| Author |
Message |
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 11 Jul 2008 23:08:58 IST
|
|
|
how Titanium can have greater covalent radius than calcium?
|
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 11 Jul 2008 23:18:33 IST
|
|
|
No,the covalent radius of calcium is bigger than that of titannium covalent radius of Ca=174 pm covalent radius of Ti=136 pm
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 11 Jul 2008 23:23:18 IST
|
|
|
ya but in EAMCET 05 paper he asked to arrange in ascending order of covalent radius of titanium,calcium nd scandium. he gave ans as Titanium,calcium nd scandium
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 11 Jul 2008 23:23:36 IST
|
|
|
sry 4 my wrong question above...
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 11 Jul 2008 23:25:42 IST
|
|
|
The key might be wrong just like it happened this year
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 11 Jul 2008 23:27:33 IST
|
|
|
okay thanx then...
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
|
|