| Author |
Message |
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 19 Jan 2008 19:38:56 IST
|
|
|
how come electric current is a fundamental physical quantity?is it not derived from charge and time?so shouldnt electric charge be the fundamental physical quantity?
|
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 19 Jan 2008 21:06:27 IST
|
|
|
its the 4 dimension
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 19 Jan 2008 22:06:52 IST
|
|
|
If I take current ( instead of charge ) what is the prob ? It is depending on me which one to choose . If u think charge should be THE fundamental qty instead of current ( influenced by reading electrostatics first ) then u are on the wrong track .
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 19 Jan 2008 22:38:05 IST
|
|
|
These are conventions accepted by international scientists and U cant go and fight with them over this issue. If U R preparing for IITJEE then dont worry, they will never ask u why current is a fundamental quantity. So dont waste ur time on such things.
|
The quality of a person's life is in direct proportion to their commitment to excellence, regardless of their chosen field of endeavor.
It is during our darkest moments that we must focus to see the light.
Check out my blog at:
http://tarinbansal.blogspot.com/
(A must see for every student)
Back to goiit, this time with Baby Veerappan. :D |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 19 Jan 2008 22:55:54 IST
|
|
|
No .... I appreciate this type of qn . See , if u have the proper understanding of the subject then u dont need to go for rank , rank will follow u . So , be cool & post whatever doubt comes to ur mind . Atleast , I am there to get benefit from it .
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well said feynmann. You stick true to the spirit of the great physicist after whom you have chosen your nick.
@aruthu, I don't know exactly why such a choice is made. What seems probable is that its is the operational reason. The presence of charge (as well as mass) is felt only by the effect it creates. One of these effects is current electricity, for which we cam measure reasonably well whatever we want. So even though the method is actually an indirect estimation of a more fundamental physical quantity, we do so because its easier.
I repeat however, that this is at best an educated guess. I urge all goiit members to put up more such questions so that we can all expand our knowledge. Further discussions on this topic would be lovely.
|
My Homepage
Bookmarks Updated ... A collection of answers by me
|
this reply: 2 points
(with 0 
in 1 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
|
|