sign up I login
 advanced
refer a friend - earn nickels!!

Ask & Discuss Questions with Community & Experts

Moderation Team
 90 chars left    advanced
Ask iit jee aieee pet cbse icse state board experts Expert Question: ONLY BRAINS AND EXPERTS
Forum Index -> Organic Chemistry like the article? email it to a friend.  
Author Message
kislay (1108)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 196  [260 rates]

kislay's Avatar

total posts: 785    
offline Offline
note: it is ncert example
which is more reactive towards sn1 reaction..

CH3CH2CH2CH2Br

or (CH3)2CHCH2Br



ans given is

(CH3)2CHCH2Br

with reasoning give  (CH3)2CH- has more +I effect than  CH3CH2CH2-

....
but

if we see the no. of H ATOMS AVAILABLE FOR HYPERCONJUGATION DURING TRTANSITION STATE
(CH3)2CHCH2Br  HAS GOT ONLY ONE........

CH3CH2CH2CH2Br HAS GOT TWO.........

AND AS WE KNOW HYPERCONJUGATION IS STRONGER THAN I EFFECT THEREFORE...............

THE ANSWERE GIVEN IS WRONG........


PLZ HHELP........



B.Tech CSE, ISMU
    
punnima (563)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 89  [148 rates]

punnima's Avatar

total posts: 438    
offline Offline
c basically the reactivity order 4 SN1 reaction is:
3o>2o>1o
 secondary haloalkanes have a tendency 2 follow either SN1 or SN2 nd this is decidedby d additional conditions specified
in this case its given one primary nd 1 secondary haloalkane
hence ther neednt b any dbt as 2 which follows SN1 reaction easily
 
 
donn complicate matters by takin hyperconjugative aspect wen u cud find out d ans easily

VARSHA KRISHNAN....
------------------------------------
IIT is always a word which rises E thru' d body. But 2 achieve it U hav 2 drain out d entire E out of the body....

 this reply: 2 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 1 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
varshavallig (798)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 136  [195 rates]

varshavallig's Avatar

total posts: 509    
offline Offline
i think the 2nd cpd will easily lead to the formation of tert. carbocation by rearrangement.so its more reactive towards SN1.
@punnima, here both are primary carbocations.plz check.
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Varsha
be cool,
tomorrow is what we make it today,
so if u can dream it , u can make it .
life is an ice cream ,eat it before it melts away!!!!!!!!!
varsha

SmileyCentral.com




 this reply: 2 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 1 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
kislay (1108)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 196  [260 rates]

kislay's Avatar

total posts: 785    
offline Offline
@varshavallig

rate of sn1 reaction deepends on the ease of formation of carbocation...........
in both cases 1 degree carbocation is formed in rate determing step.........
shift........ is secondary thing , it will determine the major product............


B.Tech CSE, ISMU
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
madhusudan.chavan (826)

Forum Expert Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 140  [203 rates]

madhusudan.chavan's Avatar

total posts: 561    
offline Offline
In both the compounds the halogen is attached to CH2 group.In first compound this CH2 is attached to another CH2 while in second it is attached to (CH3)2CH. You can compare them with n-propyl and isopropyl. The SN1 mechanism involves ionisation as the first step, then it is expected that as the electron density increases on the central carbon atom, the bonding pair in C-X becomes more and more displaced towards the atom X, and consequently ionisation of X as a negative ion will become easier. Thus in case of the second compound the two methyl groups are pumping electrons to CH while in first there is only one. Another reason is since the SN1 proceeds through the carbonium ion, the more stable this ion, the lower is the activation energy and more favoured will be this mechanism. In second compound the carbonium ion is likely to easily change to tertiary, hence this will have less activation energy.
 this reply: 5 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 1 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
kislay (1108)

Blazing goIITian

Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer. 196  [260 rates]

kislay's Avatar

total posts: 785    
offline Offline
sir ur first part seems to be correct.............
but in ur second pat
"Another reason is since the SN1 proceeds through the carbonium ion, the more stable this ion, the lower is the activation energy and more favoured will be this mechanism. In second compound the carbonium ion is likely to easily change to tertiary, hence this will have less activation energy."

activation energy is required first to convert it to 1 degree carbocatrion....the first TS
next TS(3 degree carbocation) though will have lower energy........
but activation energy will be
TS 1 - REACTANT ENERGY....................

B.Tech CSE, ISMU
 this reply: 0 points  (with Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
 
You have to be logged on to rate
  
 
Forum Index -> Organic Chemistry
Go to:   

Top Offers for goIITians
Correspondence Courses
Brilliant Tutorials
Narayana Institute
Aakash Institute
Classroom/Crash Courses
Narayana - Kota , Delhi , Others
Brilliant Tutorials - Class , Crash
Aakash Institute - Medical , Engg
Online Test Series
Brilliant Tutorials
Narayana Institute
Aakash Institute
Mahesh Tutorials
AMITY      Sri Chaitanya