| Author |
Message |
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 28 Jul 2008 14:15:56 IST
|
|
|
This question is from JEE Screening 2005 (Physics)
A block of mass m is at rest under the action of force F against a wall. Which of the following is incorrect? Please see attached file for figure.
a) f = mg [f is frictional force]
b) F = N [where N is normal force]
c) F will not produce torque
d) N will not produce torque
The answer for this question is D. However, I don't fully understand how we can say that F will not produce torque. Under the condition of static equilibrium, all we know is that sum of torques around any line is 0. So, if we take the axis of rotation along centre of mass, then of course the torque by F and mg will be 0. But if we take axis of rotation to be lets say the uppe left corner of the block, then torque by F will not be zero.
When this question appeared in the screening exam, was it clearly mentioned to take the axis of rotation around the centre of mass?
Thanks,
Abhay.

|
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 28 Jul 2008 22:33:06 IST
|
|
|
since the dir. of the frictional force=mg is upward for the block to be in eqlm.
also in stable eqlm the net force=0
therefore F=N
since in the fig the F is acting in the line of C.M. so torque by it =0
but N will produce a torque to balance the torque by the frictional force
so N will also shift its position such that it produce anticlockwise torque to balance the clockwise torque by the frictional force
hope u got it.
|
this reply: 5 points
(with 1 
in 1 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 29 Jul 2008 07:38:26 IST
|
|
|
Animal, like I said before, I already know what you've said, but this solution only make sense when you take the axis of rotation to be through the centre of mass.
It is easy to see that that F=N and f=mg
The condition of static equilibrium is that the sum of torques around any line is 0 (not just centre of mass). So in order for this solution to make sense, the axis of rotation should have been clearly specified...makes sense?
For example, take the axis of rotation to be going through the upper left corner of the cubical block moving in and out of the plane. In this case, the torque by f will be 0 and the other forces will have torques that sum to 0. Torque by F will not be 0 here.
Can anyone understand what I'm saying here?? Was the axis of rotation specified when this problem appeared in JEE.
Thanks,
Abhay.
|
this reply: 2 points
(with 0 
in 1 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 30 Jul 2008 15:02:50 IST
|
|
|
Wanted to request if anyone could answer my query above?
Thanks.
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 30 Jul 2008 15:54:39 IST
|
|
|
In this case I think that friction is not coming fully on the side of wall.
mg/2 will come there and remaining mg/2 will come at the surface of application of force F ,isn't it?
Then only moment due to weight(mga) will be balanced by moment due to friction at F(mg/2*2a) when we take moments wrt the wall.
Even now I am not sure about the answer 'D'. It appears to be wrong!
|
SLOW AND STEADY WINS THE RACE |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 31 Jul 2008 19:23:25 IST
|
|
|
Once again, just wanted to request if anyone could solve my query above. I think it is essential that someone should be able to explain the answer to a question that appeared on an actual JEE exam. Please take into consideration what I mentioned above when posting the reply. This is not some random question but a question that is very relevant to JEE practice. Any help is really appreciated.
Can any of the forum experts answer this? Anyone?
Thanks.
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 2 Aug 2008 11:03:52 IST
|
|
|
i will solve this problem it require depth will post the solution soon
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 4 Aug 2008 20:13:54 IST
|
|
|
Hey Folks,
Just wanted to push this question again (please see al the posts above).
Any help would be great.
Thanks.
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 4 Aug 2008 21:42:36 IST
|
|
|
SEE DUDE IT COMES FROM 3 DIMNSIONAL VIEW IN 3 DIMENSIONS F WILL PRODUCE TOURQUE SO U CAN SAY ANYTHING
|
From shadows a light shall spring
Renewed shall be blade that's broken
The crown less again shall be king.
MY BLOG
http://my.opera.com/vu2rje/blog/ |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 5 Aug 2008 09:34:10 IST
|
|
|
Hey Varun,
Torque produced by a force depends on the line of rotation. So as I said previously, if you take the axis of rotation to be through the centre of mass, only then the given solution makes sense.
The answer given above is same as the one posted on the solutions given by Fiitjee, Narayana or Arihant previous year's solutions.
My question is, if we are just supposed to assume what axis of rotation to take. Any hints or suggestions on this?
I'm surprised none of the forum experts have been able to comment on this. Common guys, have a dig at this.
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
|
|