| Author |
Message |
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 16 Nov 2007 10:41:48 IST
|
|
|
explain the reason of the formation of the products of the following reaction: CH 3 - CH 2 -CH(CH 3)-CH 3-O-CH2-CH3 + HI ------------->CH 3 - CH 2 -CH(CH 3)-CH 3-I + H-O-CH2-CH3 Why does CH 3 - CH 2 -CH(CH 3)-CH 3-OH + CH2-CH3 -I is not formed?
|
|
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 16 Nov 2007 11:43:06 IST
|
|
|
Because CH 3 - CH 2 -CH(CH 3)-CH 3+ seems to be a much more stable carbocation than +CH2-CH3 (which is highly unstable) to react with the nucleophile I-.This stability factor runs over the steric hindrance factor coz both carbocations are primary.
|
http://14-69-8.blogspot.com
My blog |
this reply: 2 points
(with 0 
in 1 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 16 Nov 2007 17:01:40 IST
|
|
|
@rooney
yaar if carbocation is formed then
CH3-CH2-CH(CH3)-CH2+ SHOULD REARRANGE TO FORM A SECONDARY CARBOCATION
CH3-CH2-C(CH3)+-CH3 AND THEN PRODUCT SHOULD HAVE I- ATTACHED TO SECONDARY CARBON
|
The heights which great men reached and kept, Were not attained by sudden flight, They, whilst their companions slept, Were toiling upwards in the night.... |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 16 Nov 2007 17:54:42 IST
|
|
|
Because oxygen is more electronegative and it will prefer to hold unit negative charge on it. Thus sigma bond between carbon and oxygen is broken resulting in formation of a carbocation. HI will produce H+ & I-. I- will combine with the carbocation and H+ will combine with oxygen containing group. Also charge is conserved.
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 16 Nov 2007 19:45:57 IST
|
|
|
@nishant
I know man but I couldnt find any other reason to satisfy the occurence. What I had studied was that if one of the Carbocations formed is not 3 degree and doesnt form a highly stable carbocation species, it is the smaller of the two R groups which give the Iodide.
|
http://14-69-8.blogspot.com
My blog |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 16 Nov 2007 22:14:35 IST
|
|
|
After protonation of the ether at the oxygen the I- will attack on the more postive site and in my opinion the CH 3 - CH2-CH(CH 3)-CH3-OH + CH2-CH3-I is formed
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 19 Nov 2007 12:11:23 IST
|
|
|
BCOZ IT HAS MORE +I EFFECT AND WILL PRODUCE A BETTER C+
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 19 Nov 2007 15:02:13 IST
|
|
|
See as soon as the protonation of the ether occurs a stable carbocation is formed by the release of a proton which further attacks the ether molecule to form the halide.The other part of the ether is then protonated to give alcohol.
|
I help those who help me |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 19 Nov 2007 15:21:49 IST
|
|
|
i have found the reason, OH - is better nucleophile then I - . so OH - find a more suitable alkyl group ( i.e. alkyl gp. having less size) (in this case it is CH3CH2) THIS IS THE SAME REASON WHY BELOW IS FORMED ...
|
padhna likhna chad de mitra , nakal te rakhi aas , chak chaddar te so ja bhagta , Rabb karega tennu paas.....
PLZ NEVER EVER RATE ME FOR MY ANSWERS , IF U WANT TO COMPLIMENT ME THEN JUST BEAT UR HEAD & SAY
"YEH KIS PAGAL NE MERA QN. SOLVE KER DIYA"
I AM SERIOUS!!!!
EVEN SERIOUS ^ INFINITY
PLZZZZZZ NEVER RATE ME....HOPE U WILL UNDERSTAND....
Shubham
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 19 Nov 2007 16:28:20 IST
|
|
|
@shubham
Then why is the rule that when neither of the carbocation are tertiary , smaller alkyl group forms the iodide. What you say should happen in this case as well.
Also, what do you mean by "suitable alkyl group" ? less size or more stable carbocation ?
|
http://14-69-8.blogspot.com
My blog |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
|
|