| Author |
Message |
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 4 Apr 2007 11:26:44 IST
|
|
|
Q--SHOULD WE USE ENERGY CONSERVATION OR FORCE EQUATION IN CASE OF SPRINGS? I HAD READ FROM INTERACTIVE PHYSICS(mtg) THAT ONE MUST USE ENERGY CONSERVATION FOR SPRINGS BECOZ ACCELERATION AT THE EXTREME POSITION IS NOT ZERO. BUT IN PROBLEMS OF H.C.VERMA IN SIMPLE HARMONIC MOTION AND A FEW OTHER CHAPTERS IF I USE THE ENERGY CONSERVATION I GET WRONG ANSWERS,HOWEVER IF I USES FORCE EQUATION I GET THE RIGHT ANSWER? PLEASE MAKE IT CLEAR WHERE I SHOULD USE ENERGY CONSERVATION AND WHERE FORCE EQUATION IN CASE OF A SPRING
|
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 4 Apr 2007 12:34:48 IST
|
|
|
hi.. as far as da problems on shm r concerned..! we shud actually u both..! energy conservation..n force eqns..1st apply energy conservation..n den convert da respect energy's into forces..label all da forces..actin on da body..n then convert into da respective SHM terms..n see if u get da answer/..!
n as far as da general spring problems r concerned..only energy conservation wud do the trik..!
if u find da ans convincin dont forget to rate me..!! cheers..!
|
MaYuR.......
ne TimE....ne WheR..!! |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 4 Apr 2007 15:29:44 IST
|
|
|
Force equation is a foolproof method.... But, by conservation of energy, you shld get your answer correctly... b'coz energy and force equation can be related to each by IInd or IIIrd kinematic eqn, where we can convert velocity in accln, vice-versa.... So,it doesn't matter, if you use either of them..... But, for special cases, it may differ.... If you are convinced, please don't forget to rate me..... Thanx
|
          
Animated Letters
|
this reply: 2 points
(with 0 
in 1 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 4 Apr 2007 16:03:45 IST
|
|
|
Both the methods are equally good and applicable in solving spring related problems. May be u are committing some fundamental mistake while solving such problems. You may post the solution by different methods for solving same problem in which you are encountering the different results, so that we can suggest you the lacunae, if any. Moreover chirag has rightly stated that both metnods converges to the same result and can be derived from the other.
|
The Scientist does not study nature because it is useful; he studies it because he delights in it, & he delights in it because it is beautiful. If nature were not beautiful, it would not be worth knowing, life would not be worth living. Ofcourse I do not here speak of that beauty that strikes the senses, the beauty of qualities & appearances; not that I undervalue such beauty, far from it, but it has nothing to do with science; I mean that profounder beauty which comes from the harmoniuos order of the parts, & which a pure intelligence can grasp. |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 5 Apr 2007 11:41:02 IST
|
|
|
I HAVE TRIED IT . U CAN UR SELF CONFIRM IT BY APPLYING THE 2 WAYS TO H C VERMA CHAPTER 8 Qno45 CHAPTER 29 Qno 51 AND MANY MORE
|
battles of life dont always go to the stronger or faster man
but sooner or later the man who wins
is the man who thinks "HE CAN" |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 5 Apr 2007 14:22:11 IST
|
|
|
force eq is valid only at equilibrium position!!! remember this therefore it is advised to use energy conservation!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 5 Apr 2007 14:35:06 IST
|
|
|
so energy conservation brings out the right ans in q45(since max disp is asked) there is no chapter29 in part 1 .are u talking bout part 2??? butREMEMBER FORCE eq is always valid only at EQUILIBRIUM POSITION!!!!!!!!!! thank u!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 7 Apr 2007 12:31:23 IST
|
|
|
It all depends on what you want to find. If it is force or acceleration or velocity or momentum.
My method is use force when to find acceleration. Use energy to find velocity.
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 11 Apr 2007 15:26:48 IST
|
|
|
ok guys try this simple question
A VERTICAL SPRING (spring constant k) HAS A MASS (m) ATTACHED TO IT AND THE SYSTEM IS IN EQLIBRM. FIND THE EXTENSION IN IT? SEE THE 2 CASES
mg=kx
OR mgx=(1/2)k(x^2)
and u get 2 diff ans??
plz explain
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 11 Apr 2007 17:13:15 IST
|
|
|
I think using energy conservation is a better option unless u dont learn to select a suitable reference frame. But once you are able to select a suitable frame both methods may be applied.
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 11 Apr 2007 18:19:57 IST
|
|
|
hey tabish we use mg=kx when we comprress or extend the spring very gently and the force works over it for a very short span as otherwise we use the potential energy as 1/2 kx^2 and not just kx^2 the basic reason is that when foce works for a large time interval then some of the e.p.e stored i s used up in the form of heat and we have only 1/2kx^2 left as e.p.e
if convinced plz rate me
|
there is no right way 2 do something wrong !!!!!!!! |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 11 Apr 2007 18:34:22 IST
|
|
|
Tabish, your energy equation is completely wrong. The concept behind this is that the total energy in an SHM remains constant. We write the total energy as the sum of potential energy and kinetic energy. For a horizontal spring: the total energy at any point = 0.5mv2 + 0.5kx2 Now, either you can follow the Interactive Physics rule of finding  directly, or you can differentiate this to be more formal. Since E = constant. dE/dt=0. or mv dv/dt + kx dx/dt = 0. Since dx/dt=v, d2x/dt2 + (k/m)x=0. Now 2=(k/m). or T=2*pi*  (m/k) . The method is similar for vertical springs. You have to take initial extension and the gravitational potential energy into account.
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
|
|