physics chemistry maths science forums
become expert I help I sign up I login
refer a friend - earn nickels!!   
 advanced
 
Home
Ask & Discuss Questions
Study Material
Experts Zone
Hang Out!

Ask & Discuss Questions with Community & Experts

Moderation Team
 90 chars left    advanced
Ask iit jee aieee pet cbse icse state board experts Expert Question: Gravitation
Forum Index -> Mechanics like the article? email it to a friend.  
Author Message
cool_anu5 (0)

New kid on the Block

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 0  [0 rates]

cool_anu5's Avatar

total posts: 1    
offline Offline
Two bodies of masses m1 and m2 are initially at rest at infinite distance apart. Thay are then allowed to move towards each other under mutual gravitational attraction. What is their relative velocity of approach at a separation distance r between them?
    
djdylan2000 (161)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 23  [46 rates]

djdylan2000's Avatar

total posts: 529    
offline Offline
I think 0. If they are at infinite distance, they wont come together under mutual gravitation force.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Dylan João Colaço .xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
Decoder (331)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 51  [89 rates]

Decoder's Avatar

total posts: 344    
offline Offline
look force is GmM / R^2..
so potential enery is -GmM/R..at a distance R b/w them..

now velocitty gained by m1..till then by WET..
is root(Gm2/R)..
similarly root(Gm1/R) for m2.....

add them u get relative velocvity of approach..



Diamonds r formed under greatest pressures..
so r the champs.


Kriteesh..


 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
elastiboysai (2327)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 421  [532 rates]

elastiboysai's Avatar

total posts: 573    
offline Offline
\text{Let v be velocity of approach}\\ \text{Increase in kinetic energy=decrease in potential energy}\\ \frac{1}{2}\mu\cdot v_r^2=\frac{Gm_1m_2}{r}\\ v_r=\sqrt\frac{2G\cdot(m_1+m_2)}{r}\\ \\ Here \mu=\frac{m_1\cdot m_2}{m_1+m_2} \\ \text{represents the reduced mass of the system}\\ \text{this equation can be obtained in a genl case by working}\\ \text{in the center of mass frame}
 this reply: 15 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 3 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
ayshwarya (241)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 45  [53 rates]

ayshwarya's Avatar

total posts: 519    
offline Offline
hey elastiboysai can u plz say how v vud get mu=m1.m2/m1+m2
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
anchitsaini (4280)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 782  [967 rates]

anchitsaini's Avatar

total posts: 1201    
offline Offline
wait i'll post the proof

Impossible To be Impossible is Impossible
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
anchitsaini (4280)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 782  [967 rates]

anchitsaini's Avatar

total posts: 1201    
offline Offline
v1 = velocity of m1
v2 = velocity of m2

conserving momentum--

m1 v1 = m2 v2              -----------1

conserving energy --

m1 v1 2 / 2    +  m2 v2 2 / 2 = Gm1 m2 / r     ---------2

putting value of v2 from 1 in 2 we get --

v1 2 ( m1 + m2) / m2 = 2G m2 / r

v1 = m2  [ 2G / (m1 + m2) r ]

similarly putting value of v1 from 1 in 2 we get --

v2 = m1 [ 2G / (m1 + m2) r ]

relative velocity = v1 + v2 since they are in opposite directions
v r = [ 2G / (m1 + m2) r ] * (m1 + m2)
  
    = [ 2G (m1 + m2) / r ]

Impossible To be Impossible is Impossible
 this reply: 12 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 3 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
anandghegde (1697)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 299  [400 rates]

anandghegde's Avatar

total posts: 1072    
offline Offline
\text{Conserve Energy}\\ \\ \frac{G.m_1.m_2}{r^2} = \frac{1}{2}m_1v_1^2 + \frac{1}{2}m_2v_2^2

\text{Conserve momentum}\\ \\ m_1v_1 = m_2v_2

now solve and get v_1+v_2 (relative velocity of approach)

"I a universe of atoms.......an atom in the universe"
 this reply: 2 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 1 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
anandghegde (1697)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 299  [400 rates]

anandghegde's Avatar

total posts: 1072    
offline Offline
oh sorry anchit...dint see you post.

"I a universe of atoms.......an atom in the universe"
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
elastiboysai (2327)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 421  [532 rates]

elastiboysai's Avatar

total posts: 573    
offline Offline
Wait
Posting the proof for reduced mass .
Im posting it in a different context btw
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
elastiboysai (2327)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 421  [532 rates]

elastiboysai's Avatar

total posts: 573    
offline Offline
Consider 2 blocs m1 and m2 attached to each other  by a massless spring
of force constant k.
Supposer l is the free length of spring,
consider ur system 2 b placed on x axis, with 1 mass m2 at origin.
if m1 and m2 are displaced and have coordinates by x1 and x2
extension of spring= x =(x1-x2)-l --->1
now
m1d2x1/dt2 =-kx
m2d2x2/dt2 =kx
from the abov 2,

m1m2d2(x1-x2)/dt2=-kx(m1+m2)
m1m2/(m1+m2)--=y say
differentiating 1 twice we get
yd2x/dt2=-kx
so
d2x/dt2= -k/y *x
here y plays the role of mass.
We can straightaway use d standard equations by treating y as the mass.

I agree my proof is not rigorous.
Reduced mass is just a technique .
If no external force acts on the system and only internal conservative forces are in play,
mechanical energy of the system will remain conserved.
in such cases , u cn play wid reduced mass

The abov problem is such an example
To the system of 2 masses, gravitational force between them is an internal conservative froce n u can use d same technique..
 this reply: 10 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 2 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
elastiboysai (2327)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 421  [532 rates]

elastiboysai's Avatar

total posts: 573    
offline Offline
my apologies for the bad drawing

 this reply: 5 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 1 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
edison (4425)

Forum Expert Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 781  [1041 rates]

edison's Avatar

total posts: 2269    
offline Offline
In such problems, apply conservation of energy and momentum both

1) As here gravitational potential energy is getting converted into kinetic energy of the two bodies

2) Also the momentum is conserved and total momentum throughout the motion of the two bodies = 0
 
Now solve the two equations formulated as above, it will be linear equations in two variables, and its solution gives desired results.

The most incomprehensible thing about the world is that it is

at all comprehensible.
 this reply: 2 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 1 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
 
Forum Index -> Mechanics
Go to: