| Author |
Message |
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 8 Jun 2008 19:17:38 IST
|
|
|
a bag of sand of mass M is suspended by a string.A bullet of mass m is fired at it with velocity v and gets embedded into it.What is the loss of kinetic energy in this process ?
|
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 8 Jun 2008 20:05:37 IST
|
|
|
this is simple .just conserve the momentum of the system and you will get the velocity of the bullet bag system .remember the velocity of the bag and the bullet are the same after collision.find the diff of the kinetic energies .
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 8 Jun 2008 22:02:59 IST
|
|
|
When we do as suggested by shashankparewar we get
loss in K.E. = 1/2 mv2 (1 - m/(m+M))
But if the bullet pierces more deeper into the sand bag will there not be any difference in loss compared to the bullet remaining on the surface ?
|
If A is a success in life, then A equals x plus y plus z. Work is x; y is play; and z is keeping your mouth shut.
[url=http://sig.graphicsfactory.com/]
          
[/url]
Glitter Graphics
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 8 Jun 2008 22:08:18 IST
|
|
|
@ little master that can be neglected there wont be much of a difference
when the bullet gets embeded it almost loses all its velocity so the velocity later can be neglected
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 9 Jun 2008 06:48:18 IST
|
|
|
mv=(M+m)V V=mv/(M+m) k.e1=1/2*m*v*v k.e2=1/2* m *mv/M+m (I HAVE TAKEN MASS AS m BCOZ WE HAV 2 FIND THE LOSS IN KINETIC ENERGY OF BULLET WHOSE MASS IS m AND AFTR STRIKING ITS VELOCITY IS mv/M+m)......
SO MY LOSS IN KINETIC ENERGY IS COMING AS mv/2(v-m/M+m)
RATE IF USEFUL ............. CORRECT IF WRONG.........
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 9 Jun 2008 10:50:29 IST
|
|
|
see as soon as the collision occurs the velocity of bag and the bullet becomes same so their relative velocity is zero how can the bullet piersce the bag.
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 9 Jun 2008 10:54:18 IST
|
|
|
we have to calculate net energy lost by the system .the velocity mv/m+M is of the bag bullet system so the kinetic energy will be that of the bag bullet system so you have to multiply the velocity of the system with M+m not as harsh.anurag has done.
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 9 Jun 2008 13:15:42 IST
|
|
|
SO MANY ANSWERS AND SO MUCH CONFUSION SEEE DUDES IT ACCORDING TO WHAT I UNDERSTAND THE QUES IS ASKING THE LOSS OF KINETIC ENERGY IN THE SYSTEM SO ASSUMING THE SAND BAG WAS INITIALL AT REST BOTH THE MASSES ARE MOVING WITH THE SAME VELO SO mV=(M+m)V2 V2=mV/(m+M) INITIAL .E. OF THE BULLET=1/2mV^2 FINAL K.E.=1/2(M+m)(mV/(m+M))^2 =1/2(mv)^2/M+m SO LOSS IN K.E. CAN BE EASILY CALCULATED PLS RATE ME IF U FIND ME USEFUL !!!!!!!!!CHEERS!!!!!!
|
From shadows a light shall spring
Renewed shall be blade that's broken
The crown less again shall be king.
MY BLOG
http://my.opera.com/vu2rje/blog/ |
this reply: 2 points
(with 0 
in 1 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 9 Jun 2008 17:11:11 IST
|
|
|
frnds answer is 1/2mv^2*M/M+m
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 9 Jun 2008 19:37:37 IST
|
|
|
dunno how??
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 10 Jun 2008 10:54:22 IST
|
|
|
varun.tinkle has done right.
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
|
|