hey,i got it on net
This is refinement of the technique of integration by parts. It is a labour saving device designed to cope with the situation where a simple-minded approach would leave us integrating by parts many times over before reaching an answer.
Example 9..1 Evaluate
x6ex dx.
Solution x6 is a function that simplifies on differentiation, ex is a function we can integrate in our heads, and so we use integration by parts.
Let
u = ex and
v = x6. Then
u dx = ex and
v' = 6x5. And so
 | = x6ex - 6x5ex dx | |
| | = e - 6 x5ex dx | |
It is an improvement, since we have an integral involving a lower power of x, but we are still a long way from the answer. What we must do next is use parts again. This will get us down to
x4ex dx. Then again to get down to x3ex. And so on. We shall reach an answer, but it is going to take time, time spent doing a lot of repetitive processes. What a reduction formula does is take the work out of the repeats. Instead of doing lots of integrations by parts, we shall do one, with an n in place of the 6. This will give us a formula which we can then use over and over with different values for n.
Let n be a positive integer, and let
In =
xnex d
x Integrate by parts with u = ex and v = xn. The result is
This is what is meant by a reduction formula. It gives In in terms of a simpler integral of the same type (In-1). Now let us use it on our earlier problem, which was to calculate I6.
(
*) with
n = 6 gives
I6 = e - 6I5. Now use it again with
n = 5 to get
I5 = e - 5I4 and substitute to get
I6 = e - 6I5 = e - 6(e - 5I4) = - 5e + 30I4
Now use the formula again, but with n = 4. Substitute once more, and then keep going in the same sort of way. | I6 | = - 5e + 30I4 | |
| | = - 5e + 30(e - 4I3) | |
| | = 25e - 120I3 | |
| | = 25e - 120(e - 3I2) | |
| | = - 95e + 360I2 | |
| | = - 95e + 360(e - 2I1) | |
| | = 265e - 720I1 | |
| | = 265e - 720(e - I0) | |
At that point we have to pause, because our formula was only valid for n > 0 and we are now down to n = 0. However, I0 is an integral we need no help with. I0 =
ex dx = e - 1. Therefore I6 = 265e - 720e + 720(e - 1) = 265e - 720
Example 9..2 Let
In =
sinnx dx where
n is an integer
2. Find a reduction formula for
In, and then use it to calculate
sin6x dx.
Solution With all these questions we use integration by parts, and the aim is to recover an integral of the same shape but with a smaller n.
The largest section of the integrand that we can integrate in our heads is sin x. So set u = sin x and v = sinn-1x (the bit that is left after we have removed u).
u d
x = - cos
x ,

= (
n - 1)sin
n-2x cos
x Therefore | In | = - sinn-1cos x - (n - 1)sinn-2x cos x(- cos x) dx | |
| | = - sinn-1cos x + (n - 1) sinn-2x cos2x dx | |
| | = - sinn-1cos x + (n - 1) sinn-2x(1 - sin2x) dx | |
| | = - sinn-1cos x + (n - 1) sinn-2x - sinnx dx | |
| | = - sinn-1cos x + (n - 1) sinn-2x dx - sinnx dx![$\displaystyle \left.\vphantom{\int\sin^{n-2}x dx-\int\sin^nx dx}\right]$](http://www.maths.abdn.ac.uk/%7Eigc/tch/eg1006/notes/img521.gif) | |
| | = - sinn-1x cos x + (n - 1) In-2 - In![$\displaystyle \left.\vphantom{I_{n-2}-I_n}\right]$](http://www.maths.abdn.ac.uk/%7Eigc/tch/eg1006/notes/img523.gif) | |
Taking all the In terms on to the left we get nIn = - sinn-1x cos x + (n - 1)In-2
To use this on a definite integral we just put in the limits. So if we had that
In =
sinnx dx, the formula would become
| nIn | = -sinn-1x cos x + (n - 1)In-2 | |
| | = (n - 1)In-2 provided n 2 | |
Repeated application of this formula will bring you down to I1 =
sin x dx or I0 =
dx, both of which you can do without difficulty. For example, with the definite integral and n = 6, we have
and since
dx =
, this leads to Reduction formulas for
cosnx dx and
xneax dx are to be found in your handbook. Others that are sometimes useful are 
sin
mx cos
nx d
x =

+


sin
mx cos
n-2x d
x and 
sin
mx cos
nx d
x = -

+


sin
m-2x cos
nx d
x Faced with an integral such as
sin8x cos4x dx you use the first of these to bring down the powers of cos x and the second to bring down those of sin x.