| Author |
Message |
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 4 Apr 2008 20:19:46 IST
|
|
|
why is bond energy of F-F is less than Cl-Cl and Br-Br
|
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 4 Apr 2008 20:21:14 IST
|
|
|
F has smaller size, there is more interelectronic repulsion in F-F than in Cl-Cl and Br-Br bcos they have large size
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 4 Apr 2008 20:23:42 IST
|
|
|
hi the bond energy of F-F is less than that of Cl-Cl and Br-Br because
bond energy not only depend upon electronegativity but also on other factors like EA
EA for Cl is max in gr 7 and hence this compensates for lesser EN of Cl than F
coming to Br, the other factors that affect bond strength is responsible here too, and the other factor again is its EA. additionally its dissociation energy also comes into picture here
hope that clears u
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 4 Apr 2008 20:24:46 IST
|
|
|
can someone pls post the exact ans
|
all the best ... |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 4 Apr 2008 20:24:47 IST
|
|
|
excuse me dream but i fail to understand what reason you are implying! its clear that the reason is interelectronic repulsion
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 4 Apr 2008 20:25:15 IST
|
|
|
sandeep according to ur explanation ,
F-F has lesser size so it is closer to nucleus and hence must have higher bond energy
but the case in here is contrary to what u r saying
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 4 Apr 2008 20:25:40 IST
|
|
|
@ arpan : Im pretty sure that the answer is small size of F and thereby the larger interelectronic repulsion between two F's ens therefore smaller bond disassociation energy
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 4 Apr 2008 20:28:03 IST
|
|
|
well yes interelectronic repulsion is also a part of explanation which i forgot to mention
but the effect of interelectonic repulsion is not the exact xplanation
the exact xplanation involves all the points that i have covered in my previous post
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
|
|