| Author |
Message |
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 7 Feb 2008 19:11:11 IST
|
|
|
There is a system with two rollers each of mass M and radius r,linked with a chain of mass M and length l,crawls with a constant speed V as shown.The KE of the system is equal to (r<<<l)
a)3MV^2 b)2MV^2 c)MV^2 d)1.5MV^2
|
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 7 Feb 2008 19:38:40 IST
|
|
|
the total ke of the system is given by 1/2 Mv^2 +1/2 Mv^2 + 1/2Mv^2 = 1.5Mv^2 the first two 1/2 Mv^2 is for the two spheres and the third one for the chain
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 7 Feb 2008 19:54:33 IST
|
|
|
use ke =1/2mv^2 +1/2IW^2 for rollers for chain just take 1/2mv^2
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 7 Feb 2008 20:46:38 IST
|
|
|
WRONG. Answer is 3MV^2
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 7 Feb 2008 21:44:45 IST
|
|
|
For one of the rollers:
Etotal = 1/2mv2.
Hence, KE for both the rollers = mv2
Now, considering the chain, it will move with a velocity of 2v and not v, by constraints.
Hence, we get the total KE of the system as mv2 + 1/2m(2v)2 = 3mv2
|
Will nip in at times to solve problems :)
|
this reply: 5 points
(with 1 
in 1 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 7 Feb 2008 22:01:22 IST
|
|
|
But if it moves with 2v,then wont the lower part slip?
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 7 Feb 2008 22:21:03 IST
|
|
|
No buddy. That's because the rim of the roller also moves with a speed of 2v. In case you want the derivation:
see, for the roller, w = v/r - true for all particles on the roller, as all rotate with the same angular speed, but not with the same linear velocity. Each particle has its own tangential velocity.
Now, For the particle at the topmost point, ie, at the rim, we have
v = rw or v = r x v/r = v. This is wrt the center of mass of the roller, as it is the tangential velocity. As the COM itself moves with a speed of v, the net speed = v+v = 2v. Since the rim is attached to the chain, even the chain moves with the same speed
|
Will nip in at times to solve problems :)
|
this reply: 5 points
(with 1 
in 1 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 7 Feb 2008 22:24:50 IST
|
|
|
True.But thats for the topmost point.IF u see the bottom-most point,the NET velocity of the particle is just V,but if the chain moves with 2V,relative velocity is not zero.SO slipping will occur na?
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 8 Feb 2008 00:06:11 IST
|
|
|
No dude, the speed at the bottommost point is NOT v. Just extend the same concept here.
|
Will nip in at times to solve problems :)
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 8 Feb 2008 02:48:44 IST
|
|
|
linear density of belt=p m of belt=(2l+2pier)p velocity of part DC=0 as belt is in contact with bottom ofroller which is contact with ground having v=0 for no slip KE of BC=0.5lpvsquare=k1 where v=v+rw=2v therefore k1=2lpvsquare KE of APD + BQC=2*0.5Iw square =2pieRpv square therefor total ke of belt=(2l+2pieR)pvsquare=mvsquare
now ke of rollers=2*(0.5mvsquare +0.5Iwsquare) =mvsquare+Iwsqaure taking roller as hollow cylinder ke=mvsquare +mvsquare=2mvsquare
therefore total ke=3mvsquare
|
Impossible To be Impossible is Impossible |
this reply: 5 points
(with 1 
in 1 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 8 Feb 2008 02:52:40 IST
|
|
|
here is the picture to the previous answer
|
Impossible To be Impossible is Impossible |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 8 Feb 2008 20:24:02 IST
|
|
|
Amazing,way to go man...thats the correct way to do this question. :)
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
|
|