sign up I login
 advanced
refer a friend - earn nickels!!
sameerh522   sameerh522 is offline sameerh522's messages in the community
Message
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Physical Chemistry -> about phy. chem. -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
2 replies   
yes why not concepts havent changed in past2 years in chemistry
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Coaching Institutes & Course Material -> Books for BITSAT -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
1 replies   
bit sat explorer get from the site www.mtg.in if u find it useful then rate me
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Mechanics -> motion in 1 and 2 dimensions 2 plzplzplzplzplzplzplzplzplzplz reply fast -> Go to message
This Post 5 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 1 votes )   [?]
10 replies   
the position of a particle in space is described by 3 or 2 co-ordinates depending on your system with respect to the origin of the systm and IF ANY ONE ALSO OF THESE CO-ORDINATES CHANGE WITH RESPECT TO TIME THEN THEIR IS DISPLACEMENT IIIIIF ONLY ONE CO-ORDINATE CHANGES WID TIME IT IS 1D MOTION EG LINEAR IF 2 CHANGE SIMULTANEOUSLY IT I S 2D MOTION EG PROJECTILE OR CIRCULAR AND SO ON
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Integral Calculus -> tuf problem -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
2 replies   
[ ][ ]eax^3dx
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Integral Calculus -> Tuf sum -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
3 replies   
but this is what i came across in a problem in irodov i saw its solution but they have got the same function but havent shown how to integate it
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Thermal Physics -> Thermal expansion of a rod -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
5 replies   
hey u got the answer wrong try it again you are missing something crucial look back to definitions and assumptions made for the formula
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Modern Physics -> Bohr's uncertainty principle -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
6 replies   
In physics, complementarity is a basic principle of quantum theory closely identified with the Copenhagen interpretation, and refers to effects such as the wave-particle duality, in which different measurements made on a system reveal it to have either particle-like or wave-like properties. Niels Bohr is usually associated with this concept, which he developed at Copenhagen with Heisenberg, as a philosophical adjunct to the recently developed mathematics of quantum mechanics and in particular the Heisenberg uncertainty principle; in the narrow orthodox form, it is stated that a single quantum mechanical entity can either behave as a particle or as wave, but never simultaneously as both; that a stronger manifestation of the particle nature leads to a weaker manifestation of the wave nature and vice versa. In a broader, more philosophical vein Bohr stated:
There is no quantum world. There is only an abstract physical description. It is wrong to think that the task of physics is to find out how nature is. Physics concerns what we can say about nature.[1]
Complementarity or wave-particle duality is considered to be one of the distinguishing characteristics of quantum mechanics, whose theoretical and experimental development has been honoured by more than a few Nobel Prizes for Physics. It has been discussed by prominent physicists for the last 100 years, from the time of Albert Einstein, Niels Bohr and Werner Heisenberg, onwards.
The emergence of complementarity in a system occurs when one considers the circumstances under which one attempts to measure its properties; as Bohr noted, the principle of complementarity "implies the impossibility of any sharp separation between the behaviour of atomic objects and the interaction with the measuring instruments which serve to define the conditions under which the phenomena appear." It is important to distinguish, as did Bohr in his original statements, the principle of complementarity from a statement of the uncertainty principle. For a technical discussion of contemporary issues surrounding complementarity in physics, see, e.g., [2] (from which parts of this discussion were drawn.)
Various neutron interferometry experiments demonstrate the subtleness of the notions of duality and complementarity in an interesting way. By passing through the interferometer, the neutron appears to act as a wave. Yet upon passage, the neutron is subject to gravitation, which one might think only particles, and not waves, are subject to. As the neutron interferometer is rotated through Earth's gravitational field a phase change between the two arms of the interferometer can be observed, accompanied by a change in the constructive and destructive interference of the neutron waves on exit from the interferometer. Some interpretations claim that understanding the interference effect requires one to concede that a single neutron takes both paths through the interferometer at the same time; a single neutron would "be in two places at once", as it were. Since the two paths through a neutron interferometer can be as far as five to 15 cm apart, the effect is hardly microscopic. This is similar to traditional double-slit and mirror interferometer experiments where the slits (or mirrors) can be arbitrarily far apart. So, in interference and diffraction experiments, neutrons behave the same way as a photon (or an electron) of corresponding wavelength.
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Integral Calculus -> Tuf sum -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
3 replies   
[ ][ ] e-ax^3 dx
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Thermal Physics -> Thermal expansion of a rod -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
5 replies   
There is a metal rod with coefficient of thermal expansion  and length L it is heated such that it final length is 2L find the change in temperature of the rod
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Coaching Institutes & Course Material -> Books -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
3 replies   
the list of books i would suggest are
physics--- HC Verma  Resnick Halliday TMH(optional) Irodov(if u hav time)
 
Maths-----RD Sharma Aihants series TMH Educative Mathematics JEE  Dasgupta(if u have time)
 
Chemistry----Inorganic----JD LEE ,,OP Tandon,, even arihant is good
-----organic ------- SOLOMON AND FRYHLE
---Physical-------see site mtg.in  ...you can also try Essentials of Physical Chemistry.........Bahl and Bahl
But NCERT XI and XII text books area must
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> General -> Wah Taj Kyun Kahe ??? -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
11 replies   
why are you so cynical ..... jo hua woh acha hua.......atleast we  got somthing yaar
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Differential Calculus -> TUF QUESTION.................................... -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
8 replies   
[ ] infinity  exsin(d/ex)
x = 1/p
as x tends to inf p tends to 0
substitute x = 1/p
and then multiply divide by d/e1/p
the final  ansr is d
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Inorganic Chemistry -> hardest substance -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
22 replies   
man as far as my knowledge goes hardest exisisting substance on earth is carbon compounds called fullerenes they have molecular formula like C-60 , C-80 , C-120..
and yeah they are more expensive than gold cause they are no so economical to make
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Mechanics -> constraint method -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
3 replies   
i cant see the reply experts have given have they given it or not
Catalogs Discussion Forums -> Mechanics -> constraint method -> Go to message
This Post 0 points    (Olaaa!! Perrrfect answer.   in 0 votes )   [?]
3 replies   
can you  clearly explain to me with help  of few example  about constraint relationships as i get confused while applying them in complex pulley system so is there any other effective method to solve the same by avoiding constraint methods.
and please explain tome about "angle constraint"
 
 
Go to:   

 Aakash Institute IIT/ AIEEE/ Medical Crash Course
Name  
E-mail  
Phone  
Mobile  
** Hurry. Exclusive goIIT Offer. Limited Seats Only!
available in: New Delhi, Amritsar, Bhatinda, Bokaro, Chandigarj, Dehradun, Guwhati, Hyderabad, Indore, Jaipur, Kanpur, Karnal, Kolkata, Kota, Lucknow, Ludhiana, Mumbai, Noida, Patiala, Patna, Pune, Ranchi, Varanasi
Top Offers for goIITians
Correspondence Courses
Brilliant Tutorials
Narayana Institute
Aakash Institute
Classroom/Crash Courses
Aakash-IITJEE : AIEEE
Aakash-IITJEE : DCE
Aakash-IITJEE : MHTCET
Aakash Institute : AIPMT
Online Test Series
Brilliant Tutorials
Narayana Institute
Aakash Institute
Mahesh Tutorials
AMITY      Sri Chaitanya