| Author |
Message |
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 26 Oct 2007 20:42:03 IST
|
|
|
If Rutherford had used a beam of electrons instead of alpha particles , which thing about electrons could hav had been discovered ???? a charge b mass c wave properties d specific charge
|
Umang |
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 26 Oct 2007 20:44:59 IST
|
|
|
specific charge is it ??????
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 26 Oct 2007 20:50:59 IST
|
|
|
Well , this is not the answer . Can u explain how u got this ???
|
Umang |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 26 Oct 2007 20:56:52 IST
|
|
|
i think it shud b mass
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 26 Oct 2007 21:01:19 IST
|
|
|
Hey ! Pls explain how u r getting these answers . Should I tell u the correct answer ?
|
Umang |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 26 Oct 2007 21:02:28 IST
|
|
|
yaa plese tell da ans
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 26 Oct 2007 21:08:10 IST
|
|
|
The correct answer is (c) Now can u explain ?
|
Umang |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 26 Oct 2007 21:12:46 IST
|
|
|
charge shall been discovered ......
plzz rate if i m right...........
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 7 Nov 2007 14:32:26 IST
|
|
|
First I think that Rutherford used Alpha particles in his gold foil experiment! Isnt it? I am not sure but what I remember is this only!
|
DO THE BEST AND HOPE FOR THE BEST!!
RESULT IS NOT IN YOUR HANDS!!!
HAVE A NICE DAY!!!
  
href="http://sig.graphicsfactory.com/" title="Glitter Graphics">Glitter Graphics</DIV></TD></TR></TABLE>
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 7 Nov 2007 18:13:38 IST
|
|
|
the answer is wave properties of the electron because this is the only characteristic of the given four options which was undiscovered at that time.morever if a beam of electrons would have been projected that will become a case of absorption spectrum which is a wave like property of electron. plzzzzz rate me i'm correct. cheers
|
there are numerous options besides I.I.T
<TABLE CELLSPACING="1" CELLPADDING="1" BORDER="0">
<TR><TD>
  
<DIV ALIGN="right">Glitter Graphics</DIV></TD></TR></TABLE>
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 8 Nov 2007 18:48:25 IST
|
|
|
c'mon yaar my answer is correct why don't you rate me
|
there are numerous options besides I.I.T
<TABLE CELLSPACING="1" CELLPADDING="1" BORDER="0">
<TR><TD>
  
<DIV ALIGN="right">Glitter Graphics</DIV></TD></TR></TABLE>
|
this reply: 7 points
(with 1 
in 2 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 9 Nov 2007 14:14:57 IST
|
|
|
look at it logically, it cant be charge or mass, since the electron mass is negligible and it wud nt show any obvious effects, now since the foil is very very thin, we can only assume that th elestrons manage to slip throught he foil, and show up on a ZnS screen on the other end, thus we assume the electron to have no mass at all. which leads us to wave properties. this was just a logical thought process. i might be very very wrong /
|
this reply: 2 points
(with 0 
in 1 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 10 Nov 2007 20:57:45 IST
|
|
|
Thank u both for ur views . Just one small doubt - when electron beam is passing near the nucleus , it will suffer attraction . Is it possible that it collides with the nucleus ???
|
Umang |
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 10 Nov 2007 21:13:13 IST
|
|
|
it will suffer attraction but at the same time it will also suffer repulsion from electrons in the atom, hence there will be no collision.
|
there are numerous options besides I.I.T
<TABLE CELLSPACING="1" CELLPADDING="1" BORDER="0">
<TR><TD>
  
<DIV ALIGN="right">Glitter Graphics</DIV></TD></TR></TABLE>
|
this reply: 0 points
(with 0 
in 0 votes ) [?]
|
|
You have to be logged on to rate
|
|
|
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 10 Nov 2007 21:17:58 IST
|
|
|