

Electric field and a dipole are in same direction

when dipole is deflected in small angles does it exhibit SHM

Please also give correct reason rates assure for appropiate ans


Share this article on:

Comments (17)

raghu  narayanan's Avatar

Cool goIITian

Joined: 13 Mar 2008
Posts: 70
16 Mar 2008 18:51:08 IST
0 people liked this

i don think so

it will execute torque if it is deflected to an angle
gokul subramanian's Avatar

Blazing goIITian

Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Posts: 1451
16 Mar 2008 18:56:55 IST
1 people liked this

@ supralara:
what do u mean by it executes "torque"?????

Hot goIITian

Joined: 10 Mar 2008
Posts: 186
16 Mar 2008 19:00:29 IST
0 people liked this

I think it does not because
For simple harmonic motion you need inertia and restoring force.
In this case there is restoring force but no inertia.( A dipole does not have euther mass or momentom). Therefore it does not execute SHM. But suppose the Charges are acuumulated on a body of specific mass to make a dipole then it may execute periodic motion. But it would not be SHM. The condition for shm is that the restoring force must be proportional to the displacement from mean position.
gokul subramanian's Avatar

Blazing goIITian

Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Posts: 1451
16 Mar 2008 19:02:49 IST
0 people liked this

suresan(sir) for shm all u need is a=-w^2 * x
EDIT: i din no tht u were an adult..sorry :)


Hot goIITian

Joined: 10 Mar 2008
Posts: 186
16 Mar 2008 19:11:06 IST
0 people liked this

Yes  sure enough, but if you want to get that relationship, you need the driving forces to move the object to and fro. The conditions shown are from the original concepts that we had learned in SHM.  Could you Please check it with any references? May be I am wrong.     I hope I am not confused. See if you can get an example of SHM which does not follow these condition. I am really curious.
gokul subramanian's Avatar

Blazing goIITian

Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Posts: 1451
16 Mar 2008 19:14:30 IST
0 people liked this

to put it in layman's terms
1st of all a chrg has mass..tho extrmely small..wat im sayin is tht mass will get cancelled on both sides.. so basically the shm if possible is neway independent of mass


Hot goIITian

Joined: 10 Mar 2008
Posts: 186
16 Mar 2008 19:27:26 IST
0 people liked this

OK I agree with that part. Even then will the periodic motion be SHM. We need to check whether the electrostatic force on the dipole is proprtional to the displacement from equillibrium position for small amplitudes
gokul subramanian's Avatar

Blazing goIITian

Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Posts: 1451
16 Mar 2008 19:44:57 IST
1 people liked this

assuming the question states direction of dipole moment n tht of field r same:
hence this amts to in a positive field a positive chrg on top,a neg chrg below it...if v resolve the force acting on it v c tht the force torque acting is proportional to -sin-..
hence it will execute shm

Blazing goIITian

Joined: 31 Jan 2007
Posts: 1069
16 Mar 2008 22:24:17 IST
0 people liked this

ya the ans is given it will be shm but computer i could not get ur point can u plz be more clear
gokul subramanian's Avatar

Blazing goIITian

Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Posts: 1451
16 Mar 2008 22:29:59 IST
3 people liked this

c wat i mean is this:
1st of all in a field there is a dipole... only if the dipole moment n field r parallel a restorin torque acts..if they r antiparallel then the torque wud push it further awy from mean position..
to find out what i am saying...u jus draw a dig urself..
u will c tht it is the sin@ component tht provides thye torque needed...n u will get the torque directly proportional to sin@..
sin@ approx equals @ as @ v.small..the condition necessary  for shm is torque proportional to @..which is satisfied here..
gokul subramanian's Avatar

Blazing goIITian

Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Posts: 1451
16 Mar 2008 22:33:05 IST
0 people liked this

i hope u r able to get it clearer now

Blazing goIITian

Joined: 15 Apr 2007
Posts: 965
16 Mar 2008 22:41:18 IST
1 people liked this

hey hey there will be shm and....

see this is my thinking,.....

since the electric field is uniform.... the value of torque will be =pEsin

but since angle is small we have......

=pE

this shows that torque is directly prop. to the angular disp. ..

and hence the motion due to this torque will be an angular shm one...

now since =pE ,

and so torque is directly proportional  to ...

and the constant of proprtionality k=pE

but k= I(omega)^2..

hence I(omega)^2=pE

and hence frequency of this shm is (1/2Pi)(under root of (pE/I))



Blazing goIITian

Joined: 15 Apr 2007
Posts: 965
16 Mar 2008 22:42:31 IST
0 people liked this

so we get the freq. of the shm.. so there will be shm..

Blazing goIITian

Joined: 15 Apr 2007
Posts: 965
16 Mar 2008 22:46:09 IST
0 people liked this

what say everyone ????

arr yaar.. koi toh bolo .. is the above explanation of mine correct >??

Blazing goIITian

Joined: 31 Jan 2007
Posts: 1069
16 Mar 2008 22:57:00 IST
0 people liked this

thanks computer and study id i am now clear
now i understood that

it will be shm if torque is directly prop. to the angular disp. ..

thanks every one u have been rated


Hot goIITian

Joined: 10 Mar 2008
Posts: 186
20 Mar 2008 23:19:58 IST
2 people liked this

computer 001 your arguments are perfect. All the necessary condition for SHM are shown. And I accept it. But still I tell you one little secret, whenever i workout this question(Which i do almost every year) i tell the students that it does not follow shm for two reasons.
1. Many of the students they do not check the necessary condition for SHM in such cases. For them any periodic motion is SHM.
2. Theoretically it is less robust to assume, when explaining electrostatics, that charges are asociated with paricles alone. Because many of the basic theorems in electrostatics do not require that charges are associated with mass.
In every case since you have considered all the details, i accept your solution absolutely.
gokul subramanian's Avatar

Blazing goIITian

Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Posts: 1451
20 Mar 2008 23:30:24 IST
1 people liked this

yes sir..i agree..i too have sometimes been inclined to think tht any periodic motion itself is SHM..n every time i have to keep telling myself not to make tht mistake.. thts a very important pt uve mentioned..thnks 4 ur time



Quick Reply


Reply

Some HTML allowed.
Keep your comments above the belt or risk having them deleted.
Signup for a avatar to have your pictures show up by your comment
If Members see a thread that violates the Posting Rules, bring it to the attention of the Moderator Team
Free Sign Up!

Preparing for IIT-JEE ?

Arihant Revision Package for IIT JEE - Books, Practice Tests + Rank Predictor


@ INR 1,995/-

For Quick Info

Name

Mobile No.

Find Posts by Topics

Physics.

Topics

Mathematics.

Chemistry.

Biology

Parents

Board

Fun Zone

Sponsored Ads