| Author |
Message |
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 1 May 2008 06:30:51 IST
|
|
|
HOW THE HOLE GETS LARGER? THE SOLUTION READS :comparatively,the expansion of the hole is more than its contraction . WHY the expansion is only outwards,why it cannot be inwards to make the hole smaller?
|
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 1 May 2008 07:47:36 IST
|
|
|
look at da edge of the hole...now due to uniform heatin the edje expand as the metal expands due to xpansion ....simple ...got it
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 1 May 2008 07:53:47 IST
|
|
|
Heating means giving energy that is the electrons will have more kinetic energy and would try to separate as much as possible from each other , hence the expansion occurs and not the contraction
|
JEE and OLYMPIA INFINATUM
http://iit-redefined.theforum.name/index.php
|
this reply: 10 points
(with 2 
in 2 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 1 May 2008 07:58:50 IST
|
|
|
IF THE EDGE EXPANDS ,THEN THE HOLE WILL BECOME SMALLER I think u want 2 say if the outer edge will expand outwards,then the inner edge will also expand outwards only by that much. but how is that possible, there will be no relative apparent expansion.
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 1 May 2008 08:02:36 IST
|
|
|
i just don't want about any K.E OR CONTRACTION . I JUST WANT THAT WHY THE EXPANSION IS OUTWARDS NOT INWARDS?
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 1 May 2008 08:09:21 IST
|
|
|
simple consider the inner hole now if it expands inwards then circumference decreases which means distance between adjacent molecules on heating decreases which is not possible
|

|
this reply: 2 points
(with 0 
in 1 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 1 May 2008 08:10:32 IST
|
|
|
The expansion, for me must be both sides...inwards as well as outwards...
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 1 May 2008 08:17:24 IST
Accepted Answer [?]
|
|
|
see if hole expands inwards distance between adjacent point has decreased which is not possible
|

|
this reply: 5 points
(with 1 
in 1 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 1 May 2008 18:37:53 IST
|
|
|
Forget everything else, the answer is very simple and straight When you heat it, the disc expands, but the relative dimensions of the hole and the disc remain unaltered. Put in better words, the ring after heating would just look like a magnified image of the original one The disc, as well as the hole, is magnified I guess you get my poing
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 2 May 2008 06:31:21 IST
|
|
|
answering 2 sagarvaze if the inner hole expands inwards,then how can u be so sure that the circumference decreases,it can increase expanding outward as well therby increasing the gap between adjacent molecules which is possible. I PARTIALLY AGREE WITH V.SABARISH. FINALLY PLEASE TELL ME WHETHER THIS STATEMENT IS CORRECT:the circular hole becomes smaller(shrinks)& the circumference becomes larger. I want 2 knw whether expansion is unidirectional or polydirectional? eg :if a 1m^3 cubical body is heated uniformly & suppose it expands by 6m, then expansion is 1m on all the6 sides or 3m & 3m in 2 opp.sides or 2m in one side & 4m in another side or 1m in one side& 5m on another or 2,2,2 or 3,2,1 or..........etc.
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 2 May 2008 06:40:09 IST
|
|
|
yes thank u very much sagarvaze 4 ur diagram. now, i understand everything....the hole can never become smaller.....as the k.e increases,the molecules will try to b far apart which is not possible between 2 adjacent molecules placed radially or along the circumference of small concentric circles near the hole.
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 2 May 2008 07:06:28 IST
|
|
|
About the statement you've made... there isn't much clarity... "the circular hole becomes smaller(shrinks)& the circumference becomes larger." smaller w.r.t what? smaller w.r.t its previous size, or its size relative to the disc?? If it's w.r.t its previous size, it may expand or shrink, depending on heating or cooling ... but relative to the disc, it's size remains unaltered
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 2 May 2008 07:36:19 IST
|
|
|
thanks sabarish for ur idea of w.r.t ..... i was asking w.r.t disc. RELATIVE 2 DISC ,ITS SIZE REMAINS UNALTERED, do u want 2 say that as much the inner hole expands outwards ,the outer circumference will expand outwards by that much only.Then there will be no relative expansion w.r.t. disc.
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
|
|