|
|
|
|
|

| Author |
Message |
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 15 Mar 2007 08:43:52 IST
|
|
|
What will b the value of g if bob of simple pendulum is made to oscillate in some fluid of density d? What will be the time period of a simple pendulum if length of the pendulum is comparable to radius of the earth? Expian clearly
|
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 16 Mar 2007 20:34:03 IST
|
|
|
Problem) What will b the value of g if bob of simple pendulum is made to oscillate in some fluid of density d? Solution) If density of bob material is = d1 Also if volume of the bob = V Density of fluid in which simple pendulum is oscillating = d2 Then the buoyancy force due to fluid on the bob = Fb = V d2g (against gravity) So, Resultant Force on the bob is given by = Gravitaional force - Buoyancy force Or Resultant force on the bob = V d1 g - V d2g If effective acceleration due to gravity = g' then above equation can be written as V d1g' = V d1 g - V d2g or, g' = (d1 - d2) g / d1
|
The Scientist does not study nature because it is useful; he studies it because he delights in it, & he delights in it because it is beautiful. If nature were not beautiful, it would not be worth knowing, life would not be worth living. Ofcourse I do not here speak of that beauty that strikes the senses, the beauty of qualities & appearances; not that I undervalue such beauty, far from it, but it has nothing to do with science; I mean that profounder beauty which comes from the harmoniuos order of the parts, & which a pure intelligence can grasp. |
this reply: 5 points
(with 1 
in 1 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 16 Mar 2007 20:37:41 IST
|
|
|
So Time period of the simple pendulum in the fluid is given by
T = 2 pi ( l / g' )^1/2
where g' is given by above mentioned expression i.e.
g' = (d1 g - d2g) / d1
|
The Scientist does not study nature because it is useful; he studies it because he delights in it, & he delights in it because it is beautiful. If nature were not beautiful, it would not be worth knowing, life would not be worth living. Ofcourse I do not here speak of that beauty that strikes the senses, the beauty of qualities & appearances; not that I undervalue such beauty, far from it, but it has nothing to do with science; I mean that profounder beauty which comes from the harmoniuos order of the parts, & which a pure intelligence can grasp. |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 16 Mar 2007 20:40:23 IST
|
|
|
Just one question in a single post.
For Another one you are requested to mail as a separate post
|
The Scientist does not study nature because it is useful; he studies it because he delights in it, & he delights in it because it is beautiful. If nature were not beautiful, it would not be worth knowing, life would not be worth living. Ofcourse I do not here speak of that beauty that strikes the senses, the beauty of qualities & appearances; not that I undervalue such beauty, far from it, but it has nothing to do with science; I mean that profounder beauty which comes from the harmoniuos order of the parts, & which a pure intelligence can grasp. |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|