| Author |
Message |
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 3 Jan 2008 20:55:39 IST
|
|
|
in this question there will be two values of time, bcos of a quadratic equation, wat does it mean? a particle starts with velocity of 200cm/s and moves in a straight line with a retardation of 10cm/s2,find the time it takes to describe 1500cm.
|
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 3 Jan 2008 21:00:44 IST
|
|
|
Use S = ut + 0.5at2
here, S = 1500, u = 200, a = -10.
Now you will get a quadratic equation in t, hence two values of time... reject the negative value
|
Will nip in at times to solve problems :)
|
this reply: 2 points
(with 0 
in 1 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 3 Jan 2008 21:10:18 IST
|
|
|
but both values r positive
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 3 Jan 2008 21:16:59 IST
|
|
|
we know V(i) = 200cm/sec, a = 10cm/sec and s = 1500cm also, s = V(i)t + (1/2)a(t^2) so we get, 1500 = 200t + 5(t^2) (t^2) + 40t - 300 = 0 t = [-40 [2 ] 1600 + 1200]2 t = 6.45sec here we also get a negtive value for time which is meaninless, ie, it has no physical significance. so we reject it and accept the +ve value only. i hope this solves ur query
|
S.Raghudevan
Everything that's happening as it should be happening, because of the simple fact that it's supposed to be happening just as it is happening. |
this reply: 7 points
(with 1 
in 2 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 3 Jan 2008 21:23:00 IST
|
|
|
hey, this is retardation. so the equation is: 1500=200t-5t2 so t2-40t+300=0
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 3 Jan 2008 21:29:59 IST
|
|
|
ya so one root is coming positive and the odr negative..ur ansrs are 30secs and -10secs.....neglect the scnd one.....
|
PROGRESS ISN'T MADE BY EARLY RISERS OR HARD WORKERS, BUT BY LAZY PEOPLE TRYING TO FIND EASIER WAY TO DO THE SAME.....SO BE LAZZZZYY!!!! |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 3 Jan 2008 21:42:06 IST
|
|
|
you will get two answers 10s and 30s .....here initial velocity=200cm/s and a=-10m/s ^2 a=v/ t if we substitute the value for t as 10m/s we get the correct value and the other one doesn't match the acceleration value given... hence chuck 30 s
|
<TABLE CELLSPACING="1" CELLPADDING="1" BORDER="0">
<TR><TD>
<DIV ALIGN="right">Glitter Graphics</DIV></TD></TR></TABLE> |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 3 Jan 2008 21:47:00 IST
|
|
|
yeah, sorry (t^2) - 40t + 300 = 0 t = [40 [2 ] 1600 - 1200]/2 t = [20 10] t = 30 sec or 10 sec we know that the body is under const deceleration of 10cm/sec, so in the first 10 sec itself, the body would have covered 1500cm in the positive direction, then it'll come to a stop, then due to the acc in the -ve direction, it'll start moving in the -ve direction with const acc of 10cm/sec, it takes the body 30sec to cover 1500cm in the -ve direction, first it would have covered 1500cm in the +ve direction, then stopped and then started moving in the -ve direction, it would have covered 1500cm again to reach the mean position and then moved onto 1500cm in the -ve direction, the total time taken for this is 30sec, the net displacement is -1500cm, if we sub, v = 200cm/sec, a = -10cm/sec^2 and t = 30 sec, we get this
|
S.Raghudevan
Everything that's happening as it should be happening, because of the simple fact that it's supposed to be happening just as it is happening. |
this reply: 2 points
(with 0 
in 1 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 3 Jan 2008 21:53:53 IST
|
|
|
dude iam not sure whether you are right...but as far as i know negative acceleration doesn't mean that it goes in the negative direction
|
<TABLE CELLSPACING="1" CELLPADDING="1" BORDER="0">
<TR><TD>
<DIV ALIGN="right">Glitter Graphics</DIV></TD></TR></TABLE> |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 3 Jan 2008 22:09:07 IST
|
|
|
-ve const acc means that there is some force that acts in the -ve direction on the body. this force will cause the body to first stop and then move on in the -ve direction. but the force has to be const, if the force is const , then the acc is also const(unless of coure we dont consider a variable mass system) :)
|
S.Raghudevan
Everything that's happening as it should be happening, because of the simple fact that it's supposed to be happening just as it is happening. |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 4 Jan 2008 00:28:31 IST
|
|
|
As the body slows down, it will cross 1500 cm distance at time=10 sec, stop after some distance, start to come back towards where it started from and cross the same location (which is at 1500cm from starting point) at time=30 sec but with velocity in the opposite direction.
|
http://14-69-8.blogspot.com
My blog |
this reply: 2 points
(with 0 
in 1 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 4 Jan 2008 11:18:44 IST
|
|
|
but in da question it is give that it is retardation. does it mean that retardation and negative acceleration are same???
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 4 Jan 2008 11:34:39 IST
|
|
|
Yes they are same.
|
http://14-69-8.blogspot.com
My blog |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 4 Jan 2008 20:41:12 IST
|
|
|
yeah, retardation just means acc in the -ve direction, this is caused by some force, as the retardation is const, that force is too, so after it stops the body it will acc the body in the -ve direction
|
S.Raghudevan
Everything that's happening as it should be happening, because of the simple fact that it's supposed to be happening just as it is happening. |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 4 Jan 2008 20:44:04 IST
|
|
|