physics chemistry maths science forums
become expert I help I sign up I login
refer a friend - earn nickels!!   
 advanced
 
Home
Ask & Discuss Questions
Study Material
Experts Zone
Hang Out!

Ask & Discuss Questions with Community & Experts

Moderation Team
 90 chars left    advanced
Ask iit jee aieee pet cbse icse state board community Community Discussion Question: D C Pandey Q frm rotational motion 2
Forum Index -> Mechanics like the article? email it to a friend.  
Author Message
ramyani (2390)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 404  [589 rates]

ramyani's Avatar

total posts: 1953    
offline Offline


Plz help me.

Q. Two particles each of mass m and speed v, travel in opposite directions along parallel lines separated by a distance d. Show that the vector angular momentum of this system of particles is the same about any point taken as origin.


( Intro ex 9.3 of D C Pandey, volI, page 20 )


Plz give a detailed soln.


it is not important where u stand, but in which direction u are moving
    
arpan1 (665)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 105  bad job dude!! I dont approve of this answer! 1  [177 rates]

arpan1's Avatar

total posts: 658    
offline Offline
here goes the solution

let us assume that one particle moves on the line y= mx + c

then as per ques, other particle moves along the line y = mx + d

then

angular momentum of first particle about origin= mvc / ( 1 + m2 )

angular momentum of second particle about origin = mvd / ( 1 + m2 )


clearly they are not equal






rate me

all the best ...
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
karthik2007 (3355)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 591  [791 rates]

karthik2007's Avatar

total posts: 2588    
offline Offline
@arpan - the two lines that you have taken are not parallel. They are as shown by me in the figure.


Will nip in at times to solve problems :)
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
madman (239)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 33  [70 rates]

madman's Avatar

total posts: 486    
offline Offline
@arpan
parallel lines havent got opposite slopes
here is my solution
let the point be (x,y)
angular momentum of first particle = mvr1sin@ = mvp
angular momentum of second particle = mvr2sin@ = mvq
net angular momentum ( the angular momenta are in the same direction) = mvp+mvq =mvd (constant and independent of x and y)
you can also consider a point outside the lines
but in that case you will have to subtract them because they will be in opposite directions

science-
the most fundamental
the most eternal
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
madman (239)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 33  [70 rates]

madman's Avatar

total posts: 486    
offline Offline
Re:D C Pandey Q frm rotational motion 2


science-
the most fundamental
the most eternal
 this reply: 5 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 1 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
anchitsaini (4290)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 784  [969 rates]

anchitsaini's Avatar

total posts: 1209    
offline Offline
\mbox{The slope of the lines are m }\\ \\ \mbox{Let the equations of lines be - }\\ \\ y = mx + f\\ \\ y = mx + g\\ \\ d = \frac{f - g}{\sqrt{m^2 + 1}}\\ \\ \mbox{Let the point be h,k from which ang momentum is to be calculated }\\ \\ L_1 = mvr_1\\ \\ =mv\frac{mh - k + f}{m^2 + 1} \\ \\ \mbox{similarly }\\ \\ L_2 = mv\frac{mh - k + g}{m^2 + 1}\\ \\ \mbox{Since they are moving in opposite directions,net ang momentum = }\\ \\ L = L_1 - L_2 \\ \\ =\frac{mv}{\sqrt(m^2 + 1} * (mh - k + f - (mh - k + g))\\ \\ =\frac{mv(f-g)}{\sqrt(m^2 + 1}\\ \\ =mvd \mbox{ which is constant }

Impossible To be Impossible is Impossible
 this reply: 15 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 3 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
arpan1 (665)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 105  bad job dude!! I dont approve of this answer! 1  [177 rates]

arpan1's Avatar

total posts: 658    
offline Offline
@ madman and kartik


sorry, it was a typo . i hav corrected it (check it)

btw, madman why hav u specified by taking a point (x,y) and what is wrong  with my solution



all the best ...
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
madman (239)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 33  [70 rates]

madman's Avatar

total posts: 486    
offline Offline
@arpan
because i wanted to show that the angular momentum is the same irrespective of the point and x and y are variables
by origin they sont mean the point 0,0 but the point about which angular momentum is calculated

science-
the most fundamental
the most eternal
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
arpan1 (665)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 105  bad job dude!! I dont approve of this answer! 1  [177 rates]

arpan1's Avatar

total posts: 658    
offline Offline
see taking (0,0) or any other point hardly matters

u should get the correct ans

so what is wrong in my solution ????

all the best ...
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
anchitsaini (4290)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 784  [969 rates]

anchitsaini's Avatar

total posts: 1209    
offline Offline
arey yaar
how does it "hardly matters"
you should get the correct answer but it would not be the correct proof
You have not read the qn properly
First of all it asks for angular momentum of the system and not of individual particles
Secondly it asks for angular momentum about any point which can be considered as origin but may not be 0,0

Impossible To be Impossible is Impossible
 this reply: 5 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 1 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
arpan1 (665)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 105  bad job dude!! I dont approve of this answer! 1  [177 rates]

arpan1's Avatar

total posts: 658    
offline Offline
thanks achit for ur reply

i do know that i am simplifying the proof by considering (0,0) than generalising it ...

but anyways it would yield the same ans

as for the angular momentum of the system , i hope it would b the addition of the angular momentum of the individual particles

can u state me where is wrong in my proof apart from the simplification

all the best ...
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
feynmann (2093)

Forum Expert Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 379  [478 rates]

feynmann's Avatar

total posts: 776    
offline Offline

I think the vector approach would be more simple to understand .


Suppose , wrt any origin chosen , the P.V. of the first and second particles be r1 and r2 .


Given that r1-r2= + a .............( 1) ( a is a scalar which depends on time ) ( p and -p their respective momentum )


Now denote the angular momentum of any particle by L


So , L1= r1 X p


L2= r2 X( -p) )


So L1+ L2 = ( r1-r2) X p = ( d+ a p ) Xp = d Xp = a constant ( independent of time )

 this reply: 5 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 1 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
 
Forum Index -> Mechanics
Go to:   

Top Offers for goIITians
Correspondence Courses
Brilliant Tutorials
Narayana Institute
Aakash Institute
Classroom/Crash Courses
Narayana - Kota , Delhi , Others
Brilliant Tutorials - Class , Crash
Aakash Institute - Medical , Engg
Online Test Series
Brilliant Tutorials
Narayana Institute
Aakash Institute
Mahesh Tutorials
AMITY      Sri Chaitanya