| Author |
Message |
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 31 Dec 2007 15:32:59 IST
|
|
|
In the following figure the surface is frictionless... We have to apply the conservation of mechanical energy principle...is the gravitational force an internal force or external force.....] if it is an external than we can conserve energy because it is balanced by the normal reaction force...... plz clear the doubt
|
<TABLE CELLSPACING="1" CELLPADDING="1" BORDER="0">
<TR><TD>
          
<DIV ALIGN="right">Glitter Graphics</DIV></TD></TR></TABLE>
|
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 31 Dec 2007 15:42:12 IST
|
|
|
Yes you can, note that N does not do any work, because it is always normal to the surface, while mg is not always normal to the surface, hence it will do a positive magnitude of work.
|
Will nip in at times to solve problems :)
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 31 Dec 2007 15:46:51 IST
|
|
|
look... u have nothing to do wid normal reaction here...it will always be balanced...( dimensions...of curved path aren't given)...the main thing is..no non-conservative force is acting on the system..thus.. its total energy is not altered...at all..
|
Diamonds r formed under greatest pressures..
so r the champs.
Kriteesh..
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 31 Dec 2007 20:35:35 IST
|
|
|
u both are right kartik and decoder...but it is still not clear to me that the gravitational force is external or internal to our system..
|
<TABLE CELLSPACING="1" CELLPADDING="1" BORDER="0">
<TR><TD>
          
<DIV ALIGN="right">Glitter Graphics</DIV></TD></TR></TABLE>
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 1 Jan 2008 13:16:07 IST
|
|
|
anybody please..
|
<TABLE CELLSPACING="1" CELLPADDING="1" BORDER="0">
<TR><TD>
          
<DIV ALIGN="right">Glitter Graphics</DIV></TD></TR></TABLE>
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 1 Jan 2008 14:38:31 IST
|
|
|
if we take earth + body as a system g.f. is internal force. use this and write the relation. as acc. of earth is neglible there is no change in its kinectic energy. so finally you will get same answer.
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 1 Jan 2008 15:22:13 IST
|
|
|
Here's a simple way to conserve energy:
Now, consider a body moving down a rough inclined plane. Its initial energy at the top was mgh, final energy at the bottom is 1/2mv^2.. but it will be less than mgh (coz of friction), right? here, friction is the culprit, so while conserving energy, simply add work done by friction to the final KE to compensate. mgh = 1/2mv^2 + f.S
do the same for other forces... make sure you find out where they are to be added
|
Will nip in at times to solve problems :)
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 1 Jan 2008 16:25:21 IST
|
|
|
you have indirectly told the work energy theorm......mine ques is this...... wE CAN TALE IN THE ABOVE FIGURE GRAVITATIONAL POTENTIAL ENERGY ZERO AT ANY POINT...RIGHT...SO IN THAT CASE WILL mg BE AN INTERNAL OR EXTERNAL FORCE....
|
<TABLE CELLSPACING="1" CELLPADDING="1" BORDER="0">
<TR><TD>
          
<DIV ALIGN="right">Glitter Graphics</DIV></TD></TR></TABLE>
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 1 Jan 2008 16:32:45 IST
|
|
|
Dude, force due to gravity is external here
|
Will nip in at times to solve problems :)
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 1 Jan 2008 21:31:21 IST
|
|
|
so in this case gravity did the workk.. and you must hav read that if the external forces are present we can`t conserve mechanical energy??
|
<TABLE CELLSPACING="1" CELLPADDING="1" BORDER="0">
<TR><TD>
          
<DIV ALIGN="right">Glitter Graphics</DIV></TD></TR></TABLE>
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 1 Jan 2008 21:36:11 IST
|
|
|
dude, here, we are using the work energy theorem!!!
generally, we call it as conservation of energy in cases where only gravity acts
|
Will nip in at times to solve problems :)
|
this reply: 2 points
(with 0 
in 1 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 1 Jan 2008 21:41:24 IST
|
|
|
simple yaar !!! you dont need to think that gravity is external or internal just remember the work energy theoram says the work done by all the forces on a system "(internal or external ;conservative or non conservative )" is equal to the change in kinetic energy of the system
|
you are in the competition to beat the competition
you work hard for a desired result |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 1 Jan 2008 21:42:24 IST
|
|
|
dont mess up you mind with conservation of energy just always go the basics or you will be always confused
|
you are in the competition to beat the competition
you work hard for a desired result |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 1 Jan 2008 22:55:57 IST
|
|
|