physics chemistry maths science forums
become expert I help I sign up I login
refer a friend - earn nickels!!   
 advanced
 
Home
Ask & Discuss Questions
Study Material
Experts Zone
Hang Out!

Ask & Discuss Questions with Community & Experts

Moderation Team
 90 chars left    advanced
Ask iit jee aieee pet cbse icse state board community Community Discussion Question: kinematics
Forum Index -> Mechanics like the article? email it to a friend.  
Author Message
luxmi (30)

Cool goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 6  [6 rates]

luxmi's Avatar

total posts: 50    
offline Offline
in this question there will be two values of time, bcos of a quadratic equation, wat does it mean?
 
a particle starts with velocity of 200cm/s and moves in a straight line with a retardation of 10cm/s2,find the time it takes to describe 1500cm.
    
karthik2007 (3349)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 591  [788 rates]

karthik2007's Avatar

total posts: 2585    
offline Offline
Use S = ut + 0.5at2

here, S = 1500, u = 200, a = -10.

Now you will get a quadratic equation in t, hence two values of time... reject the negative value

Will nip in at times to solve problems :)
 this reply: 2 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 1 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
luxmi (30)

Cool goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 6  [6 rates]

luxmi's Avatar

total posts: 50    
offline Offline
but both values r positive
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
Raghudevan (135)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 19  [39 rates]

Raghudevan's Avatar

total posts: 325    
offline Offline
we know V(i) = 200cm/sec, a = 10cm/sec and s = 1500cm
 
also, s = V(i)t + (1/2)a(t^2)
 
so we get,
 
1500 = 200t + 5(t^2)
 
 (t^2) + 40t - 300 = 0
 
 t = [-40  [2 ]1600 + 1200]2
 
 t = [-20  10[2 ]7]
 
 t = 6.45sec
 
here we also get a negtive value for time which is meaninless, ie, it has no physical significance. so we reject it and accept the +ve value only.
 
i hope this solves ur query
 

S.Raghudevan

Everything that's happening as it should be happening, because of the simple fact that it's supposed to be happening just as it is happening.
 this reply: 7 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 2 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
luxmi (30)

Cool goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 6  [6 rates]

luxmi's Avatar

total posts: 50    
offline Offline
hey, this is retardation. so the equation is:
1500=200t-5t2
so t2-40t+300=0
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
svj29 (1860)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 322  [447 rates]

svj29's Avatar

total posts: 721    
offline Offline
ya so one root is coming positive and the odr negative..ur ansrs are 30secs and -10secs.....neglect the scnd one.....

PROGRESS ISN'T MADE BY EARLY RISERS OR HARD WORKERS, BUT BY LAZY PEOPLE TRYING TO FIND EASIER WAY TO DO THE SAME.....SO BE LAZZZZYY!!!!
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
crack (380)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 64  [94 rates]

crack's Avatar

total posts: 316    
offline Offline
you will get two answers 10s and 30s .....here initial velocity=200cm/s and a=-10m/s ^2
a=v/ t
if we substitute the value for t as 10m/s we get the correct value and the other one doesn't match the acceleration value given...
hence chuck 30 s

<TABLE CELLSPACING="1" CELLPADDING="1" BORDER="0">
<TR><TD>


<DIV ALIGN="right">Glitter Graphics</DIV></TD></TR></TABLE>
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
Raghudevan (135)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 19  [39 rates]

Raghudevan's Avatar

total posts: 325    
offline Offline
yeah, sorry (t^2) - 40t + 300 = 0
 
 t = [40  [2 ]1600 - 1200]/2
 
 t = [20  10]
 
 t = 30 sec or 10 sec
 
we know that the body is under const deceleration of 10cm/sec, so in the first 10 sec itself, the body would have covered 1500cm in the positive direction, then it'll come to a stop, then due to the acc in the -ve direction, it'll start moving in the -ve direction with const acc of 10cm/sec, it takes the body 30sec to cover 1500cm in the -ve direction, first it would have covered 1500cm in the +ve direction, then stopped and then started moving in the -ve direction, it would have covered 1500cm again to reach the mean position and then moved onto 1500cm in the -ve direction, the total time taken for this is 30sec, the net displacement is -1500cm, if we sub,             v = 200cm/sec, a = -10cm/sec^2 and t = 30 sec, we get this
 

S.Raghudevan

Everything that's happening as it should be happening, because of the simple fact that it's supposed to be happening just as it is happening.
 this reply: 2 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 1 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
crack (380)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 64  [94 rates]

crack's Avatar

total posts: 316    
offline Offline
dude iam not sure whether you are right...but as far as i know negative acceleration doesn't mean that it goes in the negative direction

<TABLE CELLSPACING="1" CELLPADDING="1" BORDER="0">
<TR><TD>


<DIV ALIGN="right">Glitter Graphics</DIV></TD></TR></TABLE>
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
Raghudevan (135)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 19  [39 rates]

Raghudevan's Avatar

total posts: 325    
offline Offline
-ve const acc means that there is some force that acts in the -ve direction on the body. this force will cause the body to first stop and then move on in the -ve direction. but the force has to be const, if the force is const , then the acc is also const(unless of coure we dont consider a variable mass system) :)

S.Raghudevan

Everything that's happening as it should be happening, because of the simple fact that it's supposed to be happening just as it is happening.
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
rooney (889)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 151  bad job dude!! I dont approve of this answer! 1  [220 rates]

rooney's Avatar

total posts: 577    
offline Offline
As the body slows down, it will cross 1500 cm distance at time=10 sec, stop after some distance, start to come back towards where it started from and cross the same location (which is at 1500cm from starting point) at time=30 sec but with velocity in the opposite direction.

http://14-69-8.blogspot.com
My blog
 this reply: 2 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 1 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
luxmi (30)

Cool goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 6  [6 rates]

luxmi's Avatar

total posts: 50    
offline Offline
but in da question it is give that it is retardation. does it mean that retardation and negative acceleration are same???
 
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
rooney (889)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 151  bad job dude!! I dont approve of this answer! 1  [220 rates]

rooney's Avatar

total posts: 577    
offline Offline
Yes they are same.

http://14-69-8.blogspot.com
My blog
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
Raghudevan (135)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 19  [39 rates]

Raghudevan's Avatar

total posts: 325    
offline Offline
yeah, retardation just means acc in the -ve direction, this is caused by some force, as the retardation is const, that force is too, so after it stops the body it will acc the body in the -ve direction

S.Raghudevan

Everything that's happening as it should be happening, because of the simple fact that it's supposed to be happening just as it is happening.
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
madman (239)

Blazing goIITian