| Author |
Message |
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 11 Jan 2008 17:08:01 IST
|
|
|
the diagram shows 3 infinitely long uniform line charges placed on the X,Y,Z axes...... the work done in moving a unit positive chrge from (1,1,1) (0,1,1) is equal to:
here @ is the linear charge density please reply
|
this word is so small that it is a foolishness to hate anyone.
so, we love all. |
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 12 Jan 2008 17:19:13 IST
|
|
|
hello???
|
this word is so small that it is a foolishness to hate anyone.
so, we love all. |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 13 Jan 2008 15:14:01 IST
|
|
|
Calculate potential at both points due to all three wires and find potential difference.
That would be the work done...
|
"If you win, you shall not have to explain and if you lose, you wont be there to explain"
~ Adolph Hitler |
this reply: 2 points
(with 0 
in 1 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 13 Jan 2008 17:05:12 IST
|
|
|
@ purav, thnx 4 it. since my this portion is weak will u please help me by telling me ki (1,1,1) and (1,1,0) par electric field kaise calculate hoga...
|
this word is so small that it is a foolishness to hate anyone.
so, we love all. |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 13 Jan 2008 18:01:58 IST
|
|
|
We know that potential due to a single wire = @ / 2 pi o ln ( r ) + const So we have potential at ( x, y , z ) V = 1 / 4pi { @ 1 ln ( y^ 2 + z^2 ) + @ 2 ln ( z^2 + x^2 ) + @3 ln ( x^2 + y^2 ) } + const where @ s are corresponding linear charge density of x , y , z axes respectively . Now calculate the potential diff . ( const term cancels out ) ans is 5@ /(4 pi o) ln ( 1/2 )
|
this reply: 2 points
(with 0 
in 1 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 15 Jan 2008 23:12:59 IST
|
|
|
@ feymann, that is good but my actual doubt is: in bansal notes i read: 2 k landa ln(R/x)
whare R is the distance from the wire at which the potential iis assumed to be o. how does this: y^ 2 + z^2 fit here... plaese xpalin
|
this word is so small that it is a foolishness to hate anyone.
so, we love all. |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
That , what u have found in notes is absolutely right. Here the const term does the work for R . It does not come into picture as we are only interested in potential difference . ( You may try the same problem by ln ( R/ x ) also , all the ln ( R ) terms will cancel ) . Now regarding ur second doubt see sqrt ( y^2 + z^2 ) is the distance of the pt ( x, y, z ) from the x axis etc . Hope u have got it now .
|
this reply: 2 points
(with 0 
in 1 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 17 Jan 2008 23:07:53 IST
|
|
|
@ fey sir, thanks a lot ...........
|
this word is so small that it is a foolishness to hate anyone.
so, we love all. |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
|
|